What are the barriers towards cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women? A qualitative comparative analysis of stakeholder perspectives in seven European countries

被引:0
|
作者
Boje, Rikke Buus [1 ]
Bardou, Marc [2 ]
Mensah, Keitly [3 ]
Berrocal, Raquel Rico [4 ]
Rossi, Paolo Giorgi [5 ]
Bonvicini, Laura [5 ]
Auzzi, Noemi [6 ]
Taut, Diana [7 ]
Jiboc, Nicoleta [7 ]
Tisler, Anna [8 ]
Reintamm, Kerli [8 ]
Uuskula, Anneli [9 ]
Teixeira, Margarida [10 ]
Firmino-Machado, Joao [10 ]
Amorim, Mariana [10 ]
Baia, Ines [10 ]
Lunet, Nuno [10 ]
Michaylova, Raya [11 ]
Panayotova, Yulia [11 ]
Kotzeva, Tatyana [11 ]
Andersen, Berit [1 ,12 ]
Kirkegaard, Pia [1 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Res Clin Canc Screening, Randers Reg Hosp, Randers, Denmark
[2] Inst Natl Sante & Rech med, CIC P INSERM 1432, Paris, France
[3] IARC, Prevent & Infect Branch, Early Detect, Lyon, France
[4] Ecole Hautes Etud Sci Sociales, Ctr Etud Mouvements Sociaux, Paris, France
[5] Azienda USL IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Serv Epidemiol, Reggio Emilia, Italy
[6] Osservatorio Nazl Screening, Ist Studio Prevenz & Rete Oncolog, Florence, Italy
[7] Babes Bolyai Univ, Cluj Napoca, Romania
[8] Univ Tartu, Inst Family Med & Publ Hlth, Tartu, Estonia
[9] Univ Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
[10] Univ Porto, Inst Publ Hlth, EPI Unit, Porto, Portugal
[11] Hlth Psychol Res Ctr, Sofia, Bulgaria
[12] Aarhus Univ, Dept Clin Med, Aarhus, Denmark
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 05期
关键词
Gynaecological oncology; Health Equity; Health Services Accessibility; PREVENTIVE MEDICINE; PUBLIC HEALTH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; ATTENDANCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives The aim of this study was to map and compare stakeholders' perceptions of barriers towards cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women in seven European countries.Design In Collaborative User Boards, stakeholders were invited to participate to identify barriers towards participation in cervical cancer screening.Setting The study is nested in the European Union-funded project CBIG-SCREEN which aims to tackle inequity in cervical cancer screening for vulnerable women (www.cbig-screen.eu). Data collection took place in Bulgaria, Denmark, Estonia, France, Italy, Portugal and Romania.Participants Participants represented micro-level stakeholders covering representatives of users, that is, vulnerable women, meso-level stakeholders covering healthcare professionals and social workers, and macro-level stakeholders covering programme managers and decision-makers.Methods Across the seven countries, 25 meetings in Collaborative User Boards with a duration of 2 hours took place between October 2021 and June 2022. The meetings were video recorded or audio recorded, transcribed and translated into English for a qualitative framework analysis.Results 120 participants took part in the Collaborative User Boards. Context-specific barriers were related to different healthcare systems and characteristics of vulnerable populations. In Romania and Bulgaria, the lack of a continuous screening effort and lack of ways to identify eligible women were identified as barriers for all women rather than being specific for women in vulnerable situations. The participants in Denmark, Estonia, France, Italy and Portugal identified providers' lack of cultural and social sensitivity towards vulnerable women as barriers. In all countries, vulnerable women's fear, shame and lack of priority to preventive healthcare were identified as psychological barriers.Conclusion The study provides an overview of stakeholders' perceived barriers towards vulnerable women's cervical cancer screening participation in seven European countries. The organisation of healthcare systems and the maturity of screening programmes differ between countries, while vulnerable women's psychological barriers had several similarities.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Breast and cervical cancer screening for women with physical disabilities: A qualitative study of experiences and barriers
    Kilic, Ayse
    Tastan, Sevinc
    Guvenc, Gulten
    Akyuz, Aygul
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2019, 75 (09) : 1976 - 1986
  • [22] Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening uptake among women in Nepal - a qualitative study
    Andersen, Johanne Greibe
    Shrestha, Aamod Dhoj
    Gyawali, Bishal
    Neupane, Dinesh
    Kallestrup, Per
    WOMEN & HEALTH, 2020, 60 (09) : 963 - 974
  • [23] Barriers to cervical cancer screening among rural women in eastern China: a qualitative study
    Yang, Huan
    Li, Shun-Ping
    Chen, Qing
    Morgan, Christopher
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (03):
  • [24] Barriers and facilitators for mHealth utilization in pregnancy care: a qualitative analysis of pregnant women and stakeholder's perspectives
    Asadollahi, Fateme
    Zagami, Samira Ebrahimzadeh
    Eslami, Saeid
    Roudsari, Robab Latifnejad
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [25] Women's perception of barriers and facilitators of cervical cancer Pap smear screening: a qualitative study
    Shariati-Sarcheshme, Mansoore
    Mahdizdeh, Mehrsadat
    Tehrani, Hadi
    Jamali, Jamshid
    Vahedian-Shahroodi, Mohammad
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [26] Perceived barriers to cervical cancer screening among refugee women after resettlement: A qualitative study
    Parajuli, Jamuna
    Horey, Dell
    Avgoulas, Maria-Irini
    CONTEMPORARY NURSE, 2020, 56 (04) : 363 - 375
  • [27] Family Caregivers' Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators of Cervical and Breast Cancer Screening for Women with Intellectual Disability
    Swaine, Jamie G.
    Dababnah, Sarah
    Parish, Susan L.
    Luken, Karen
    INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2013, 51 (01) : 62 - 73
  • [28] Health Care Providers' Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to Cervical Cancer Screening in Vietnamese American Women
    Nguyen-Truong, Connie Kim Yen
    Hassouneh, Dena
    Lee-Lin, Frances
    Hsiao, Chiao-Yun
    Tuong Vy Le
    Tang, Joannie
    Vu, Margret
    Truong, Anthony My
    JOURNAL OF TRANSCULTURAL NURSING, 2018, 29 (05) : 441 - 448
  • [29] A soft systems approach to identifying barriers to cancer screening programmes. Methodology and application in seven European countries
    Priaulx, J.
    Turnbull, E.
    Van Ravesteyn, N. T.
    Heinavaara, S.
    Senore, C.
    Voko, Z.
    Jarm, K.
    Veerus, P.
    De Koning, H.
    McKee, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 28 : 267 - 268
  • [30] Identifying the barriers to effective breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in thirty one European countries using the Barriers to Effective Screening Tool (BEST)
    Priaulx, Jennifer
    de Koning, Harry J.
    de Kok, Inge M. C. M.
    Szeles, Gyorgy
    McKee, Martin
    HEALTH POLICY, 2018, 122 (11) : 1190 - 1197