Assessment of Calcaneal Spongy Bone Magnetic Resonance Characteristics in Women: A Comparison between Measures Obtained at 0.3 T, 1.5 T, and 3.0 T

被引:0
|
作者
Capuani, Silvia [1 ,2 ]
Maiuro, Alessandra [1 ,3 ]
Giampa, Emiliano [4 ]
Montuori, Marco [1 ]
Varrucciu, Viviana [5 ]
Hagberg, Gisela E. [6 ]
Vinicola, Vincenzo [4 ]
Colonna, Sergio [5 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, CNR ISC, Phys Dept, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[2] IRCCS Rome, Santa Lucia Fdn, Neuroimaging Lab, Via Ardeatina 309, I-00179 Rome, Italy
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Phys Dept, Pzle Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[4] IRCCS Rome, Rehabil Hosp, Santa Lucia Fdn, Via Ardeatina 309, I-00179 Rome, Italy
[5] IRCCS Rome, Santa Lucia Fdn, Radiol Dept, Via Ardeatina 309, I-00179 Rome, Italy
[6] Max Planck Inst Biol Cybernet, High Field Magnet Resonance, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
MRI; low magnetic field; high magnetic field; spongy bone; bone marrow fat; SINGLE-SIDED NMR; HIGH-RESOLUTION MRI; TRABECULAR BONE; MARROW FAT; LOW-FIELD; CANCELLOUS BONE; VOLUME FRACTION; HUMAN BRAIN; OSTEOPOROSIS; DIFFUSION;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics14101050
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: There is a growing interest in bone tissue MRI and an even greater interest in using low-cost MR scanners. However, the characteristics of bone MRI remain to be fully defined, especially at low field strength. This study aimed to characterize the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), T2, and T2* in spongy bone at 0.3 T, 1.5 T, and 3.0 T. Furthermore, relaxation times were characterized as a function of bone-marrow lipid/water ratio content and trabecular bone density. Methods: Thirty-two women in total underwent an MR-imaging investigation of the calcaneus at 0.3 T, 1.5 T, and 3.0 T. MR-spectroscopy was performed at 3.0 T to assess the fat/water ratio. SNR, T2, and T2* were quantified in distinct calcaneal regions (ST, TC, and CC). ANOVA and Pearson correlation statistics were used. Results: SNR increase depends on the magnetic field strength, acquisition sequence, and calcaneal location. T2* was different at 3.0 T and 1.5 T in ST, TC, and CC. Relaxation times decrease as much as the magnetic field strength increases. The significant linear correlation between relaxation times and fat/water found in healthy young is lost in osteoporotic subjects. Conclusion: The results have implications for the possible use of relaxation vs. lipid/water marrow content for bone quality assessment and the development of quantitative MRI diagnostics at low field strength.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prostate Cancer Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Imaging at 1.5 and 3.0 T: A Meta-Analysis
    Chen, Huiyou
    Sutedjo, Janesya
    Wang, Liwei
    Yin, Xindao
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2016, 15 (04) : 625 - 631
  • [32] Comparison of phased-array 3.0-T and endorectal 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local staging accuracy for prostate cancer
    Park, Byung Kwan
    Kim, Bohyun
    Kim, Chan Kyo
    Lee, Hyun Moo
    Kwon, Ghee Young
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2007, 31 (04) : 534 - 538
  • [33] Impact of an endorectal coil for 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the prostate at 3.0 T in comparison to 1.5 T: Do we need an endorectal coil?
    Hoffner, Maximilian K. M.
    Huebner, Frank
    Scholtz, Jan Erik
    Zangos, Stephan
    Schulz, Boris
    Luboldt, Wolfgang
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    Bodelle, Boris
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (08) : 1432 - 1438
  • [34] Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging - Comparison of 1.5 T and 3.0 T imaging for detection of focal malignant liver lesions
    Chang, JM
    Lee, JM
    Lee, MW
    Choi, JY
    Kim, SH
    Lee, JY
    Han, JK
    Choi, BI
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2006, 41 (02) : 168 - 174
  • [35] T1-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Small Bowel Comparison Between 1.5 and 7 T
    Hahnemann, Maria L.
    Kraff, Oliver
    Orzada, Stephan
    Umutlu, Lale
    Kinner, Sonja
    Ladd, Mark E.
    Quick, Harald H.
    Lauenstein, Thomas C.
    INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2015, 50 (08) : 539 - 547
  • [36] Discretized solenoid design of a 1.5 T and a 3.0 T REBCO wholebody MRI magnets with cost comparison according to magnetic flux
    Jung, Wonju
    Kim, Geonyoung
    Choi, Kibum
    Park, Hyunsoo
    Hahn, Seungyong
    PROGRESS IN SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND CRYOGENICS, 2023, 25 (04): : 75 - 80
  • [37] Qualitative Comparison of 0.27T, 1.5T, and 3T Magnetic Resonance Images of the Normal Equine Foot
    Bolen, Geraldine
    Audigie, Fabrice
    Spriet, Mathieu
    Vandenberghe, Filip
    Busoni, Valeria
    JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2010, 30 (01) : 9 - 20
  • [38] Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance – preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T
    Beverly Tsai-Goodman
    Meng Yuan Zhu
    Mashael Al-Rujaib
    Mike Seed
    Christopher K Macgowan
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 17
  • [39] Foetal blood flow measured using phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance - preliminary data comparing 1.5 T with 3.0 T
    Tsai-Goodman, Beverly
    Zhu, Meng Yuan
    Al-Rujaib, Mashael
    Seed, Mike
    Macgowan, Christopher K.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2015, 17
  • [40] Orthodontic springs and auxiliary appliances: assessment of magnetic field interactions associated with 1.5 T and 3 T magnetic resonance systems
    Kemper, J.
    Priest, A. N.
    Schulze, D.
    Kahl-Nieke, B.
    Adam, G.
    Klocke, A.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (02) : 533 - 540