A Comparative Analysis of Polynomial Regression and Artificial Neural Networks for Prediction of Lighting Consumption

被引:2
|
作者
Belany, Pavol [1 ]
Hrabovsky, Peter [1 ]
Sedivy, Stefan [1 ]
Kantova, Nikola Cajova [1 ]
Florkova, Zuzana [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zilina, Res Ctr, Univ 8215-1, Zilina 01026, Slovakia
关键词
lighting consumption; polynomial regression analysis; daylight; prediction; measurement; artificial neural network; machine learning; ENERGY-CONSUMPTION; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/buildings14061712
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This article presents a comparative analysis of two prominent machine learning techniques for predicting electricity consumption in workplace lighting systems: polynomial regression analysis and artificial neural networks. The primary objective is to assess their suitability and applicability for developing an accurate predictive model. After a brief overview of the current state of energy-saving techniques, the article examines several established models for predicting energy consumption in buildings and systems. These models include artificial neural networks, regression analysis and support vector machines. It then focuses on a practical comparison between polynomial regression analysis and an artificial neural network-based model. The article then looks at the data preparation process, outlining how the data is used within each model to establish appropriate prediction functions. Finally, it describes the methods used to evaluate the accuracy of the developed prediction functions. These functions allow the prediction of lighting consumption based on external lighting intensity. The article evaluates the accuracy of the developed prediction functions using the root mean square error, correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination values. The article compares these values obtained for both models, allowing a conclusive assessment of which model provides superior accuracy in predicting lighting consumption based on external lighting intensity.
引用
收藏
页数:40
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Comparative Analysis of Artificial Neural Network and Support Vector Regression for River Suspended Sediment Load Prediction
    Hazarika, Barenya Bikash
    Gupta, Deepak
    Ashu
    Berlin, Mohanadhas
    FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE TECHNOLOGIES FOR COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 1045 : 339 - 349
  • [32] Artificial neural networks, quantile regression, and linear regression for site index prediction in the presence of outliers
    Araujo Junior, Carlos Alberto
    de Souza, Pabulo Diogo
    de Assis, Adriana Leandra
    Cabacinha, Christian Dias
    Leite, Helio Garcia
    Boechat Soares, Carlos Pedro
    Lopes da Silva, Antonilmar Araujo
    Oliveira Castro, Renato Vinicius
    PESQUISA AGROPECUARIA BRASILEIRA, 2019, 54
  • [33] Thermal analysis of batteries and prediction with artificial neural networks
    Yetik, Ozge
    AIRCRAFT ENGINEERING AND AEROSPACE TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 96 (07): : 888 - 899
  • [34] Comparative Analysis of the Classical and Nonclassical Artificial Neural Networks
    Lisitsa, Daria
    Zhilenkov, Anton A.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 IEEE RUSSIA SECTION YOUNG RESEARCHERS IN ELECTRICAL AND ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (2017 ELCONRUS), 2017, : 922 - 925
  • [35] Rock Brittleness Prediction Using Geomechanical Properties of Hamekasi Limestone: Regression and Artificial Neural Networks Analysis
    Ghobadi, Mohammad Hosein
    Naseri, Fateme
    GEOPERSIA, 2016, 6 (01): : 19 - 33
  • [36] Comparative study of artificial neural networks and multiple regression analysis for predicting hoisting times of tower cranes
    Leung, AWT
    Tam, CM
    Liu, DK
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 36 (04) : 457 - 467
  • [37] Comparative analysis of the prediction and classification accuracy of artificial neural networks with respect to traditional statistical methods
    Belman-Lopez, Carlos E.
    Jimenez-Garcia, Jose A.
    Vazquez-Lopez, Jose A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL OPTIMIZATION PROBLEMS AND INFORMATICS, 2021, 12 (02): : 7 - 15
  • [38] A comparative analysis of tool wear prediction using response surface methodology and artificial neural networks
    Premnath, A. A.
    Alwarsamy, T.
    Sugapriya, K.
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 12 (01) : 38 - 48
  • [39] Prediction of feed abrasive value by artificial neural networks and multiple linear regression
    M. A. Norouzian
    S. Asadpour
    Neural Computing and Applications, 2012, 21 : 905 - 909
  • [40] Water Demand Prediction using Artificial Neural Networks and Support Vector Regression
    Msiza, Ishmael S.
    Nelwamondo, Fulufhelo V.
    Marwala, Tshilidzi
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS, 2008, 3 (11) : 1 - 8