Can Artificial Intelligence Accurately Detect Urinary Stones? A Systematic Review

被引:0
|
作者
Panthier, Frederic [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Melchionna, Alberto [1 ]
Crawford-Smith, Hugh [1 ]
Phillipou, Yiannis [1 ]
Choong, Simon [1 ]
Arumuham, Vimoshan [1 ]
Allen, Sian [1 ]
Allen, Clare [5 ]
Smith, Daron [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] UCLH NHS Fdn Trust, Westmoreland St Hosp, Dept Urol, London W1G 8PH, England
[2] Sorbonne Univ, GRC Urolithiasis Tenon Hosp 20, Paris, France
[3] Progress Endourol Assoc Res & Leading Solut PEARLS, Paris, France
[4] CNRS, UMR 8006, PIMM, Arts & Metiers ParisTech, Paris, France
[5] Univ Coll London Hosp, Dept Radiol, London, England
[6] Endourol Acad, Arnhem, Netherlands
[7] Social Media Comm, Endourol Soc, New York, NY USA
关键词
artificial intelligence; machine learning; convolutional neural network; urinary stones; volume; detection; LOW-DOSE CT; LEARNING SEGMENTATION; KIDNEY-STONES; UROLITHIASIS;
D O I
10.1089/end.2023.0717
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To perform a systematic review on artificial intelligence (AI) performances to detect urinary stones.Methods: A PROSPERO-registered (CRD473152) systematic search of Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and PubMed databases was performed to identify original research articles pertaining to AI stone detection or measurement, using search terms ("automatic" OR "machine learning" OR "convolutional neural network" OR "artificial intelligence" OR "detection" AND "stone volume"). Risk-of-bias (RoB) assessment was performed according to the Cochrane RoB tool, the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for nonrandomized studies, and the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM).Results: Twelve studies were selected for the final review, including three multicenter and nine single-center retrospective studies. Eleven studies completed at least 50% of the CLAIM checkpoints and only one presented a high RoB. All included studies aimed to detect kidney (5/12, 42%), ureter (2/12, 16%), or urinary (5/12, 42%) stones on noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT), but 42% intended to automate measurement. Stone distinction from vascular calcification interested two studies. All studies used AI machine learning network training and internal validation, but a single one provided an external validation. Trained networks achieved stone detection, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates ranging from 58.7% to 100%, 68.5% to 100%, and 63% to 99.95%, respectively. Detection Dice score ranged from 83% to 97%. A high correlation between manual and automated stone volume (r = 0.95) was noted. Differentiate distal ureteral stones and phleboliths seemed feasible.Conclusions: AI processes can achieve automated urinary stone detection from NCCT. Further studies should provide urinary stone detection coupled with phlebolith distinction and an external validation, and include anatomical abnormalities and urologic foreign bodies (ureteral stent and nephrostomy tubes) cases.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Can artificial intelligence detect papilloedema?
    Skodvin, Torbjorn Oygard
    [J]. TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2020, 140 (11) : 1115 - 1116
  • [2] Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of urinary stones
    Yang, Bob
    Veneziano, Domenico
    Somani, Bhaskar K.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2020, 30 (06) : 782 - 787
  • [3] Can Artificial Intelligence Generate a Superior Introduction to a Systematic Review?
    Hellstrom, W.
    Singh, D.
    Brinkley, G.
    Trost, L.
    Ziegelmann, M.
    Brock, G.
    Khera, M.
    Mulhall, J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2024, 21
  • [4] Systematic review: Can non-mydriatic cameras accurately detect diabetic retinopathy?
    Bedard, Chloe
    Liu, Siying
    Patterson, Christopher
    Gerstein, Hertzel
    Griffith, Lauren
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2017, 129 : 154 - 159
  • [5] Artificial Intelligence Techniques to Detect and Prevent Corruption in Procurement: A Systematic Literature Review
    Torres Berru, Yeferson
    Lopez Batista, Vivian Felix
    Torres-Carrion, Pablo
    Gabriela Jimenez, Maria
    [J]. APPLIED TECHNOLOGIES (ICAT 2019), PT II, 2020, 1194 : 254 - 268
  • [6] CAN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE HELP TO PREDICT VENTILATION DAYS? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Spiegel, Rainer
    Stocker, Silvie
    Opic, Petra
    Semmlack, Saskia
    Tisljar, Kai
    Sutter, Raoul
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 47
  • [7] Can we use artificial intelligence for systematic literature review in rheumatology?
    Foulquier, Nathan
    Rouviere, Benedicte
    Saraux, Alain
    [J]. JOINT BONE SPINE, 2021, 88 (03)
  • [8] How can artificial intelligence impact sustainability: A systematic literature review
    Kar, Arpan Kumar
    Choudhary, Shweta Kumari
    Singh, Vinay Kumar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 376
  • [9] How artificial Intelligence can detect rare Diseases
    不详
    [J]. SCHMERZ, 2019, 33 (05): : 383 - 383
  • [10] How Artificial Intelligence can detect Rare Diseases
    不详
    [J]. GYNAKOLOGE, 2019, 52 (10): : 743 - 743