Effects of Postoperative Gum Chewing on Recovery of Gastrointestinal Function Following Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:1
|
作者
Tuscharoenporn, Thunwipa [1 ]
Uruwankul, Kittithat [2 ]
Charoenkwan, Kittipat [1 ]
机构
[1] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
[2] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
关键词
gum chewing; gynecology; laparoscopy; ENHANCED RECOVERY; BOWEL MOTILITY;
D O I
10.3390/jcm13102851
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Chewing gum, considered a form of sham feeding, has been shown to improve intestinal motor and secretory function in various types of abdominal surgery. We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the effects of postoperative gum chewing on the recovery of gastrointestinal function after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Methods: We performed a comprehensive literature review of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, Embase, and a reference list of relevant studies from the inception to 11 March 2024, comparing postoperative gum chewing versus no gum chewing following laparoscopic gynecologic surgery regardless of indications and setting without language restriction. The primary outcome was the time to the presence of bowel sounds and the time to the first passage of flatus. Cochrane's risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias in included studies. Results: Nine RCTs with a total of 1011 patients were included. Overall, three studies were categorized as having a low risk of bias, three had some concerns, and three exhibited a high risk of bias. The time to the presence of bowel sounds (mean difference [MD] -2.66 h, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.68 to -1.64, p < 0.00001) and time to the first passage of flatus (MD -4.20 h, 95% CI -5.79 to -2.61, p < 0.00001) was significantly shorter in the gum-chewing group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups with regard to the time to the first defecation (MD -6.52 h, 95% CI -15.70 to 2.66, p = 0.16), time to the first postoperative mobilization (MD 24.05 min, 95% CI -38.16 to 86.26, p = 0.45), postoperative ileus (MD 0.68, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.19, p = 0.17), and length of hospital stay (MD -0.05 day, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.04, p = 0.28). Conclusions: Gum chewing following laparoscopic gynecologic surgery appears to promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function, as evidenced by a reduced time to the presence of bowel sounds and the first passage of flatus.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Chewing gum for intestinal function recovery after caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zunjia Wen
    Meifen Shen
    Chao Wu
    Jianping Ding
    Binbin Mei
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17
  • [42] Chewing gum for intestinal function recovery after caesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wen, Zunjia
    Shen, Meifen
    Wu, Chao
    Ding, Jianping
    Mei, Binbin
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2017, 17
  • [43] The effects of catechin on endothelial function: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Shafabakhsh, Rana
    Milajerdi, Alireza
    Reiner, Zeljko
    Kolahdooz, Fariba
    Amirani, Elaheh
    Mirzaei, Hamed
    Barekat, Maryam
    Asemi, Zatollah
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN FOOD SCIENCE AND NUTRITION, 2020, 60 (14) : 2369 - 2378
  • [44] Chewing gum and postoperative ileus in adults: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
    Su'a, Bruce U.
    Pollock, Terina T.
    Lemanu, Daniel P.
    MacCormick, Andrew D.
    Connolly, Andrew B.
    Hill, Andrew G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 14 : 49 - 55
  • [45] Association of gum chewing with early gastrointestinal recovery in single-port laparoscopic gynecologic surgery
    Yin, Ya-Nan
    Xie, Hong
    Jiang, Ni-Jie
    Dai, Li
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2023, 16 (03): : 66 - 74
  • [46] Effects of guar gum supplementation on the lipid profile: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Lin, Jianbei
    Sun, Yan
    Santos, Heitor O.
    Gaman, Mihnea-Alexandru
    Bhat, Latha T.
    Cui, Yan
    NUTRITION METABOLISM AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2021, 31 (12) : 3271 - 3281
  • [47] Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in randomized controlled trials: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Roh, Hyunsuk Frank
    Nam, Seung Hyuk
    Kim, Jung Mogg
    PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (01):
  • [48] Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhang, Feng-Wa
    Zhou, Zhao-Yu
    Wang, Hai-Lin
    Zhang, Jv-Xia
    Di, Bao-Shan
    Huang, Wen-Hui
    Yang, Ke-Hu
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (22) : 9985 - 9996
  • [49] The incidence of urinary tract infection of different routes of catheterization following gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Meixuan Li
    Liang Yao
    Caiwen Han
    Huijuan Li
    Yangqin Xun
    Peijing Yan
    Meng Wang
    Wenbo He
    Cuncun Lu
    Kehu Yang
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2019, 30 : 523 - 535
  • [50] The incidence of urinary tract infection of different routes of catheterization following gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Li, Meixuan
    Yao, Liang
    Han, Caiwen
    Li, Huijuan
    Xun, Yangqin
    Yan, Peijing
    Wang, Meng
    He, Wenbo
    Lu, Cuncun
    Yang, Kehu
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 30 (04) : 523 - 535