Learning by Cheating

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Dian [1 ]
Zhou, Brady [1 ,2 ]
Koltun, Vladlen [2 ]
Krahenbuhl, Philipp [1 ]
机构
[1] UT Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Intel Labs, Hillsboro, OR USA
来源
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Autonomous driving; imitation learning; sensorimotor control;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Vision-based urban driving is hard. The autonomous system needs to learn to perceive the world and act in it. We show that this challenging learning problem can be simplified by decomposing it into two stages. We first train an agent that has access to privileged information. This privileged agent cheats by observing the ground-truth layout of the environment and the positions of all traffic participants. In the second stage, the privileged agent acts as a teacher that trains a purely vision-based sensorimotor agent. The resulting sensorimotor agent does not have access to any privileged information and does not cheat. This two-stage training procedure is counter-intuitive at first, but has a number of important advantages that we analyze and empirically demonstrate. We use the presented approach to train a vision-based autonomous driving system that substantially outperforms the state of the art on the CARLA benchmark and the recent NoCrash benchmark. Our approach achieves, for the first time, 100% success rate on all tasks in the original CARLA benchmark, sets a new record on the NoCrash benchmark, and reduces the frequency of infractions by an order of magnitude compared to the prior state of the art.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cheating - Or Collaborative Learning?
    Holub, Peter
    [J]. INTERNET JOURNAL OF ALLIED HEALTH SCIENCES AND PRACTICE, 2008, 6 (03):
  • [2] Collaborative exams: Cheating? Or learning?
    Jang, Hyewon
    Lasry, Nathaniel
    Miller, Kelly
    Mazur, Eric
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2017, 85 (03) : 223 - 227
  • [3] Identifying cheating behaviour with machine learning
    Kock, Elina
    Sarwari, Yamma
    Russo, Nancy
    Johnsson, Magnus
    [J]. 33RD WORKSHOP OF THE SWEDISH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SOCIETY (SAIS 2021), 2021, : 29 - 32
  • [4] Learning statistics by computer software is cheating
    Maltby, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2001, 17 (03) : 329 - 330
  • [5] Tests and academic cheating: do learning tasks influence cheating by way of negative evaluations?
    Wenzel, Kristin
    Reinhard, Marc-Andre
    [J]. SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY OF EDUCATION, 2020, 23 (03) : 721 - 753
  • [6] Tests and academic cheating: do learning tasks influence cheating by way of negative evaluations?
    Kristin Wenzel
    Marc-André Reinhard
    [J]. Social Psychology of Education, 2020, 23 : 721 - 753
  • [7] Cheating in virtual worlds: transgressive designs for learning
    Kafai, Yasmin
    Fields, Deborah
    [J]. ON THE HORIZON, 2009, 17 (01) : 12 - +
  • [8] Cheating and Creativity in Pervasive Games in Learning Contexts
    Ejsing-Duun, Stine
    Hanghoj, Thorkild
    Karoff, Helle Skovbjerg
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON GAMES BASED LEARNING, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2013, : 149 - 155
  • [9] Cheating Lessons: Learning from Academic Dishonesty
    Woolway, Demere
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 107 (03): : 253 - 253
  • [10] Cheating and Incentives: Learning from a Policy Experiment
    Martinelli, Cesar
    Parker, Susan W.
    Perez-Gea, Ana Cristina
    Rodrigo, Rodimiro
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2018, 10 (01) : 298 - 325