Can Artificial Intelligence Accurately Detect Urinary Stones? A Systematic Review

被引:0
|
作者
Panthier, Frederic [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Melchionna, Alberto [1 ]
Crawford-Smith, Hugh [1 ]
Phillipou, Yiannis [1 ]
Choong, Simon [1 ]
Arumuham, Vimoshan [1 ]
Allen, Sian [1 ]
Allen, Clare [5 ]
Smith, Daron [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] UCLH NHS Fdn Trust, Westmoreland St Hosp, Dept Urol, London W1G 8PH, England
[2] Sorbonne Univ, GRC Urolithiasis Tenon Hosp 20, Paris, France
[3] Progress Endourol Assoc Res & Leading Solut PEARLS, Paris, France
[4] CNRS, UMR 8006, PIMM, Arts & Metiers ParisTech, Paris, France
[5] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Radiol, London, England
[6] Endourol Acad, Arnhem, Netherlands
[7] Social Media Comm, Endourol Soc, New York, NY USA
关键词
artificial intelligence; machine learning; convolutional neural network; urinary stones; volume; detection; LOW-DOSE CT; LEARNING SEGMENTATION; KIDNEY-STONES; UROLITHIASIS;
D O I
10.1089/end.2023.0717
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To perform a systematic review on artificial intelligence (AI) performances to detect urinary stones.Methods: A PROSPERO-registered (CRD473152) systematic search of Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed databases was performed to identify original research articles pertaining to AI stone detection or measurement, using search terms ("automatic" OR "machine learning" OR "convolutional neural network" OR "artificial intelligence" OR "detection" AND "stone volume"). Risk-of-bias (RoB) assessment was performed according to the Cochrane RoB tool, the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for nonrandomized studies, and the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM).Results: Twelve studies were selected for the final review, including three multicenter and nine single-center retrospective studies. Eleven studies completed at least 50% of the CLAIM checkpoints and only one presented a high RoB. All included studies aimed to detect kidney (5/12, 42%), ureter (2/12, 16%), or urinary (5/12, 42%) stones on noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT), but 42% intended to automate measurement. Stone distinction from vascular calcification interested two studies. All studies used AI machine learning network training and internal validation, but a single one provided an external validation. Trained networks achieved stone detection, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates ranging from 58.7% to 100%, 68.5% to 100%, and 63% to 99.95%, respectively. Detection Dice score ranged from 83% to 97%. A high correlation between manual and automated stone volume (r = 0.95) was noted. Differentiate distal ureteral stones and phleboliths seemed feasible.Conclusions: AI processes can achieve automated urinary stone detection from NCCT. Further studies should provide urinary stone detection coupled with phlebolith distinction and an external validation, and include anatomical abnormalities and urologic foreign bodies (ureteral stent and nephrostomy tubes) cases.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Artificial intelligence for brain diseases: A systematic review
    Segato, Alice
    Marzullo, Aldo
    Calimeri, Francesco
    De Momi, Elena
    APL BIOENGINEERING, 2020, 4 (04):
  • [32] The application of artificial intelligence in hepatology: A systematic review
    Balsano, Clara
    Alisi, Anna
    Brunetto, Maurizia R.
    Invernizzi, Pietro
    Burra, Patrizia
    Piscaglia, Fabio
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2022, 54 (03) : 299 - 308
  • [33] Artificial Intelligence in Malnutrition: A Systematic Literature Review
    Janssen, Sander M. W.
    Bouzembrak, Yamine
    Tekinerdogan, Bedir
    ADVANCES IN NUTRITION, 2024, 15 (09)
  • [34] A Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence in Prostate Cancer
    Van Booven, Derek J.
    Kuchakulla, Manish
    Pai, Raghav
    Frech, Fabio S.
    Ramasahayam, Reshna
    Reddy, Pritika
    Parmar, Madhumita
    Ramasamy, Ranjith
    Arora, Himanshu
    RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2021, 13 : 31 - 39
  • [35] A systematic review of artificial intelligence impact assessments
    Stahl, Bernd Carsten
    Antoniou, Josephina
    Bhalla, Nitika
    Brooks, Laurence
    Jansen, Philip
    Lindqvist, Blerta
    Kirichenko, Alexey
    Marchal, Samuel
    Rodrigues, Rowena
    Santiago, Nicole
    Warso, Zuzanna
    Wright, David
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2023, 56 (11) : 12799 - 12831
  • [36] Applications of artificial intelligence in anesthesia: A systematic review
    Kambale, Monika
    Jadhav, Sammita
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2024, 18 (02) : 249 - 256
  • [37] Use of Artificial Intelligence for Training: A Systematic Review
    Jiang, Nina
    Duffy, Vincent G.
    DIGITAL HUMAN MODELING AND APPLICATIONS IN HEALTH, SAFETY, ERGONOMICS AND RISK MANAGEMENT, DHM 2024, PT III, 2024, 14711 : 346 - 363
  • [38] Artificial intelligence in marketing: A systematic literature review
    Chintalapati, Srikrishna
    Pandey, Shivendra Kumar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2022, 64 (01) : 38 - 68
  • [39] Artificial Intelligence for Student Assessment: A Systematic Review
    Gonzalez-Calatayud, Victor
    Prendes-Espinosa, Paz
    Roig-Vila, Rosabel
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [40] Systematic Review on Safety of Artificial Intelligence and Transportation
    Biddala, Sai Chandrahas Reddy
    Ibikunle, Omolara
    Duffy, Vincent G.
    HCI INTERNATIONAL 2023 LATE BREAKING PAPERS, HCII 2023,PT IV, 2023, 14057 : 248 - 263