Spontaneous and double-strand break repair-associated quasipalindrome and frameshift mutagenesis in budding yeast: role of mismatch repair

被引:0
|
作者
Sugawara, Neal [1 ,2 ]
Towne, Mason J. [1 ,2 ]
Lovett, Susan T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Haber, James E. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Brandeis Univ, Dept Biol, Waltham, MA 02454 USA
[2] Brandeis Univ, Rosenstiel Basic Med Sci Res Ctr MS029, Waltham, MA 02454 USA
[3] Brandeis Univ, Rosenstiel Ctr MS029, 415 South St, Waltham, MA 02454 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
budding yeast; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; gene conversion; DSB repair; mutagenesis; quasipalindrome; frameshift; DNA-POLYMERASE-DELTA; REPLICATION; MUTATIONS; INSIGHTS; REARRANGEMENTS; RECOMBINATION; EXONUCLEASE; SUBUNITS;
D O I
10.1093/genetics/iyae068
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Although gene conversion (GC) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is the most error-free way to repair double-strand breaks (DSBs), the mutation rate during homologous recombination is 1,000 times greater than during replication. Many mutations involve dissociating a partially copied strand from its repair template and re-aligning with the same or another template, leading to -1 frameshifts in homonucleotide runs, quasipalindrome (QP)-associated mutations and microhomology-mediated interchromosomal template switches. We studied GC induced by HO endonuclease cleavage at MAT alpha, repaired by an HMR::KI-URA3 donor. We inserted into HMR::KI-URA3 an 18-bp inverted repeat where one arm had a 4-bp insertion. Most GCs yield MAT::KI-ura3::QP + 4 (Ura-) outcomes, but template-switching produces Ura+ colonies, losing the 4-bp insertion. If the QP arm without the insertion is first encountered by repair DNA polymerase and is then (mis)used as a template, the palindrome is perfected. When the QP + 4 arm is encountered first, Ura+ derivatives only occur after second-end capture and second-strand synthesis. QP + 4 mutations are suppressed by mismatch repair (MMR) proteins Msh2, Msh3, and Mlh1, but not Msh6. Deleting Rdh54 significantly reduces QP mutations only when events creating Ura+ occur in the context of a D-loop but not during second-strand synthesis. A similar bias is found with a proofreading-defective DNA polymerase mutation (poI3-01). DSB-induced mutations differed in several genetic requirements from spontaneous events. We also created a + 1 frameshift in the donor, expanding a run of 4 Cs to 5 Cs. Again, Ura+ recombinants markedly increased by disabling MMR, suggesting that MMR acts during GC but favors the unbroken, template strand.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Nucleosome remodelers in double-strand break repair
    Seeber, Andrew
    Hauer, Michael
    Gasser, Susan M.
    CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 23 (02) : 174 - 184
  • [22] DksA and DNA double-strand break repair
    Kamila K. Myka
    Max E. Gottesman
    Current Genetics, 2019, 65 : 1297 - 1300
  • [23] Ubiquitylation in DNA double-strand break repair
    Tang, Mengfan
    Li, Siting
    Chen, Junjie
    DNA REPAIR, 2021, 103
  • [24] Double-strand break repair in human cells
    West, SC
    Chapell, C
    Hanakahi, LA
    Masson, JY
    McIlwraith, MJ
    Van Dyck, E
    COLD SPRING HARBOR SYMPOSIA ON QUANTITATIVE BIOLOGY, 2000, 65 : 315 - 321
  • [25] Double-Strand DNA Break Repair in Mycobacteria
    Glickman, Michael S.
    MICROBIOLOGY SPECTRUM, 2014, 2 (05):
  • [26] Mechanisms of DNA double-strand break repair
    Symington, Lorraine S.
    Deng, Sarah K.
    YEAST, 2015, 32 : S31 - S31
  • [27] EFFECT OF EGFR ON DOUBLE-STRAND BREAK REPAIR
    Dikomey, E.
    Kriegs, M.
    Kasten-Pisula, U.
    Rieckmann, T.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2012, 102 : S130 - S130
  • [28] DNA Repair: A RIDDLE at a Double-Strand Break
    Hiom, Kevin
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (08) : R331 - R333
  • [29] Drosophila ATR in double-strand break repair
    LaRocque, Jeannine R.
    Jaklevic, Burnley
    Su, Tin Tin
    Sekelsky, Jeff
    GENETICS, 2007, 175 (03) : 1023 - 1033
  • [30] Molecular genetic analysis of DNA double-strand break repair in yeast saccharomycetes
    Glaser, VM
    Glasunov, AV
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF GENETICS, 1999, 35 (11) : 1245 - 1263