A comparative study on the combination of life cycle assessment and ecological footprints: solar photovoltaic power generation vs. coal power generation in Ningxia

被引:0
|
作者
Luo, Jinni [1 ]
Yang, Hexu [1 ]
Zhang, Liangxia [1 ]
Liu, He [2 ]
Wang, Yidan [1 ]
Hao, Chen [1 ]
机构
[1] Ningxia Inst Sci & Technol, Shizuishan, Peoples R China
[2] Ningxia Belite Chem Cyanamide Dev Co Ltd, Shizuishan, Peoples R China
关键词
solar photovoltaic power generation; greenhouse gas emissions; ecological footprint; life cycle assessment; carbon mitigation; CHINA; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.3389/fenrg.2024.1375820
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In China, where energy activities, predominantly driven by fossil fuel combustion, account for nearly 90% of the country's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and coal power alone contributes over 40%, the shift towards carbon neutrality is a critical national ambition. This study conducts a comprehensive comparison of the environmental impacts of solar photovoltaic power generation (SPPG) and coal power, employing both life cycle assessment and ecological footprint analysis. We meticulously analyze the complete lifecycle of SPPG, pinpointing key stages of GHG emissions, and offer nuanced, localized policy recommendations. Our findings indicate that a 1 kWp SPPG module emits 1,601.18 kg of GHGs over its lifespan, equating to 1.35 kg/kW<middle dot>h per unit of electricity produced-substantially lower than the 4.81 kg/kW<middle dot>h emitted by coal power, thus highlighting the latter's heightened environmental detriment. Additionally, this study assesses the ecological footprint of both energy sources in Ningxia. SPPG emerges with an ecological surplus, showcasing a per capita footprint of 0.0342 hm2, compatible with Ningxia's ecological capacity. In stark contrast, coal power exhibits a sustained ecological deficit over the past 5 years, with a growing per capita footprint of 0.6529 hm2, underscoring its unsustainability. This research provides a detailed comparative analysis of the environmental impacts of SPPG and coal power in Ningxia, offering valuable insights for energy policymakers and industry stakeholders. It underscores the urgent need for industrial restructuring towards more sustainable and renewable energy sources, aligning with China's broader objectives of environmental preservation and achieving carbon neutrality.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Life-cycle-based water footprint assessment of coal-fired power generation in China
    Zhu, Yongnan
    Jiang, Shan
    Zhao, Yong
    Li, Haihong
    He, Guohua
    Li, Lei
    [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 254
  • [32] Comparing Chinese Clean Coal Power Generation Technologies with Life Cycle Inventory
    Xiao Bin
    Suo Chenxia
    Yan Xiaofei
    [J]. 2010 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (ICEED2010), 2011, 5 : 2195 - 2200
  • [33] Life Cycle Inventory of Clean Coal-Fired Power Generation in China
    Xiao, Bin
    Suo, Chenxia
    Yan, Xiaofei
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND BUSINESS MANAGEMENT (EBM2011), VOLS 1-6, 2011, : 3014 - 3017
  • [34] Comparative assessment of methanol and ammonia: Green fuels vs. hydrogen carriers in fuel cell power generation
    Sanchez, Antonio
    Blanco, Elena C.
    Martin, Mariano
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 374
  • [35] Evaluating combination models of solar irradiance on inclined surfaces and forecasting photovoltaic power generation
    Cui, Chenggang
    Zou, Yuhang
    Wei, Liaoliao
    Wang, Yadong
    [J]. IET SMART GRID, 2019, 2 (01) : 123 - 130
  • [36] Is small or big solar better for the environment? Comparative life cycle assessment of solar photovoltaic rooftop vs. ground-mounted systems
    Riya Roy
    Joshua M. Pearce
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2024, 29 : 516 - 536
  • [37] Is small or big solar better for the environment? Comparative life cycle assessment of solar photovoltaic rooftop vs. ground-mounted systems
    Roy, Riya
    Pearce, Joshua M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2024, 29 (03): : 516 - 536
  • [38] Life cycle assessment of geothermal power generation technologies: An updated review
    Tomasini-Montenegro, C.
    Santoyo-Castelazo, E.
    Gujba, H.
    Romero, R. J.
    Santoyo, E.
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 114 : 1119 - 1136
  • [39] Life cycle assessment of ammonia utilization in city transportation and power generation
    Bicer, Yusuf
    Dincer, Ibrahim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 170 : 1594 - 1601
  • [40] A Comparative Study on Methods used in Life Cycle Assessment of Coal-Fired Power Plant
    Das, U.
    Nandi, C.
    De, D.
    Das, S.
    Nandi, S. S.
    [J]. THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 71 (07) : 617 - 630