Intelligent Intrusion Detection in Software-Defined Networking: A Comparative Study of SVM and ANN Models

被引:2
|
作者
Boukraa, Lamiae [1 ]
Essahraui, Siham [1 ]
El Makkaoui, Khalid [2 ]
Ouahbi, Ibrahim [2 ]
Esbai, Redouane [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mohammed Premier, Multidisciplinary Fac Nador, MASI Lab, Oujda, Morocco
[2] Univ Mohammed Premier, Multidisciplinary Fac Nador, Oujda, Morocco
关键词
Artificial neural Networks (ANN); Distributed denial-of-service (DDoS); Intrusion detection system (IDS); Software-defined networking (SDN); Support vector machines (SVM);
D O I
10.1016/j.procs.2023.09.007
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Software-defined networking (SDN) has emerged as a promising approach for managing network infrastructure through a centralized controller. However, the dynamic nature of SDN makes it susceptible to security threats, including DoS and DDoS attacks. Intrusion detection systems (IDS) based on machine learning (ML) can efficiently detect and mitigate these attacks. This study compares two ML models, namely support vector machines (SVM) and artificial neural networks (ANN), for intelligent intrusion detection in SDN. To assess the performance of the ML models, we utilized the NSL-KDD dataset, with a specific emphasis on DDoS attacks, and compared their accuracy (Acc), precision, recall, and F1-score metrics. The implementation outcomes show that SVM is better than ANN regarding response time and Acc. (c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:26 / 33
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A new attacks intrusion detection model based on deep learning in Software-Defined Networking Environments
    Yang, Jikun
    2024 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, MLISE 2024, 2024, : 430 - 436
  • [22] Evaluation of Deep Learning Models in ITS Software-Defined Intrusion Detection Systems
    Babbar, Himanshi
    Bouachir, Ouns
    Rani, Shalli
    Aloqaily, Moayad
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE/IFIP NETWORK OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT SYMPOSIUM 2022, 2022,
  • [23] An ecosystem for anomaly detection and mitigation in software-defined networking
    Carvalho, Luiz Fernando
    Abrao, Taufik
    Mendes, Leonardo de Souza
    Proenca, Mario Lemes, Jr.
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2018, 104 : 121 - 133
  • [24] Towards DDoS detection mechanisms in Software-Defined Networking
    Cui, Yunhe
    Qian, Qing
    Guo, Chun
    Shen, Guowei
    Tian, Youliang
    Xing, Huanlai
    Yan, Lianshan
    JOURNAL OF NETWORK AND COMPUTER APPLICATIONS, 2021, 190
  • [25] A Survey on Software-Defined Networking
    Xia, Wenfeng
    Wen, Yonggang
    Foh, Chuan Heng
    Niyato, Dusit
    Xie, Haiyong
    IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS AND TUTORIALS, 2015, 17 (01): : 27 - 51
  • [26] Software-Defined Networking: A survey
    Farhady, Hamid
    Lee, HyunYong
    Nakao, Akihiro
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2015, 81 : 79 - 95
  • [27] On Scalability of Software-Defined Networking
    Yeganeh, Soheil Hassas
    Tootoonchian, Amin
    Ganjali, Yashar
    IEEE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE, 2013, 51 (02) : 136 - 141
  • [28] Deep packet inspection for intelligent intrusion detection in software-defined industrial networks: A proof of concept
    Sainz, Markel
    Garitano, Inaki
    Iturbe, Mikel
    Zurutuza, Urko
    LOGIC JOURNAL OF THE IGPL, 2020, 28 (04) : 461 - 472
  • [29] Middlebox selection optimization via an intelligent framework in software-defined networking
    Zadkhosh, Ehsan
    Bahramgiri, Hossein
    Sabaei, Masoud
    TRANSACTIONS ON EMERGING TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 32 (04)
  • [30] SDNIPS: Enabling Software-Defined Networking Based Intrusion Prevention System in Clouds
    Xing, Tianyi
    Xiong, Zhengyang
    Huang, Dijiang
    Medhi, Deep
    2014 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NETWORK AND SERVICE MANAGEMENT (CNSM), 2014, : 308 - 311