A methodological framework for rigorous systematic reviews: Tailoring comprehensive analyses to clinicians and healthcare professionals

被引:3
|
作者
Mancin, Stefano [1 ]
Sguanci, Marco [2 ]
Anastasi, Giuliano [3 ]
Godino, Lea [4 ]
Lo Cascio, Alessio [1 ]
Morenghi, Emanuela [5 ]
Piredda, Michela [2 ]
De Marinis, Maria Grazia [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Biomed & Prevent, Viale Montpellier 1, I-00128 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Campus Biomed, Dept Med & Surg, Res Unit Nursing Sci, Rome, Italy
[3] AOU G Martino Univ Hosp, Dept Trauma, Messina, Italy
[4] IRCCS Azienda Osped Univ Bologna, Med Genet Unit, Bologna, Italy
[5] IRCCS Humanitas Res Hosp, Milan, Italy
[6] Fdn Policlin Univ, Campus Biomed, Rome, Italy
关键词
Evidence-based medicine; Systematic review; Method; Clinicians; Healthcare professionals; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.03.006
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Systematic reviews represent a fundamental study design, providing the highest level of evidence across diverse research inquiries, encompassing both public health and clinical research and practice. However, for healthcare professionals, the process of selecting, synthesizing, and interpreting evidence can be challenging, and requires specialized skills. Therefore, it is imperative to explore innovative solutions aimed at simplifying and making the traditional systematic review process more accessible while ensuring the validity and reliability of results. In this perspective, our research objective is to develop a systematic review framework that, while maintaining a rigorous methodological approach, streamlines the process for healthcare professionals. This study describes such approach in every phase, from the collection of evidence to the writing of the text, creating a guide for the healthcare professional who approaches this type of research. The qualitative and organizational analysis tools are also described, providing useful information for the use of non-paid programs. This systematic review aims to develop a framework with a rigorous methodological approach that allows simplify the process for clinicians and healthcare professionals. The implementation of this methodology in clinical practice offers new perspectives to ensure a thoughtful consideration and application of scientific evidence and opens the way to innovative and easily accessible solutions to facilitate the conduct of systematic reviews in the clinical care setting.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 43
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Published in High-Impact Otolaryngology Journals
    Martinez-Monedero, Rodrigo
    Danielian, Arman
    Angajala, Varun
    Dinalo, Jennifer E.
    Kezirian, Eric J.
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2020, 163 (05) : 892 - 905
  • [42] Methodological Quality Assessment of Meta-Analyses and Systematic Reviews of Probiotics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Pouchitis
    Dong, Jinpei
    Teng, Guigen
    Wei, Tiantong
    Gao, Wen
    Wang, Huahong
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (12):
  • [43] Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses
    Baudard, Marie
    Yavchitz, Amelie
    Ravaud, Philippe
    Perrodeau, Elodie
    Boutron, Isabelle
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 356 : 1 - 7
  • [44] The reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - A systematic review
    Sun, Xiao
    Wang, Duo
    Wang, Mei
    Li, Han
    Liu, Bo
    [J]. NURSING OPEN, 2021, 8 (03): : 1489 - 1500
  • [45] A comprehensive examination of research instruments utilized for assessing the attitudes of healthcare professionals towards the use of restraints in mental healthcare: A systematic review
    Bachmann, Liv
    Odegard, Atle
    Mundal, Ingunn Pernille
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2024, 80 (07) : 2728 - 2745
  • [46] Methodological Concerns and Quality Appraisal of Contemporary Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses in Pediatric Urology EDITORIAL COMMENT
    Greenfield, Saul P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (01): : 271 - 272
  • [47] Methodological issues of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the field of sleep medicine: A meta-epidemiological study
    Xu, Chang
    Furuya-Kanamori, Luis
    Kwong, Joey S. W.
    Li, Sheng
    Liu, Yu
    Doi, Suhail A.
    [J]. SLEEP MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2021, 57
  • [48] Q-Coh: A tool to screen the methodological quality of cohort studies in systematic reviews and meta-analyses
    Jarde, Alexander
    Losilla, Josep-Maria
    Vives, Jaume
    Rodrigo, Maria F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 13 (02) : 138 - 146
  • [49] Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions
    Page, Matthew J.
    McKenzie, Joanne E.
    Kirkham, Jamie
    Dwan, Kerry
    Kramer, Sharon
    Green, Sally
    Forbes, Andrew
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2014, (10):
  • [50] Bias due to selective inclusion and reporting of outcomes and analyses in systematic reviews of randomised trials of healthcare interventions
    Moro-Tejedor, M. N.
    Regaira-Martinez, E.
    [J]. ENFERMERIA INTENSIVA, 2021, 32 (01): : 45 - 47