Straw management adopted by large farms sustains grain yield but mitigates greenhouse gas emissions

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Zhenzhen [1 ]
Lin, Yong [2 ]
Kan, Zheng-Rong [1 ]
Rehman, Sana ur [3 ]
Din, Atta Mohi Ud [3 ]
Li, Feng-Min [1 ]
Zhang, Shixiang [4 ]
Wu, Ping [2 ]
Ding, Yingfu [2 ]
Xu, Chensheng [2 ]
Rao, Congying [2 ]
Dai, Huaxin [4 ,5 ]
Yang, Haishui [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Agr Univ, Coll Agr, Nanjing 210095, Peoples R China
[2] Fujian Tobacco Co, Nanping Branch, Nanping 353000, Peoples R China
[3] Islamia Univ Bahawalpur, Natl Res Ctr Intercropping, Bahawalpur, Pakistan
[4] China Natl Tobacco Corp, Zhengzhou Tobacco Res Inst, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
[5] China Natl Tobacco Corp CNTC, Zhengzhou Tobacco Res Inst, Zhengzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
Farm size; Rice-wheat rotation; Straw incorporation; Greenhouse gas; Yield; NITROUS-OXIDE; METHANE EMISSIONS; N2O EMISSION; RICE; SYSTEMS; SOIL; TILLAGE; FIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109409
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Context: Straw incorporation is a globally recommended strategy for enhancing soil fertility. The methods for straw incorporation adopted by large farms usually differ from those used by small households, primarily because of variations in cost affordability. However, the effects of straw management on rice yields and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions have not been well explored at different farming scales. Objectives: This study aims to compare the grain yield and greenhouse gas emissions under different straw management adopted by large farms than small households. Methods: A three-year field experiment using split-plot design, with straw management as the main plot and preceding tillage as the sub-plot, was conducted in a wheat-rice rotation system. Four treatments were given as rotary tillage with straw removal (RT-S), rotary tillage with straw incorporation (RT+S; small households), ploughing tillage with straw removal (PT-S), and ploughing tillage with straw incorporation (PT+S, large farms) in the preceding wheat season. Soil tillage in the rice season was the same, which was rotary tillage after irrigation. Results: Straw incorporation significantly increased methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions, and 60%62% of CH4 was emitted during the transplanting to jointing stages while 45-73% of N2O was emitted during the jointing to the booting stage. The stimulation of CH4 and N2O emissions by straw incorporation was closely correlated to enhanced soil organic carbon (SOC) and denitrification enzyme activity, respectively. In the last year, PT+S significantly reduced the global warming potential (GWP) compared to RT+S in the whole rice season, which can be attributed to the dramatically decline of CH4 emission, even though N2O emission was increased. Additionally, the decreased CH4 emission was mainly due to lower methanogenic activity, and the increased N2O emission was mainly resulted from lower nosZ abundance under PT+S compared to RT+S. Straw incorporation increased rice yield by 15.73% on average in the last two years, and rice yield of PT+S in the last year was significantly enhanced by 27.50%, resulting in a lower greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) by 25.54% compared to RT+S. Conclusion: Straw management practices adopted by large farms (PT+S) have the potential to synchronize high rice yields with lower GHG emissions compared to small households (RT+S). Implications: Our findings provide some evidence that large-scale agricultural organization may be helpful for sustainable rice production in China.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Manure management: Implications for greenhouse gas emissions
    Chadwick, Dave
    Sommer, Sven Gjedde
    Thorman, Rachel
    Fangueiro, David
    Cardenas, Laura
    Amon, Barbara
    Misselbrook, Tom
    ANIMAL FEED SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 166-67 : 514 - 531
  • [32] Comparison of greenhouse gas emissions from Mexican intensive dairy farms
    Rendon-Huerta, J. A.
    Pinos-Rodriguez, J. M.
    Kebreab, E.
    Garcia-Lopez, J. C.
    Vicente, J. G.
    SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2018, 48 (01) : 48 - 55
  • [33] Modelling greenhouse gas emissions from organic and conventional dairy farms
    Frank, Helmut
    Schmid, Harald
    Huelsbergen, Kurt-Juergen
    LANDBAUFORSCHUNG-JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AND ORGANIC AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 69 (01): : 37 - 46
  • [34] Can management practices provide greenhouse gas abatement in grain farms in New South Wales, Australia?
    Palmer, Jeda
    Thorburn, Peter J.
    Meier, Elizabeth A.
    Biggs, Jody S.
    Whelan, Brett
    Singh, Kanika
    Eyre, David N.
    CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE, 2017, 68 (04): : 390 - 400
  • [35] Greenhouse gas emissions from electricity generated by offshore wind farms
    Reimers, Britta
    Oezdirik, Burcu
    Kaltschmitt, Martin
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2014, 72 : 428 - 438
  • [36] The cost of mitigating greenhouse gas emissions in farms in Central Andes of Ecuador
    Cayambe, Jhenny
    Iglesias, Ana
    SPANISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, 2020, 18 (01)
  • [37] Effects of biodegradable microplastics and straw addition on soil greenhouse gas emissions
    Yan, Ziwei
    Lin, Shan
    Hu, Ronggui
    Cheng, Hongguang
    Xiang, Rongbiao
    Xu, Han
    Zhao, Jinsong
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2024, 356
  • [38] Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Tourism-Based Leisure Farms in Taiwan
    Huang, Kuo-Tsang
    Wang, Jen Chun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2015, 7 (08): : 11032 - 11049
  • [39] Greenhouse gas abatement costs are heterogeneous between Australian grain farms
    Nikki P. Dumbrell
    Marit E. Kragt
    Elizabeth A. Meier
    Jody S. Biggs
    Peter J. Thorburn
    Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2017, 37
  • [40] Greenhouse gas abatement costs are heterogeneous between Australian grain farms
    Dumbrell, Nikki P.
    Kragt, Marit E.
    Meier, Elizabeth A.
    Biggs, Jody S.
    Thorburn, Peter J.
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 37 (04)