Background: The complex medical terminology of radiology reports may cause confusion or anxiety for patients, especially given increased access to electronic health records. Large language models (LLMs) can potentially simplify radiology report readability. Purpose: To compare the performance of four publicly available LLMs (ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4, Bard [now known as Gemini], and Bing) in producing simplified radiology report impressions. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective comparative analysis of the four LLMs (accessed July 23 to July 26, 2023), the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database was used to gather 750 anonymized radiology report impressions covering a range of imaging modalities (MRI, CT, US, radiography, mammography) and anatomic regions. Three distinct prompts were employed to assess the LLMs' ability to simplify report impressions. The first prompt (prompt 1) was "Simplify this radiology report." The second prompt (prompt 2) was "I am a patient. Simplify this radiology report." The last prompt (prompt 3) was "Simplify this radiology report at the 7th grade level." Each prompt was followed by the radiology report impression and was queried once. The primary outcome was simplification as assessed by readability score. Readability was assessed using the average of four established readability indexes. The nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank test was applied to compare reading grade levels across LLM output. Results: All four LLMs simplified radiology report impressions across all prompts tested (P < .001). Within prompts, differences were found between LLMs. Providing the context of being a patient or requesting simplification at the seventh-grade level reduced the reading grade level of output for all models and prompts (except prompt 1 to prompt 2 for ChatGPT-4) (P < .001). Conclusion: Although the success of each LLM varied depending on the specific prompt wording, all four models simplified radiology report impressions across all modalities and prompts tested. (c) RSNA, 2024
机构:
Peking Univ, Dept Pathol, Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R ChinaPeking Univ, Dept Pathol, Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
Tao, LiLi
Chen, Yaoli
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Peking Univ, Dept Pathol, Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R ChinaPeking Univ, Dept Pathol, Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
Chen, Yaoli
Huang, Qitao
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Pathol, Canc Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R ChinaPeking Univ, Dept Pathol, Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
Huang, Qitao
Yong, Juanjuan
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Pathol, Sun Yat Sen Mem Hosp, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R ChinaPeking Univ, Dept Pathol, Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
Yong, Juanjuan
Yan, ShuMei
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Pathol, Canc Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R ChinaPeking Univ, Dept Pathol, Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
Yan, ShuMei
Huang, Yuhua
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Sun Yat Sen Univ, Dept Pathol, Canc Ctr, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
Collaborat Innovat Ctr Canc Med, State Key Lab Oncol South China, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R ChinaPeking Univ, Dept Pathol, Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Peoples R China