Differences in Electroencephalography Power Levels between Poor and Good Performance in Attentional Tasks

被引:0
|
作者
Matsuo, Moemi [1 ]
Higuchi, Takashi [2 ]
Ichibakase, Taiyo [1 ]
Suyama, Hikaru [1 ]
Takahara, Runa [1 ]
Nakamura, Masatoshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Nishikyushu Univ, Fac Rehabil Sci, Kanzaki, Saga 8428585, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ Human Sci, Dept Phys Therapy, Settsu, Osaka 5668501, Japan
关键词
attentional function; electroencephalography; brain function; neuroimaging; neuroscience; brain injury; EEG;
D O I
10.3390/brainsci14060527
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Decreased attentional function causes problems in daily life. However, a quick and easy evaluation method of attentional function has not yet been developed. Therefore, we are searching for a method to evaluate attentional function easily and quickly. This study aimed to collect basic data on the features of electroencephalography (EEG) during attention tasks to develop a new method for evaluating attentional function using EEG. Twenty healthy young adults participated; we examined cerebral activity during a Clinical Assessment for Attention using portable EEG devices. The Mann-Whitney U test was performed to assess differences in power levels of EEG during tasks between the low- and high-attention groups. The findings revealed that the high-attention group showed significantly higher EEG power levels in the delta wave of L-temporal and bilateral parietal lobes, as well as in the beta and gamma waves of the R-occipital lobe, than did the low-attention group during digit-forward, whereas the high-attention group showed significantly higher EEG power levels in the theta wave of R-frontal and the alpha wave of bilateral frontal lobes during digit-backward. Notably, lower theta, alpha, and beta bands of the right hemisphere found in the low-attention group may be key elements to detect attentional deficit.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Poor relationship between strength and power qualities and agility performance
    Markovic, G.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE AND PHYSICAL FITNESS, 2007, 47 (03): : 276 - 283
  • [42] DO GOOD OR POOR PERFORMERS LEAVE - A METAANALYSIS OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PERFORMANCE AND TURNOVER
    MCEVOY, GM
    CASCIO, WF
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1987, 30 (04): : 744 - 762
  • [43] Onsets and rimes in a phonologically transparent orthography: Differences between good and poor beginning readers of Dutch
    Geudens, A
    Sandra, D
    BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 1999, 68 (1-2) : 284 - 290
  • [44] Force- and Velocity-Profile Differences Between Good and Poor Countermovement Vertical Jumpers
    Harry, John R.
    Barker, Leland A.
    Dufek, Janet S.
    James, C. Roger
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2018, 50 (05): : 686 - 686
  • [45] Differences between good and poor heartbeat perceivers are reflected in emotion-related brain activity
    Pollatos, O
    Schandry, R
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 16 (04) : 246 - 246
  • [46] PERFORMANCE OF GOOD AND POOR READERS AT 2 GRADE LEVELS ON AN AUDITORY COGNITIVE-STYLE TASK
    SNYDER, FR
    BUTTER, EJ
    CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 10 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [47] Nonverbal pre-performance expressions of professional darts players distinguish between good and poor performance
    Philip Furley
    Florian Klingner
    Daniel Memmert
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [48] Nonverbal pre-performance expressions of professional darts players distinguish between good and poor performance
    Furley, Philip
    Klingner, Florian
    Memmert, Daniel
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [49] Differences in Early Maladaptive Schemas between Young Adults Displaying Poor Versus Good Sleep Quality
    Rodrigues, Patricia Monteiro
    Marques, Daniel Ruivo
    Gomes, Ana Allen
    PSYCHIATRIC QUARTERLY, 2019, 90 (04) : 733 - 746
  • [50] Testicular cytology indicates differences in Sertoli cell counts between "good freezer" and "poor freezer" bulls
    Rajak, Shailendra Kumar
    Thippeswamy, Vijetha Bajjalli
    Kumaresan, Arumugam
    Layek, Siddhartha Shankar
    Mohanty, Tushar Kumar
    Gaurav, Mukesh Kumar
    Chakravarty, Atish Kumar
    Datta, Tirtha Kumar
    Manimaran, Ayyasamy
    Prasad, Shiv
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2016, 54 (01) : 17 - 25