Green finance and high-pollution corporate compensation - Empirical evidence from green credit guidelines

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Shiyu [1 ]
Lin, Deqin [1 ]
Xiao, Hongfei [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Macau, Fac Finance, Taipa, Macao, Peoples R China
关键词
Green credit guidelines (GCG); Corporate compensation structure; Punishment effect; Incentive effect; Guidance effect; STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES; SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION; POLITICAL CONNECTIONS; INFORMATION DISCLOSURE; FIRM PERFORMANCE; CHINA; GOVERNANCE; INVESTMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27851
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
With the increasing focus on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on a global scale, stakeholders expect businesses to transform and enhance social responsibility. Over time, ESG and CSR have developed into vital performance metrics for businesses. Businesses are actively putting improvement measures into place in response to this new paradigm in order to stay competitive in this changing environment. China's dual commitment to CSR and sustainable development is in line with wider objectives, such as resolving issues of pay inequality. In 2012, the China Banking Regulatory Commission (CBRC) unveiled the "Green Credit Guidelines" (GCG), which take corporate governance's environmental considerations into account. These regulations set standards and specifically target high-pollution corporations. Companies may need to restructure their corporate structures and create efficient governance mechanisms in order to comply with these regulations and reduce carbon emissions. This will have an impact on the compensation packages of executives and regular employees. The most important question is how the "GCG" will affect the wage disparity in highly polluting companies. This study examines the 2012 "GCG" and its potential to reduce internal wage disparities, viewing it as a critical element of green financial policy. The paper uses data from Chinese A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2020. Besides, it uses the Difference-inDifferences method to assess the impact of China's GCG, treating its implementation as a quasi-natural experiment and controlling for concurrent policy effects to precisely identify its net impact on corporate carbon emissions and internal wage disparities. The findings show that "GCG" considerably closed internal wage disparities. Furthermore, the "GCG" has a path of guidance, incentives, and punishments that reduce internal wage disparities and promote a more equitable wage distribution within businesses. According to heterogeneity analysis, policies have a greater impact on the wage gap in businesses that are highly dependent on outside funding and have political connection. In order to achieve a compensation balance and meet the objectives of social responsibility and corporate sustainable development, the government should strengthen the complementary effects of green financial policies. The compensation balance in highly polluting companies has important theoretical and practical ramifications. On the one hand, it represents the convergence of income equality, corporate governance, and environmental responsibility. It helps to expand knowledge of sustainable development, fair compensation, and environmental policies. On the other hand, the widening pay disparity between executives and average employees reflects the exacerbation of income inequality in China, which could potentially impact companies' long-term development.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Green credit policy and corporate diversification: evidence from China
    Su, Dongwei
    Xu, Shulin
    Yang, Zhen
    [J]. POST-COMMUNIST ECONOMIES, 2023, 35 (03) : 315 - 349
  • [32] Green credit policy and corporate deleveraging: Evidence from China
    Li, Cong
    Wang, Yiming
    Sun, Weiguo
    Yu, Yue
    Ding, Yuzhen
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 66
  • [33] Green credit and corporate ESG performance: Evidence from China
    Gao, Wei
    Liu, Zebin
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 55
  • [34] Green finance pilot policy and corporate environmental social responsibility: empirical evidence from China’s green finance reform and innovation pilot zones
    Xie, Qianling
    [J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 (40) : 52784 - 52803
  • [35] Inhibit or stimulate? Green credit guidelines and corporate financialization
    Wang, Jun
    Huang, Huaxin
    Khan, Ali Nawaz
    Liao, Yinchao
    Zang, Dungang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 470
  • [36] Green credit and corporate energy efficiency: Enterprise pollution transfer or green transformation
    Li, Xiaosheng
    Wang, Ruirui
    Shen, Z. Y.
    Song, Malin
    [J]. ENERGY, 2023, 285
  • [37] Can green finance improve the ESG performance? Evidence from green credit policy in China
    Ma, Dan
    He, Yuhang
    Zeng, Linggang
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2024, 137
  • [38] Fostering green development with green finance: An empirical study on the environmental effect of green credit policy in China
    Zhang, Shengling
    Wu, Zihao
    Wang, Yao
    Hao, Yu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 296
  • [39] The role of green finance and energy innovation in neutralizing environmental pollution: Empirical evidence from the MINT economies
    Li, Cai
    Sampene, Agyemang Kwasi
    Agyeman, Fredrick Oteng
    Brenya, Robert
    Wiredu, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 317
  • [40] Enabling Green Innovation Quality through Green Finance Credit Allocation: Evidence from Chinese Firms
    Hao, Liangfeng
    Deng, Biyi
    Zhang, Haobo
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (17)