Inconsistencies between prenatal diagnostic and genetic testing laboratories on variant validation of rare monogenic diseases

被引:0
|
作者
Lin, Liling [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Ying [1 ]
Pan, Hong [1 ]
Wang, Jingmin [3 ]
Qi, Yu [1 ]
Ma, Yinan [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Cent Lab, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Clin Lab, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Pediat, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
JOINT-CONSENSUS-RECOMMENDATION; INTERPRETATION GUIDELINES; MITOCHONDRIAL DISEASE; SEQUENCE VARIANTS; MUTATIONS; ASSOCIATION; GENOMICS;
D O I
10.1002/pd.6628
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has enhanced the diagnostic efficacy for monogenic diseases, while presenting challenges in achieving consistent diagnoses.MethodWe retrospectively analyzed the concordance rate and reasons for the inconsistency between the original diagnostic result from the genetic testing laboratory and the variant validation result from the prenatal diagnostic center. The validation procedure comprised three stages: validation of variant detection, reevaluation of variant classification, and assessment of recurrence risk, which involved verifying the mode of inheritance and parental carriage.ResultIn total, 17 (6%) of the 286 families affected by rare monogenic diseases showed different results during the variant validation procedure. These cases comprised four (23.5%) with variant detection errors, 12 (70.5%) with inconsistent interpretation, and one (6%) with non-Mendelian inheritance patterns. False-positive NGS results confirmed by Sanger sequencing were related to pseudogenes and GC-rich regions. The classification of the 17 variants was altered in the 12 cases owing to various factors. The case with an atypical inheritance pattern was originally considered autosomal recessive inheritance, but was diagnosed as maternal uniparental disomy after additional genetic analysis.ConclusionWe underscored the significance of variant validation by prenatal diagnostic centers. Families affected by monogenic diseases with reproductive plans should be referred to prenatal genetic centers as early as possible to avoid different results that may postpone subsequent prenatal diagnosis. What's already known about this topic?The inconsistency in variant interpretation among genetic testing laboratories or between clinicians and laboratories is non-neglectable.What does this study addThe study pinpointed three types of inconsistency between genetic testing laboratories and prenatal diagnostic laboratory, and underscored the importance of timely referral to prenatal genetic centers.
引用
收藏
页码:1053 / 1061
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluation of a new diagnostic service for rare monogenic diseases; 12 months experience
    Marchbank, N
    Wallace, AJ
    Elles, RG
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2004, 41 : S67 - S67
  • [22] Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases-bench to bedside reflections
    Dokras, Anuja
    Barlow, David
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2022, 118 (05) : 849 - 851
  • [23] IMPACT OF DISCREPANT VARIANT CLASSIFICATION ON PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC TESTING FOR MONOGENIC CONDITIONS (PGTM).
    Awwad, Rawan I.
    Besser, Andria G.
    Grifo, James A.
    Davis, Gina M.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2022, 118 (04) : E355 - E356
  • [24] The expanding diagnostic toolbox for rare genetic diseases
    Kernohan, Kristin D.
    Boycott, Kym M.
    NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2024, 25 (06) : 401 - 415
  • [25] The impact of preimplantation genetic testing on prenatal diagnostic procedures
    Gulersen, Moti
    Baum, Stephanie
    Bornstein, Eran
    Krantz, David
    Singer, Tomer
    Divon, Michael Y.
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (18): : 3066 - 3069
  • [26] Rare diseases: democratising genetic testing in LMICs
    Nunez-Samudio, Virginia
    Arcos-Burgos, Mauricio
    Landires, Ivan
    LANCET, 2023, 401 (10385): : 1339 - 1340
  • [27] Bottlenecks in molecular testing for rare genetic diseases
    Willems, Patrick J.
    HUMAN MUTATION, 2008, 29 (06) : 772 - 775
  • [28] Clinical Validation and Diagnostic Utility of Optical Genome Mapping in Prenatal Diagnostic Testing
    Sahajpal, Nikhil S.
    Mondal, Ashis K.
    Fee, Timothy
    Hilton, Benjamin
    Layman, Lawrence
    Hastie, Alex R.
    Chaubey, Alka
    DuPont, Barbara R.
    Kolhe, Ravindra
    JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 25 (04): : 234 - 246
  • [29] Role of aneuploidy screening in preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic diseases in young women
    Hou, Wenhui
    Xu, Yan
    Li, Rong
    Song, Junli
    Wang, Jing
    Zeng, Yanhong
    Pan, Jiafu
    Zhou, Canquan
    Xu, Yanwen
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2019, 111 (05) : 928 - 935
  • [30] Genetic analyses and counseling. Rare diseases in prenatal methane
    Moog, U.
    Dikow, N.
    Gaspar, H.
    Behnecke, A.
    Schenk, J. P.
    Flechtenmacher, C.
    Beedgen, B.
    Elsaesser, M.
    GYNAKOLOGE, 2012, 45 (05): : 376 - 382