A Comparative Study of Dynamic Hip Screws and Proximal Femoral Nails in Intertrochanteric Fractures

被引:0
|
作者
Thusoo, Varun [1 ]
Nehru, Ashish [2 ]
Kudyar, Sachin [3 ]
Chakrapani, Arjun S. [4 ]
Saini, Eshaan Singh [5 ]
Alok, K., V [6 ]
Narender, D. [7 ]
Philip, Suraj [8 ]
机构
[1] Adesh Med Coll & Hosp, Orthopaed Surg, Ambala, India
[2] Govt Med Coll & Rajindra Hosp, Orthopaed & Trauma, Patiala, India
[3] Govt Med Hosp, Orthopaed, Jammu, India
[4] Apollo Special Hosp, Orthopaed, Chennai, India
[5] Adesh Med Coll & Hosp, Orthopaed, Ambala, India
[6] Osmania Med Coll & Hosp, Orthopaed & Trauma, Hyderabad, India
[7] Govt Med Coll, Orthopaed & Trauma, Kothagudem, India
[8] Pushpagiri Inst Med Sci, Orthopaed, Hyderabad, India
关键词
weight bearing; intertrochanteric hip fractures; hip fracture; dynamic hip screws; proximal femoral nails; PERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; INTRAMEDULLARY; FIXATION; PLATE;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.59063
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Intertrochanteric fractures, which occur in the hip of older individuals due to the weak and brittle structure of the bone caused by osteoporosis, make up over 50% of all hip fractures. There are several treatment options available for these fractures. The major objective of this study was to carry out a comparative analysis to evaluate the efficacy of dynamic hip screws (DHS) and proximal femoral nails (PFN) in treating intertrochanteric fractures. Methodology Two hundred instances of intertrochanteric hip fractures were surgically treated between July 2022 and January 2024 at a tertiary care facility. The evaluation of fractures was conducted in two groups, namely, group 1, which consisted of 140 patients, each having a fracture in one hip, treated using the DHS method. Group 2 consisted of 60 patients, each having a fracture in one hip, treated using the PFN technique. The evaluation of functional results was performed with the Harris hip score. Results In the investigation within these groups, group 1 produced excellent outcomes in 53 patients, which accounts for 37.86% of the total. In group 2, the expected results were achieved in 34 patients (56.67%). Achieved outcomes were favorable in 75 (53.57%) individuals in group 1 and 21 (35%) in group 2. Out of the individuals in group 1, eight (5.71%) saw benefits, whereas four (1.6%) did not gain significantly. In group 2, five (8.33%) individuals benefitted. None of the patients in group 2 had unfavorable outcomes. Conclusion While both PFN and DHS provide comparable outcomes in stable bone, PFN demonstrated superior results in cases of unstable bone. The use of PFN results in reduced surgical duration and a smaller surgical opening. Additionally, PFN exhibited superior specificity compared to DHS, especially in cases with stable intertrochanteric bone.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Proximal femoral nails anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screws for treatment of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: an outcome analyses with a minimum 4 years of follow-up
    Weiguang Yu
    Xinchao Zhang
    Xingfei Zhu
    Zuochong Yu
    Yinfeng Xu
    Guoqing Zha
    Jun Hu
    Jianhua Yi
    Yunjiang Liu
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 17
  • [22] A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures
    Yanfeng Huang
    Chunlin Zhang
    Yi Luo
    International Orthopaedics, 2013, 37 : 2465 - 2473
  • [23] Proximal femoral nails anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screws for treatment of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: an outcome analyses with a minimum 4 years of follow-up
    Yu, Weiguang
    Zhang, Xinchao
    Zhu, Xingfei
    Yu, Zuochong
    Xu, Yinfeng
    Zha, Guoqing
    Hu, Jun
    Yi, Jianhua
    Liu, Yunjiang
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2016, 17
  • [24] A comparative biomechanical study of proximal femoral nail (InterTAN) and proximal femoral nail antirotation for intertrochanteric fractures
    Huang, Yanfeng
    Zhang, Chunlin
    Luo, Yi
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2013, 37 (12) : 2465 - 2473
  • [25] 386 Proximal Femoral Nail (PFN) Versus Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) In Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of Femur -A Comparative Clinical Study
    Dubey, V
    Spiegelberg, B.
    Shahane, S.
    Samant, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (SUPPL 2)
  • [26] Surgical Treatment of Basicervical Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Proximal Femur with Cephalomeduallary Hip Nails
    Hu, Sun-jun
    Yu, Guang-rong
    Zhang, Shi-min
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2013, 5 (02) : 124 - 129
  • [27] Gamma Nails Revisited: Gamma Nails Versus Compression Hip Screws in the Management of Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Hip: A Meta-Analysis
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Schemitsch, Emil
    Joensson, Anders
    Zlowodzki, Michael
    Haidukewych, George J.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2009, 23 (06) : 460 - 464
  • [28] Proximal Femoral Nail in Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures
    Mehboob, I
    JOURNAL OF NEPAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 48 (04) : 273 - 275
  • [29] Comparison of Third Generation Proximal Femoral Nails in Treatment of Reverse Oblique Intertrochanteric Fractures
    Ulku, Tekin Kerem
    Tok, Okan
    Seyhan, Mustafa
    Gereli, Arel
    Kaya, Alper
    BEZMIALEM SCIENCE, 2019, 7 (04): : 271 - 275
  • [30] Functional results of intertrochanteric femur fractures after successful osteosynthesis with proximal femoral nails
    Eren, Ilker
    Koyuncu, Daghan
    Gonen, Emel
    CUKUROVA MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 44 (04): : 1323 - 1328