Contact algorithm of the material point method and comparison with the finite element method

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Peng [1 ]
Liu, Dong-huan [2 ]
Guo, Hu [1 ]
Xie, Ke [1 ]
Zhang, Qing-ping [1 ]
Deng, Zhi-fang [1 ]
机构
[1] China Acad Engn Phys, Inst Syst Engn, Mianyang 621900, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Sci & Technol Beijing, Sch Math & Phys, Beijing Key Lab Magneto Photoelect Composite & Int, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Material point method; Contact algorithm; Finite element method; Impact problems; IMPACT; PENETRATION; SIMULATION; STRESS; MPM;
D O I
10.1007/s10596-024-10302-0
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Being a fully Lagrangian particle method, the material point method (MPM) discretizes a material domain by using a collection of material points. The momentum equations in MPM are solved on a predefined regular background grid, so that the grid distortion and entanglement are completely avoided in MPM. The contact algorithm of MPM is developed via the background grid and the impenetrability condition between bodies. The contact algorithm of MPM is applied to solve some impact and perforation problems. This study concerns the validation of the contact algorithm of MPM. Solutions from MPM with the contact algorithm are compared to those from the finite element method (FEM) with the penalty method. For two impact problems, the results from MPM with the contact algorithm are in good agreement with those obtained with the FEM penalty method. For the perforation problem of aluminum plate, the results obtained using MPM with the contact algorithm are better than those from the FEM penalty method. We think that for impact problems without extreme large deformations, it is better to use the FEM penalty method. For impact problems with extreme large deformations, it is better to use the contact algorithm of MPM.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Algorithm study of gradual fracture of ductile metallic material with finite element method
    Yang Fengping
    Sun Qin
    [J]. ACTA METALLURGICA SINICA, 2008, 44 (04) : 489 - 494
  • [32] A Comparison of Applied Element Method and Finite Element Method for Elastostatic Problems
    Christy, D. Lincy
    Pillai, T. M. Madhavan
    Nagarajan, Praveen
    [J]. STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT, ICONS 2018, 2020, : 309 - 320
  • [33] NUMERICAL-SOLUTION OF POINT CONTACT PROBLEM USING FINITE-ELEMENT METHOD
    OH, KP
    ROHDE, SM
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 1977, 11 (10) : 1507 - 1518
  • [34] FINITE-ELEMENT METHOD - ACCURACY AT A POINT
    FRIED, I
    [J]. QUARTERLY OF APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 1974, 32 (02) : 149 - 161
  • [35] Discrete material forces in the Finite Element Method
    Mueller, R
    Gross, D
    [J]. Mechanics of Material Forces, 2005, 11 : 105 - 114
  • [36] On the use of material forces in the finite element method
    Balassas, KG
    Kalpakides, V
    Stavroulakis, GE
    [J]. CONFIGURATIONAL MECHANICS, 2004, : 157 - 166
  • [37] An adaptive finite element method for contact problems in finite elasticity
    Rachowicz, W.
    Cecot, W.
    Zdunek, A.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN MECHANICS: THEORETICAL, COMPUTATIONAL AND INTERDISCIPLINARY ISSUES, 2016, : 493 - 496
  • [38] An adaptive finite element material point method and its application in extreme deformation problems
    Lian, Y. P.
    Zhang, X.
    Liu, Y.
    [J]. COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2012, 241 : 275 - 285
  • [39] Hybrid staggered grid finite element material point method (HSGFEMP) for reinforced concrete
    Kan, Lei
    Sun, ZiXian
    Zhang, Xiong
    Zhou, Xu
    Cui, XiaoXiao
    [J]. SCIENTIA SINICA-PHYSICA MECHANICA & ASTRONOMICA, 2022, 52 (10)
  • [40] A coupled implicit material point-finite element method for modeling reinforced materials
    Chihadeh, Ahmad
    Kaliske, Michael
    [J]. ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS, 2022, 39 (07) : 2553 - 2580