Implementation of shared decision-making about rooming-in: A before and after an audit of breastfeeding in Taiwan

被引:1
|
作者
Hung, Hsiao-Ying [1 ,2 ]
Wen, Chun-Che [3 ]
Su, Pei-Fang [4 ]
Man, Shek-Yip [2 ]
Chang, Ying-Ju [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Coll Med, Dept Nursing, Tainan, Taiwan
[2] Natl Cheng Kung Univ Hosp, Dept Nursing, Tainan, Taiwan
[3] Med Univ South Carolina, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Charleston, SC USA
[4] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Stat, Tainan, Taiwan
[5] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Inst Allied Hlth Sci, Coll Med, Tainan, Taiwan
来源
INTERNATIONAL BREASTFEEDING JOURNAL | 2024年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
Shared decision-making; Prenatal intention; Rooming-in; Breastfeeding; Maternal autonomy; POSTPARTUM; MOTHER; CARE; NEWBORN; HEALTH; BIRTH; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1186/s13006-024-00649-6
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background The 24-h rooming-in policy is crucial to the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) for promoting breastfeeding. However, this policy may restrict maternal autonomy. In 2018, to integrate women's preferences into care decisions, Taiwan's Baby-Friendly certification included prenatal shared decision-making (SDM) for rooming-in. Prior to 2018, maternal knowledge, considerations, and intentions regarding rooming-in and the impact of prenatal SDM were unknown. Methods A retrospective electronic medical record cohort study was conducted in southern Taiwan. Data on healthy postpartum women eligible for rooming-in and breastfeeding for the years 2017 and 2019, reflecting the periods before and after prenatal SDM was introduced, were gathered. Maternal and newborn characteristics, maternal knowledge, considerations, and prenatal intentions for postpartum rooming-in and breastfeeding during hospitalization were collected. Additionally, data on actual postpartum rooming-in practices during hospitalization and exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) practices from birth to hospital discharge, to 1 month, and to 2 months postpartum were collected. Descriptive and non-parametric statistics were applied to analyze the data. Results A total of 621 women in 2017 and 311 women in 2019 were included. After prenatal SDM was introduced, the rooming-in rate during hospitalization fell from 42.2% in 2017 to 25.6% in 2019 (p < 0.001), and the EBF rate declined from 45.9% to 35.7% (p = 0.01). Additionally, the 1-month postpartum EBF rate decreased from 46.4% in 2017 (n = 571) to 44.3% in 2019 (n = 264), and the 2-month postpartum EBF rate dropped from 45.5% in 2017 (n = 591) to 40.2% (n = 308). According to the 2019 Patient Decision Aids responses (n = 236), women demonstrated limited understanding of rooming-in, with only 40.7% expressing an intention toward 24-h rooming-in. Women of older maternal age (p < 0.001), with a graduate degree (p = 0.02), full-time employment (p = 0.04), and concerns about rest disruption (p < 0.001), were more likely to prefer non-24-h rooming-in. Conclusions Initiatives must promote prenatal SDM to enable healthcare providers to address misconceptions and tailor education, thereby increasing women's intention toward 24-h rooming-in and EBF. Future research should explore women's experiences and unmet needs at BFHI facilities to inform the construction of a baby- and mother-friendly environment.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implementation of Shared Decision-Making in Australia
    Ervin, K.
    Blackberry, I.
    Haines, H.
    ASIA PACIFIC JOURNAL OF HEALTH MANAGEMENT, 2016, 11 (02): : 10 - 11
  • [2] The Impact of Shared Decision-Making on the Quality of Decision Making in Aortic Dissection: A before-and-after Comparison Study
    Zhang, Duo
    Zheng, Haoyang
    Zheng, Zhi
    Pan, Youmin
    Zha, Zhengbiao
    Liu, Juan
    Zhu, Lisi
    Wu, Qiansheng
    Hu, Kaili
    Chen, Zelin
    Wang, Xiaoxiao
    Nampoukime, Kan-Paatib Barnabo
    Zhou, Yanrong
    REVIEWS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 24 (08)
  • [3] Shared decision-making and the implementation of treatment recommendations for depression
    Crawford, Joanna
    Petrie, Katherine
    Harvey, Samuel B.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2021, 104 (08) : 2119 - 2121
  • [4] The Hospital-Wide Implementation of Shared Decision-Making
    Geiger, Friedemann
    Novelli, Anna
    Berg, Daniela
    Hacke, Claudia
    Sundmacher, Leonie
    Kopeleva, Olga
    Scheibler, Fueloep
    Rueffer, Jens-Ulrich
    Kuch, Christine
    Wehkamp, Kai
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 118 (13): : 225 - 226
  • [5] Gaps in the Implementation of Shared Decision-making: Illustrative Cases
    Weiss, Elliott Mark
    Clark, Jonna D.
    Heike, Carrie L.
    Rosenberg, Abby R.
    Shah, Seema K.
    Wilfond, Benjamin S.
    Opel, Douglas J.
    PEDIATRICS, 2019, 143 (03)
  • [6] Implementation of Shared Decision-Making in Clinical Practice in Rheumatology
    Ezequiel Borgia, R.
    Salloum, Ramzi G.
    JCR-JOURNAL OF CLINICAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 26 : S98 - S100
  • [7] Shared decision-making in hypertension: results of implementation in Germany
    Deinzer, A.
    Babel, H.
    Veelken, R.
    Kohnen, R.
    Schmieder, R. E.
    DEUTSCHE MEDIZINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2006, 131 (46) : 2592 - 2596
  • [8] Some disproven misconceptions about shared decision-making
    MacDonald, Blair J.
    Turgeon, Ricky D.
    CANADIAN PHARMACISTS JOURNAL, 2024, 157 (01) : 10 - 12
  • [10] Shared decision-making before prostate cancer screening decisions
    Pekala, Kelly R.
    Shill, Daniela K.
    Austria, Mia
    Langford, Aisha T.
    Loeb, Stacy
    Carlsson, Sigrid V.
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2024, 21 (06) : 329 - 338