Seasonal variation in ambulatory blood pressure control in patients on clinic blood pressure-guided antihypertensive treatment

被引:0
|
作者
Ye, Xiao-Fei [1 ]
Wang, Wen-Yuan-Yue [1 ]
Wang, Xin-Yu [1 ]
Huang, Qi-Fang [2 ]
Sheng, Chang-Sheng [2 ]
Li, Yan [2 ]
Wang, Ji-Guang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Sch Med, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ruijin Hosp, Shanghai Inst Hypertens, Dept Cardiovasc Med,Sch Med,Ctr Epidemiol Studies, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Res Inst Hypertens, Ruijin 2nd Rd 197, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ambulatory blood pressure; autumn/winter; daytime; nighttime; nondipper; seasonal variation; spring/summer; NOCTURNAL HYPERTENSION; OUTDOOR TEMPERATURE; 24; H; DISEASE; MORTALITY; OFFICE; ASSOCIATION; HOME;
D O I
10.1097/HJH.0000000000003666
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background: We investigated seasonal variation in ambulatory blood pressure control in hypertensive patients on clinic blood pressure-guided antihypertensive treatment. Methods: The study participants were hypertensive patients enrolled in an 8-week therapeutic study. Antihypertensive treatment was initiated with long-acting dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers amlodipine 5 mg/day or the gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation of nifedipine 30 mg/day, with the possible up-titration to amlodipine 10 mg/day or nifedipine-GITS 60 mg/day at 4 weeks of follow-up. Results: The proportion of up-titration to higher dosages of antihypertensive drugs at 4 weeks of follow-up was higher in patients who commenced treatment in autumn/winter (n = 302) than those who commenced treatment in spring/summer (n = 199, 24.5 vs. 12.0%, P < 0.001). The control rate of clinic blood pressure, however, was lower in autumn/winter than in spring/summer at 4 (56.7 vs. 70.7%, P = 0.003) and 8 weeks of follow-up (52.5 vs. 74.9%, P < 0.001). At 8 weeks, patients who commenced treatment in autumn/winter, compared with those who commenced treatment in spring/summer, had a significantly (P <= 0.03) smaller daytime (mean between-season difference -3.2/-2.8 mmHg) but greater nighttime SBP/DBP reduction (3.6/1.6 mmHg). Accordingly, at 8 weeks, the prevalence of nondippers was significantly (P < 0.001) higher in spring/summer than in autumn/winter for both SBP (54.8 vs. 30.0%) and DBP (53.4 vs. 28.8%). Conclusion: Clinic blood pressure-guided antihypertensive treatment requires a higher dosage of medication in cold than warm seasons, which may have led to over- and under-treatment of nighttime blood pressure, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:909 / 916
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinic Versus Daytime Ambulatory Blood Pressure Difference in Hypertensive Patients The Impact of Age and Clinic Blood Pressure
    Banegas, Jose R.
    Ruilope, Luis M.
    de la Sierra, Alejandro
    Vinyoles, Ernest
    Gorostidi, Manuel
    de la Cruz, Juan J.
    Segura, Julian
    Oliveras, Anna
    Martell, Nieves
    Garcia-Puig, Juan
    Williams, Bryan
    [J]. HYPERTENSION, 2017, 69 (02) : 211 - +
  • [22] ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUG TREATMENT FOR FIRST TRIMESTER HYPERTENSION GUIDED BY SERIAL AMBULATORY BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING
    Gryglas, P.
    Jedrusik, P.
    Wojciechowska, E.
    Gryglas, A.
    Dabrowski, M.
    Symonides, B.
    Gaciong, Z.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2017, 35 : E259 - E259
  • [23] Comparison of ambulatory blood pressure and clinic blood pressure in relation to cardiovascular diseases in diabetic patients
    Shen, Jian
    Li, Zhi-Ming
    He, Li-Zhen
    Deng, Ren-Sheng
    Liu, Jing-Guang
    Shen, Yuan-Sheng
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (33)
  • [24] ANALYSIS OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY AND BLOOD PRESSURE CONTROL IN OUTPATIENT CLINIC
    Zhao, Xiexiong
    Jiang, Weihong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2018, 36 : E318 - E318
  • [25] Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring - comparison with office blood pressure in patients on antihypertensive therapy in private practice
    Ker, JA
    van Wyk, CJ
    Rheeder, P
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 88 (02): : 133 - 135
  • [26] Ambulatory blood pressure is more sensitive than office blood pressure to detect antihypertensive treatment effects in hypertensive patients.
    Vesalainen, RK
    Johansson, JM
    Kantola, IM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1999, 12 (04) : 148A - 148A
  • [27] SEASONAL DIFFERENCES IN BLOOD PRESSURE PHENOTYPES: EFFICACY OF ANTIHYPERTENSIVE TREATMENT
    Smirnova, M.
    Gorbunov, V.
    Boytsov, S.
    Loukianov, M.
    Volkov, D.
    Deev, A.
    Koshelyaevskaya, Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2016, 34 : E120 - E120
  • [28] BLOOD-PRESSURE VARIATION IN AMBULATORY HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
    CRAIG, MWM
    MANN, S
    BALASUBRAMANIAN, V
    RAFTERY, EB
    [J]. CLINICAL SCIENCE AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 1978, 55 (03): : P18 - P18
  • [30] Blood pressure control in Type 2 diabetes patients (clinic and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitor comparison)
    Salim, M.
    Aung, M.
    Jones, T. H.
    Merza, Z.
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2008, 25