A methodological framework for rigorous systematic reviews: Tailoring comprehensive analyses to clinicians and healthcare professionals

被引:3
|
作者
Mancin, Stefano [1 ]
Sguanci, Marco [2 ]
Anastasi, Giuliano [3 ]
Godino, Lea [4 ]
Lo Cascio, Alessio [1 ]
Morenghi, Emanuela [5 ]
Piredda, Michela [2 ]
De Marinis, Maria Grazia [2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Roma Tor Vergata, Dept Biomed & Prevent, Viale Montpellier 1, I-00128 Rome, Italy
[2] Univ Campus Biomed, Dept Med & Surg, Res Unit Nursing Sci, Rome, Italy
[3] AOU G Martino Univ Hosp, Dept Trauma, Messina, Italy
[4] IRCCS Azienda Osped Univ Bologna, Med Genet Unit, Bologna, Italy
[5] IRCCS Humanitas Res Hosp, Milan, Italy
[6] Fdn Policlin Univ, Campus Biomed, Rome, Italy
关键词
Evidence-based medicine; Systematic review; Method; Clinicians; Healthcare professionals; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.03.006
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Systematic reviews represent a fundamental study design, providing the highest level of evidence across diverse research inquiries, encompassing both public health and clinical research and practice. However, for healthcare professionals, the process of selecting, synthesizing, and interpreting evidence can be challenging, and requires specialized skills. Therefore, it is imperative to explore innovative solutions aimed at simplifying and making the traditional systematic review process more accessible while ensuring the validity and reliability of results. In this perspective, our research objective is to develop a systematic review framework that, while maintaining a rigorous methodological approach, streamlines the process for healthcare professionals. This study describes such approach in every phase, from the collection of evidence to the writing of the text, creating a guide for the healthcare professional who approaches this type of research. The qualitative and organizational analysis tools are also described, providing useful information for the use of non-paid programs. This systematic review aims to develop a framework with a rigorous methodological approach that allows simplify the process for clinicians and healthcare professionals. The implementation of this methodology in clinical practice offers new perspectives to ensure a thoughtful consideration and application of scientific evidence and opens the way to innovative and easily accessible solutions to facilitate the conduct of systematic reviews in the clinical care setting.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 43
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
    Pollock, Michelle
    Fernandes, Ricardo M.
    Hartling, Lisa
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17 : 48
  • [2] Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions
    Michelle Pollock
    Ricardo M. Fernandes
    Lisa Hartling
    [J]. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17
  • [3] Quality of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of resveratrol: A methodological systematic review
    Lu, Cuncun
    Ke, Lixin
    Zhang, Qiang
    Deng, Xiuxiu
    Shang, Wenru
    Zhao, Xiaoxiao
    Li, Yuanyuan
    Xie, Yanming
    Wang, Zhifei
    [J]. PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2024, 38 (01) : 11 - 21
  • [4] Systematic Reviews of Systematic Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Studies Reviews in Healthcare Research: How to Assess the Methodological Quality of Included Reviews?
    Rouleau, Genevieve
    Quan Nha Hong
    Kaur, Navdeep
    Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
    Cote, Jose
    Bouix-Picasso, Julien
    Pluye, Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIXED METHODS RESEARCH, 2023, 17 (01) : 51 - 69
  • [5] Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Endodontics
    Nagendrababu, Venkateshbabu
    Pulikkotil, Shaju Jacob
    Sultan, Omer Sheriff
    Jayaraman, Jayakumar
    Peters, Ove A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2018, 44 (06) : 903 - 913
  • [6] Are interventions delivered by healthcare professionals effective for weight management? A systematic review of systematic reviews
    Epton, Tracy
    Keyworth, Christopher
    Goldthorpe, Joanna
    Calam, Rachel
    Armitage, Christopher J.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION, 2022, 25 (04) : 1071 - 1083
  • [7] Best Practice Guidelines and Essential Methodological Steps to Conduct Rigorous and Systematic Meta-Reviews
    Hennessy, Emily A.
    Johnson, Blair T.
    Keenan, Ciara
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-HEALTH AND WELL BEING, 2019, 11 (03) : 353 - 381
  • [8] ‘Engagement’ of patients and healthcare professionals in regulatory pharmacovigilance: establishing a conceptual and methodological framework
    Patrick Brown
    Priya Bahri
    [J]. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2019, 75 : 1181 - 1192
  • [9] 'Engagement' of patients and healthcare professionals in regulatory pharmacovigilance: establishing a conceptual and methodological framework
    Brown, Patrick
    Bahri, Priya
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 75 (09) : 1181 - 1192
  • [10] Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review
    Bafeta, Aida
    Trinquart, Ludovic
    Seror, Raphaele
    Ravaud, Philippe
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 347