RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF PIPELINE THIRD PARTY DAMAGE

被引:0
|
作者
Mehranfar, Mahsa [1 ]
Sen, Millan [1 ]
Lam, Christopher [2 ]
Bott, Steven [1 ]
机构
[1] Enbridge Liquids Pipelines, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Stantec, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Pipeline failure statistics indicate that mechanical damage caused by third-party excavation represents the largest threat to the integrity of onshore oil and gas pipelines in North America. In 1999, PRCI developed a reliability model that quantifies the pipeline probability of failure due to the 3rd party damage threat. The model employs a fault tree approach comprised of four main elements: the probability of excavation occurring on the pipeline alignment, the effectiveness of damage preventive measures, the probability that the excavation depth exceeds the depth of cover, and the probability that the excavator force is sufficient to fully penetrate the pipe wall. The PRCI model has been implemented by numerous operating companies over the past two decades. Despite this large contribution, there has been a gap in quantitative assessment techniques regarding the effectiveness of the methods used to prevent mechanical damage, and the pipelines resistance to the impact loads applied to pipelines by excavation equipment. In 2020 Enbridge applied this model to its 25,000+ km liquid pipeline system. During implementation numerous learnings and areas for improvement were identified. Correspondingly, the model was expanded to improve consideration of four important 3rd party damage threats that are not currently included within the model: agricultural activity, vehicle crossings, pipeline exposures, and mitigation activities. The results of this updated model showed that the probability of failure's due to 3rd party damage were generally increased at locations with high population density, agricultural land use, and road crossings, that exhibited shallow cover. It is expected that this updated model will assist in prioritizing the mitigation of various locations that are potentially susceptible to the 3rd party damage threat in alignment with operator expectations. This paper discusses the data gathering steps required for implementation, example probability of failure results, and provides the details of the model updates which may be incorporated by other operators.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Fuzzy fault tree analysis method for the third-party damage of Hangzhou Bay offshore pipeline
    Wang Qian
    Zhao Jianping
    ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY: RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2007, : 1273 - +
  • [22] Ettringite - cause of damage, damage intensifier or uninvolved third party?
    Stark, J
    Bollmann, K
    Seyfarth, K
    ZKG INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 51 (05): : 280 - 292
  • [23] A different kind of third-party damage
    Veazey, MV
    MATERIALS PERFORMANCE, 2005, 44 (02) : 16 - 17
  • [24] Pipeline safety management and the prevention of third-party interference
    Sljivic, Sue
    Pipes and Pipelines International, 1995, 40 (06): : 14 - 16
  • [25] CAPTURING BEST PRACTICES FOR THIRD PARTY INSPECTIONS OF PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION
    Montemurro, David
    McCaig, Kim
    Hoffmann, Richard
    Sahney, Reena
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 11TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE, 2016, VOL 2, 2017,
  • [26] Third-party carrier assessment
    Corkhill, M
    CHEMICAL WEEK, 1996, : T30 - T30
  • [27] Overall reliability analysis on oil/gas pipeline under typical third-party actions based on fragility theory
    Peng, Xing-yu
    Yao, Dong-chi
    Liang, Guang-chuan
    Yu, Jian-sheng
    He, Sha
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 34 : 993 - 1003
  • [28] Study on quantitative risk assessment model of the third party damage for natural gas pipelines based on fuzzy comprehensive assessment
    Qiu, Zeyang
    Liang, Wei
    Wang, Xue
    Lin, Yang
    Zhang, Meng
    12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DAMAGE ASSESSMENT OF STRUCTURES, 2017, 842
  • [29] INTELLIGENT PREVENTION METHOD FOR THIRD-PARTY DAMAGE OF LONG-DISTANCE PIPELINE BASED ON MOBILE DEVICES LOCATION INFORMATION
    Ling, Jiatong
    Zhang, Hang
    Dong, Shaohua
    Luo, Jinheng
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 2020 13TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE (IPC2020), VOL 2, 2020,
  • [30] BEST PRACTICES FOR THIRD PARTY PIPELINE DAMAGE RISK MANAGEMENT WITH SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENT RESPONSIBILITY - TRANSPETRO - PETROBRAS TRANSPORTE S.A
    Boszczowski, Eduardo Bomfim
    Aragonez de Vasconcellos, Carlos Renato
    da Cruz, Kleber Vinicius
    Pereira Filho, Ozias
    Cartagena, Sarah Marcela C.
    IPC2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE - 2008, VOL 4, 2009, : 183 - 191