Is liquidity provision informative? Evidence from agricultural futures markets

被引:1
|
作者
Ma, Richie R. [1 ]
Serra, Teresa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Agr & Consumer Econ, Off Futures & Opt Res, 1301 W Gregory Dr, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
futures markets; limit orders; liquidity; microstructure; price discovery; PRICE DISCOVERY; REALIZED VARIANCE; TRADERS; CORN; COMPONENTS; BIASES; ASK;
D O I
10.1111/ajae.12479
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Electronic commodity trading witnesses a massive volume of order messages every trading day, but little is known about their informativeness. We examine limit order dynamics and their role in price discovery in the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) corn, soybean, and wheat futures markets from January 2019 to June 2020, using order-level data. Between 75% and 79% of the large number of limit orders submitted are then deleted, which contrasts with the much smaller proportion getting executed or revised. Aggressive trades and limit orders substantially contribute to price discovery, whereas nonaggressive trades and limit orders, representing most market events, play a minor role. Following public information releases, there is a shift in trading strategies, with trades contributing more to price discovery and aggressive limit orders contributing less, compared to nonrelease days. Our findings suggest that most limit orders in agricultural futures markets continue to play the traditional role of uninformed liquidity provision.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 151
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] STRATEGIC LIQUIDITY PROVISION IN LIMIT ORDER MARKETS
    Back, Kerry
    Baruch, Shmuel
    ECONOMETRICA, 2013, 81 (01) : 363 - 392
  • [22] LIQUIDITY PROVISION IN CAPACITY-CONSTRAINED MARKETS
    Weill, Pierre-Olivier
    MACROECONOMIC DYNAMICS, 2011, 15 : 119 - 144
  • [23] Slippage in futures markets: Evidence from the Sydney futures exchange
    Frino, A
    Oetomo, T
    JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 2005, 25 (12) : 1129 - 1146
  • [24] Measuring liquidity in agricultural land markets
    Kionka, Marlene
    Odening, Martin
    Plogmann, Jana
    Ritter, Matthias
    AGRICULTURAL FINANCE REVIEW, 2022, 82 (04) : 690 - 713
  • [25] The cross-market dynamic effects of liquidity on volatility: evidence from Chinese stock index and futures markets
    Qiao, Gaoxiu
    Teng, Yuxin
    Xu, Yanyan
    Wang, Lu
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 52 (01) : 85 - 99
  • [26] Market liquidity and macro announcement around intraday jumps: Evidence from Chinese stock index futures markets
    Sun, Bianxia
    Gao, Yang
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2020, 541
  • [27] Forecasting the daily dynamic hedge ratios by GARCH models: evidence from the agricultural futures markets
    Zhang, Yuanyuan
    Choudhry, Taufiq
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2015, 21 (04): : 376 - 399
  • [28] Should dominant contracts move to nearby months?--Evidence from Chinese agricultural futures markets
    Xie, Wei
    An, Yi
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2023, 55 (41) : 4817 - 4840
  • [29] Market Makers and Liquidity Premium in Electricity Futures Markets
    Ignacio Pena, Juan
    Rodriguez, Rosa
    ENERGY JOURNAL, 2022, 43 (02): : 91 - 110
  • [30] Commonality in liquidity across options and stock futures markets
    Benzennou, Bouchra
    ap Gwilym, Owain
    Williams, Gwion
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 32