Antibiotic Stewardship in the Management of Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcer Disease in Less Developed Countries

BackgroundDiabetic foot ulcers in developing countries often become infected. The healthcare systems are often not equipped to conduct the culture and the sensitivity tests required for prescribing a targeted antibiotic treatment for diabetic foot infection (DFI).MethodsWe evaluate antibiotic stewardship programmes for DFIs, at every level of health care, with an emphasis on resource-poor settings such as in Africa.ResultsThe management of DFI very often is adapted to the financial and practical realities of the resource-poor regions. The application of the point-of-care Gram stain of deep tissue samples is efficient, rapid, low cost and ubiquitously available. Upon the identification of the predominant pathogen in the Gram stain, a semi-quantitative preemptive antibiotic treatment can be started in accordance with the World Health Organization Aware, Watch and Restrict Essential Medicine List. This list is catered to every country and is a powerful tool. However, some basic knowledge of the local microbiological epidemiology is necessary to choose the most appropriate agent. We report our experience on using the rapidly available Gram stain for narrowing the preemptive choice of listed antibiotic agents, as an economic tool for antibiotic stewardship in DFIs.ConclusionsIn the practical and resource-saving management of DFI, the 'therapeutic' use of Gram stains is not common in resource-rich countries but should be added to the arsenal of the general efforts for antibiotic stewardship. Diabetic foot infections (DFIs) in developing countries often are difficult to manage. The healthcare systems are often not equipped to conduct the culture and the sensitivity tests required for prescribing a targeted antibiotic treatment. We evaluate antibiotic stewardship programmes for DFIs, at every level of health care, with an emphasis on resource-poor settings such as in Africa.image