Systematic review of MRI safety literature in relation to radiofrequency thermal injury prevention

被引:1
|
作者
Baker, Cassandra [1 ,2 ]
Nugent, Barbara [2 ,3 ]
Grainger, David [4 ]
Hewis, Johnathan [5 ]
Malamateniou, Christina [2 ]
机构
[1] Qscan Radiol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] City Univ London, Sch Hlth & Psychol Sci, Dept Radiog, Div Midwifery & Radiog, London, England
[3] MRI Safety Matters, Edinburgh, Scotland
[4] Med & Healthcare Prod Regulatory Agcy, London, England
[5] Charles Sturt Univ, Sch Dent & Med Sci, Port Macquarie, NSW, Australia
关键词
Adverse events; magnetic resonance imaging; physics; radiographer; research - systematic review; INDUCED SKIN BURN; IMAGING SAFETY; LOWER-EXTREMITIES; PATIENT; TATTOO; TECHNOLOGY; ISSUES; 3-TESLA; PHYSICS; FINGER;
D O I
10.1002/jmrs.800
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
IntroductionMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a rapidly evolving modality, generally considered safe due to lack of ionising radiation. While MRI technology and techniques are improving, many of the safety concerns remain the same as when first established. Patient thermal injuries are the most frequently reported adverse event, accounting for 59% of MRI incidents to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Surveys indicate many incidents remain unreported. Patient thermal injuries are preventable and various methods for their mitigation have been published. However, recommendations can be variable, fragmented and confusing. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the evidence on MRI safety and associated skin injuries and offer comprehensive recommendations for radiographers to prevent skin thermal injuries.IntroductionMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a rapidly evolving modality, generally considered safe due to lack of ionising radiation. While MRI technology and techniques are improving, many of the safety concerns remain the same as when first established. Patient thermal injuries are the most frequently reported adverse event, accounting for 59% of MRI incidents to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Surveys indicate many incidents remain unreported. Patient thermal injuries are preventable and various methods for their mitigation have been published. However, recommendations can be variable, fragmented and confusing. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise the evidence on MRI safety and associated skin injuries and offer comprehensive recommendations for radiographers to prevent skin thermal injuries.MethodsFour journal databases were searched for sources published January 2010-May 2023, presenting information on MRI safety and thermal injuries.ResultsOf 26,801 articles returned, after careful screening and based on the eligibility criteria, only 79 articles and an additional 19 grey literature sources were included (n = 98). Included studies were examined using thematic analysis to determine if holistic recommendations can be provided to assist in preventing skin burns. This resulted in three simplified recommendations: Remove any electrically conductive items Insulate the patient to prevent any conductive loops or contact with objects Communicate regularlyConclusionBy implementing the above recommendations, it is estimated that 97% of skin burns could be prevented. With thermal injuries continuing to impact MRI safety, strategies to prevent skin burns and heating are essential. Assessing individual risks, rather than blanket policies, will help prevent skin thermal injuries occurring, improving patient care. A systematic review was performed of all MRI safety literature from 2010 to 2023 and analysed to determine if risks and prevention of radiofrequency thermal injuries were well documented. This was found to be quite fragmented so three key safe practice recommendations are suggested to prevent MRI thermal injuries. image
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic literature review on LNG safety at ports
    Aneziris, Olga
    Koromila, Ioanna
    Nivolianitou, Zoe
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2020, 124
  • [32] Bicycle safety at roundabouts: a systematic literature review
    Poudel, Niranjan
    Singleton, Patrick A.
    TRANSPORT REVIEWS, 2021, 41 (05) : 617 - 642
  • [33] Safety climate in construction: a systematic literature review
    Xia, Nini
    Ding, Sichao
    Ling, Tao
    Tang, Yuchun
    ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION AND ARCHITECTURAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 31 (10) : 3973 - 4000
  • [34] A systematic literature review on LNG safety at ports
    Aneziris, Olga
    Koromila, Ioanna
    Nivolianitou, Zoe
    Aneziris, Olga (olga@ipta.demokritos.gr), 1600, Elsevier B.V., Netherlands (124):
  • [36] Imaging in Lisfranc injury: a systematic literature review
    Sripanich, Yantarat
    Weinberg, Maxwell W.
    Kraehenbuehl, Nicola
    Rungprai, Chamnanni
    Mills, Megan K.
    Saltzman, Charles L.
    Barg, Alexej
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 49 (01) : 31 - 53
  • [37] Imaging in Lisfranc injury: a systematic literature review
    Yantarat Sripanich
    Maxwell W. Weinberg
    Nicola Krähenbühl
    Chamnanni Rungprai
    Megan K. Mills
    Charles L. Saltzman
    Alexej Barg
    Skeletal Radiology, 2020, 49 : 31 - 53
  • [38] Imaging in syndesmotic injury: a systematic literature review
    Krahenbuhl, Nicola
    Weinberg, Maxwell W.
    Davidson, Nathan P.
    Mills, Megan K.
    Hintermann, Beat
    Saltzman, Charles L.
    Barg, Alexej
    SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2018, 47 (05) : 631 - 648
  • [39] Sustainable Safety Management: A Safety Competencies Systematic Literature Review
    Rahman, Fazil A.
    Arifin, Kadir
    Abas, Azlan
    Mahfudz, Mahfudz
    Basir Cyio, Muhammad
    Khairil, Muhammad
    Ali, Muhammad Nur
    Lampe, Ilyas
    Samad, Muhammad Ahsan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (11)
  • [40] Efficacy and safety of neural stem cell therapy for spinal cord injury A systematic literature review
    Tiwari, Santosh
    Khan, Shaswati
    Kumar, Shiva, V
    Rajak, Rohit
    Sultana, Asma
    Pasha, Shaik Abjal
    Gauba, Divya
    Ghosh, Pinaki
    Khurana, Tanu
    Kulkarni, Aishwarya
    Reddy, Yugandhar P.
    Khan, Aleem A.
    Sharma, Varun Kumar
    THERAPIE, 2021, 76 (03): : 201 - 210