US County-Level Variation in Availability and Prevalence of Black Physicians in 1906

被引:1
|
作者
Chrisinger, Benjamin W. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Dept Community Hlth, 574 Boston Ave,Ste 208, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Social Policy & Intervent, Oxford, England
关键词
GENERALIZED ADDITIVE-MODELS; AFRICAN-AMERICAN PHYSICIANS; ORGANIZED MEDICINE; UNITED-STATES;
D O I
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.10242
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Black physicians are substantially underrepresented in the US health care workforce, with detrimental effects on the health and health care experiences of Black individuals. These contemporary gaps can be traced to the early days of the medical profession using the first edition of the American Medical Directory (AMD). OBJECTIVE To identify state- and county-level patterns related to the training and availability of Black physicians relative to their White counterparts in the 1906 AMD. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS For this cross-sectional study, data for 41 828 physician entries in 18 US states in or adjacent to the South as well as the District of Columbia were extracted from the 1906 AMD and aggregated to 1570 counties. Data analysis was performed between September 2023 and January 2024. EXPOSURES County-level exposure variables included population density, racial composition, and illiteracy rate among US-born White residents as well as an index of terrain ruggedness and the number of lynchings in the previous decade. Median values of physicians' distance from place of practice to place of medical training (by race of physician) were also used as an exposure variable. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES There were 4 county-level outcomes: (1) presence of any Black physician, (2) proportion of Black physicians per Black population, (3) proportion of White physicians per White population, and (4) community representativeness (reported as the community representativeness ratio). The cross-sectional analysis used generalized additive mixed models with state-level random effects. RESULTS Across 1570 counties, Black physicians comprised 746 (1.8%) of the 41 828 physicians in the dataset. Black physicians tended to train further from their place of practice than their White counterparts. The proportion of Black physicians per 1000 Black residents was 0.08 compared with 1.62 for White physicians; these proportions varied substantially by state. At the county level, the presence of any Black physician was associated with percentage Black population (odds ratio [OR], 28.94 [95% CI, 9.77 to 85.76]; P <= .001), population density (OR, 2.63 [95% CI, 2.03 to 3.40]; P <= .001), and distance to the nearest Black medical school (OR, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.42 to 0.92]; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE A variety of structural disadvantages are illustrated in this cross-sectional study of county-level sociodemographic and geographic characteristics associated with the prevalence of Black physicians in the earliest days of the profession. To demonstrate its broader utility for health disparities research, the dataset has been made publicly available with a visualization platform.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Factors Associated with County-Level Variation in the Prescription of Statins
    Karpinski, Steph A.
    Look, Kevin A.
    Vanness, David J.
    JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE & SPECIALTY PHARMACY, 2019, 25 (12): : 1358 - 1365
  • [32] US county-level prevalence and spatial distribution of optimal birth outcomes 2018-2019
    Dyer, Lauren
    Bell, Caryn
    Perez, Susan
    Crear-Perry, Joia
    Theall, Katherine
    Wallace, Maeve
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [33] Association of County-Level Prescriptions for Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin With County-Level Political Voting Patterns in the 2020 US Presidential Election
    Barnett, Michael L.
    Gaye, Marema
    Jena, Anupam B.
    Mehrotra, Ateev
    JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2022, 182 (04) : 452 - 454
  • [34] County-level air quality and the prevalence of diagnosed chronic kidney disease in the US Medicare population
    Bragg-Gresham, Jennifer
    Morgenstern, Hal
    McClellan, William
    Saydah, Sharon
    Pavkov, Meda
    Williams, Desmond
    Powe, Neil
    Tuot, Delphine
    Hsu, Raymond
    Saran, Rajiv
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (07):
  • [35] Connecting Race and Place: A County-Level Analysis of White, Black, and Hispanic HIV Prevalence, Poverty, and Level of Urbanization
    Vaughan, Adam S.
    Rosenberg, Eli
    Shouse, R. Luke
    Sullivan, Patrick S.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2014, 104 (07) : E77 - E84
  • [36] HIV Infection Prevalence Significantly Intersects With COVID-19 Infection At the Area Level: A US County-Level Analysis
    Luan, Hui
    Song, Insang
    Fiellin, David A.
    Ransome, Yusuf
    JAIDS-JOURNAL OF ACQUIRED IMMUNE DEFICIENCY SYNDROMES, 2021, 88 (02) : 125 - 131
  • [37] Statewide county-level autism spectrum disorder prevalence estimates-seven US states, 2018
    Shaw, Kelly A.
    Williams, Susan
    Hughes, Michelle M.
    Warren, Zachary
    Bakian, Amanda, V
    Durkin, Maureen S.
    Esler, Amy
    Hall-Lande, Jennifer
    Salinas, Angelica
    Vehorn, Alison
    Andrews, Jennifer G.
    Baroud, Thaer
    Bilder, Deborah A.
    Dimian, Adele
    Galindo, Maureen
    Hudson, Allison
    Hallas, Libby
    Lopez, Maya
    Pokoski, Olivia
    Pettygrove, Sydney
    Rossow, Katelyn
    Shenouda, Josephine
    Schwenk, Yvette D.
    Zahorodny, Walter
    Washington, Anita
    Maenner, Matthew J.
    ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 79 : 39 - 43
  • [38] Occupational association with melanoma: a US ecological county-level analysis
    Thomas, Kaden M.
    Cullison, Christopher R.
    Herrera, Henry O.
    Bordeaux, Jeremy S.
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 316 (05)
  • [39] Interest group pressures and US county-level toxic emissions
    Kassinis, George
    Vafeas, Nikos
    APPLIED ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2007, 14 (10) : 757 - 760
  • [40] A note on the spatial correlation structure of county-level growth in the US
    Wheeler, CH
    JOURNAL OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2001, 41 (03) : 433 - 449