Pharmacological validation of an attention bias test for conventional broiler chickens

被引:1
|
作者
da Silva, Marconi Italo Lourenco [1 ]
Ulans, Alexandra [2 ]
Jacobs, Leonie [2 ]
机构
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ, Sch Vet Med & Anim Sci, Dept Anim Prod & Prevent Vet Med, Botucatu, SP, Brazil
[2] Virginia Tech, Sch Anim Sci, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 04期
关键词
BETA-CARBOLINE; FG; 7142; TONIC IMMOBILITY; INVERSE AGONIST; COGNITIVE BIAS; FEATHER DAMAGE; GALLUS-GALLUS; LEG WEAKNESS; LAYING HENS; LAYER-TYPE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0297715
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Fear and anxiety are considered concerns for animal welfare as they are associated with negative affective states. This study aimed to pharmacologically validate an attention bias test (ABT) for broiler chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus) as a cognitive bias test to determine anxiety. Two-hundred-and-four male Ross 708 broiler chickens were arbitrarily allocated to either the anxiogenic or control treatment at 25 days of age (n = 102/treatment). Birds from the anxiogenic group were administered with 2.5 mg of beta-CCM (beta-carboline-3-carboxylic acid-N-methylamide [FG 7142]) per kg of body weight through an intraperitoneal injection (0.1 ml/100 g of body weight). Birds from the control group were administered with 9 mg of a saline solution per kg of body weight. During ABT, birds were tested in groups of three (n = 34 groups of three birds/treatment) with commercial feed and mealworms as positive stimuli and a conspecific alarm call as a negative stimulus. Control birds were 45 s faster to begin feeding than anxiogenic birds. Birds from the control group vocalized 40 s later and stepped 57 s later than birds from the anxiogenic group. The occurrence of vigilance behaviors did not differ between treatments. This study was successful in pharmacologically validating an attention bias test for fast-growing broiler chickens, testing three birds simultaneously. Our findings showed that latencies to begin feeding, first vocalization, and first step were valid measures to quantify anxiety.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy of Savory Essential Oil Utilization in Conventional and Encapsulated Forms on Performance of Broiler Chickens
    Mousapour, A.
    Salarmoini, M.
    Afsharmanesh, M.
    Ebrahimnejad, H.
    Meimandipour, A.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF POULTRY SCIENCE, 2020, 22 (04) : 1 - 12
  • [22] EFFECT OF KOSHER VS CONVENTIONAL PROCESSING ON YIELD QUALITY, AND ACCEPTABILITY OF BROILER-CHICKENS
    MAST, MG
    MACNEIL, JH
    JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE, 1983, 48 (04) : 1013 - &
  • [23] Gut microflora of organically grown broiler chickens differs significantly from that of conventional birds
    Kettunen, A.
    Buresh, R.
    Pierson, E.
    Apajalahti, J.
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2005, 84 : 109 - 109
  • [24] Attention Bias Test Differentiates Anxiety and Depression in Sheep
    Monk, Jessica E.
    Belson, Sue
    Colditz, Ian G.
    Lee, Caroline
    FRONTIERS IN BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 12
  • [25] A test of enzymic preparation in relation to performance and commercial utilization of feeds in broiler chickens
    Angelovicova, M
    Michalik, I
    ZIVOCISNA VYROBA, 1997, 42 (04): : 175 - 180
  • [26] In pursuit of a better broiler: tibial morphology, breaking strength, and ash content in conventional and slower-growing strains of broiler chickens
    Santos, Midian N.
    Widowski, Tina M.
    Kiarie, Elijah G.
    Guerin, Michele T.
    Edwards, A. Michelle
    Torrey, Stephanie
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2022, 101 (04)
  • [27] Prophybiotics for in-ovo stimulation; validation of effects on gut health and production of broiler chickens
    Wishna-Kadawarage, Ramesha N.
    Poltowicz, Katarzyna
    Dankowiakowska, Agata
    Hickey, Rita M.
    Siwek, Maria
    POULTRY SCIENCE, 2024, 103 (04)
  • [28] Validation of histological and visual scoring systems for foot-pad dermatitis in broiler chickens
    Piller, A.
    Bergmann, S.
    Schwarzer, A.
    Erhard, M.
    Stracke, J.
    Spindler, B.
    Kemper, N.
    Schmidt, P.
    Bachmeier, J.
    Schade, B.
    Boehm, B.
    Kappe, E.
    Louton, H.
    ANIMAL WELFARE, 2020, 29 (02) : 185 - 196
  • [29] A comparison survey of organic and conventional broiler chickens for infectious agents affecting health and food safety
    Van Overbeke, I.
    Duchateau, L.
    De Zutter, L.
    Albers, G.
    Ducatelle, R.
    AVIAN DISEASES, 2006, 50 (02) : 196 - 200
  • [30] A conventional hatchery vs "on-farm" hatching of broiler chickens in terms of microbiological and microclimatic conditions
    Trela, M.
    Hejdysz, M.
    Kaczmarek, S.
    Wesierska, E.
    Babuszkiewicz, M.
    Lis, M. W.
    ANIMAL, 2024, 18 (08)