Revolutionizing Developmental Neurotoxicity Testing - A Journey from Animal Models to Advanced In Vitro Systems

被引:1
|
作者
Smirnova, Lena [1 ,2 ]
Hogberg, Helena T. [3 ]
Leist, Marcel [4 ,5 ]
Hartung, Thomas [1 ,2 ,4 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Ctr Alternat Anim Testing CAAT, Whiting Sch Engn, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] NIEHS, DTT, NICEATM, NIH, Durham, NC USA
[4] Univ Konstanz, CAAT Europe, Constance, Germany
[5] Univ Konstanz, Doerenkamp Zbinden Fdn, Vitro Toxicol & Biomed, Constance, Germany
[6] Doerenkamp Zbinden Chair Evidence Based Toxicol, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Ctr Alternat Anim Testing CAAT, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
ADVERSE OUTCOME PATHWAYS; STAKEHOLDER NETWORK ISTNET; ALTERNATIVE METHODS; CULTURE PRACTICE; RISK-ASSESSMENT; STEM-CELLS; BRAIN; DNT; TOXICITY; AUTISM;
D O I
10.14573/altex.2403281
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing has seen enormous progress over the last two decades. Preceding even the publication of the animal -based OECD test guideline for DNT testing in 2007, a series of non -animal technology workshops and conferences that started in 2005 has shaped a community that has delivered a comprehensive battery of in vitro test methods (DNT IVB). Its data interpretation is now covered by a very recent OECD guidance (No. 377). Here, we overview the progress in the field, focusing on the evolution of testing strategies, the role of emerging technologies, and the impact of OECD test guidelines on DNT testing. In particular, this is an example of the targeted development of an animal -free testing approach for one of the most complex hazards of chemicals to human health. These developments started literally from a blank slate, with no proposed alternative methods available. Over two decades, cutting -edge science enabled the design of a testing approach that spares animals and enables throughput to address this challenging hazard. While it is evident that the field needs guidance and regulation, the massive economic impact of decreased human cognitive capacity caused by chemical exposure should be prioritized more highly. Beyond this, the claim to fame of DNT in vitro testing is the enormous scientific progress it has brought for understanding the human brain, its development, and how it can be perturbed. Plain language summary Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing predicts the hazard of exposure to chemicals to human brain development. Comprehensive advanced non -animal testing strategies using cutting -edge technology can now replace animal -based approaches to assess this complex hazard. These strategies can assess large numbers of chemicals more accurately and efficiently than the animal -based approach. Recent OECD test guidance has formalized this battery of in vitro test methods for DNT, marking a pivotal achievement in the field. The shift towards non -animal testing reflects both a commitment to animal welfare and a growing recognition of the economic and public health impacts associated with impaired cognitive function caused by chemical exposures. These innovations ultimately contribute to safer chemical management and better protection of human health, especially during the vulnerable stages of brain development.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 178
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] In vitro neurotoxicity testing: lessons from chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity
    Tarasiuk, Olga
    Invernizzi, Chiara
    Alberti, Paola
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG METABOLISM & TOXICOLOGY, 2024,
  • [22] Testing for developmental neurotoxicity using a battery of in vitro assays for key cellular events in neurodevelopment
    Harrill, Joshua A.
    Freudenrich, Theresa
    Wallace, Kathleen
    Ball, Kenneth
    Shafer, Timothy J.
    Mundy, William R.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY AND APPLIED PHARMACOLOGY, 2018, 354 : 24 - 39
  • [23] Evaluation of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) In Vitro Toxicity Testing for Developmental Neurotoxicity
    Carstens, Kelly E.
    Freudenrich, Theresa
    Wallace, Kathleen
    Choo, Seline
    Carpenter, Amy
    Smeltz, Marci
    Clifton, Matthew S.
    Henderson, W. Matthew
    Richard, Ann M.
    Patlewicz, Grace
    Wetmore, Barbara A.
    Friedman, Katie Paul
    Shafer, Timothy
    [J]. CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY, 2023, 36 (03) : 402 - 419
  • [24] Human Neurospheres as Three-Dimensional Cellular Systems for Developmental Neurotoxicity Testing
    Moors, Michaela
    Rockel, Thomas Dino
    Abel, Josef
    Cline, Jason E.
    Gassmann, Kathrin
    Schreiber, Timm
    Schuwald, Janette
    Weinmann, Nicole
    Fritsche, Ellen
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2009, 117 (07) : 1131 - 1138
  • [25] Human neurospheres as three-dimensional cellular systems for developmental neurotoxicity testing
    Fritsche, E.
    Gassmann, K.
    Rockel, T.
    Schreiber, T.
    Schuwald, J.
    Krutmann, J.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2010, 196 : S22 - S23
  • [26] Human neurospheres as 3D cellular systems for developmental neurotoxicity testing
    Fritsche, Ellen
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2012, 211 : S31 - S31
  • [27] Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma:: lessons from in vitro model systems and animal models
    Meurs, H.
    Gosens, R.
    Zaagsma, J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2008, 32 (02) : 487 - 502
  • [28] Refining in vitro neurotoxicity testing -: The development of blood-brain barrier models
    Tähti, H
    Nevala, H
    Toimela, T
    [J]. ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2003, 31 (03): : 273 - 276
  • [29] Challenges of using animal and in vitro models to understand human developmental toxicology
    van Duursen, M.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2022, 368 : S39 - S39
  • [30] In vitro models to reduce animal testing for REACH registration of chemicals
    Klausner, Mitchell
    Kubilus, Joseph
    Ayehunie, Seyoum
    Hayden, Patrick
    Kandarova, Helena
    Sheasgreen, John
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2007, 172 : S83 - S84