Revolutionizing Developmental Neurotoxicity Testing - A Journey from Animal Models to Advanced In Vitro Systems

被引:1
|
作者
Smirnova, Lena [1 ,2 ]
Hogberg, Helena T. [3 ]
Leist, Marcel [4 ,5 ]
Hartung, Thomas [1 ,2 ,4 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Ctr Alternat Anim Testing CAAT, Whiting Sch Engn, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] NIEHS, DTT, NICEATM, NIH, Durham, NC USA
[4] Univ Konstanz, CAAT Europe, Constance, Germany
[5] Univ Konstanz, Doerenkamp Zbinden Fdn, Vitro Toxicol & Biomed, Constance, Germany
[6] Doerenkamp Zbinden Chair Evidence Based Toxicol, Baltimore, MD USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Ctr Alternat Anim Testing CAAT, 615 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
关键词
ADVERSE OUTCOME PATHWAYS; STAKEHOLDER NETWORK ISTNET; ALTERNATIVE METHODS; CULTURE PRACTICE; RISK-ASSESSMENT; STEM-CELLS; BRAIN; DNT; TOXICITY; AUTISM;
D O I
10.14573/altex.2403281
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing has seen enormous progress over the last two decades. Preceding even the publication of the animal -based OECD test guideline for DNT testing in 2007, a series of non -animal technology workshops and conferences that started in 2005 has shaped a community that has delivered a comprehensive battery of in vitro test methods (DNT IVB). Its data interpretation is now covered by a very recent OECD guidance (No. 377). Here, we overview the progress in the field, focusing on the evolution of testing strategies, the role of emerging technologies, and the impact of OECD test guidelines on DNT testing. In particular, this is an example of the targeted development of an animal -free testing approach for one of the most complex hazards of chemicals to human health. These developments started literally from a blank slate, with no proposed alternative methods available. Over two decades, cutting -edge science enabled the design of a testing approach that spares animals and enables throughput to address this challenging hazard. While it is evident that the field needs guidance and regulation, the massive economic impact of decreased human cognitive capacity caused by chemical exposure should be prioritized more highly. Beyond this, the claim to fame of DNT in vitro testing is the enormous scientific progress it has brought for understanding the human brain, its development, and how it can be perturbed. Plain language summary Developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing predicts the hazard of exposure to chemicals to human brain development. Comprehensive advanced non -animal testing strategies using cutting -edge technology can now replace animal -based approaches to assess this complex hazard. These strategies can assess large numbers of chemicals more accurately and efficiently than the animal -based approach. Recent OECD test guidance has formalized this battery of in vitro test methods for DNT, marking a pivotal achievement in the field. The shift towards non -animal testing reflects both a commitment to animal welfare and a growing recognition of the economic and public health impacts associated with impaired cognitive function caused by chemical exposures. These innovations ultimately contribute to safer chemical management and better protection of human health, especially during the vulnerable stages of brain development.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 178
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In vitro developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing: Relevant models and endpoints
    Bal-Price, Anna K.
    Hogberg, Helena T.
    Buzanska, Leonora
    Lenas, Petros
    van Vliet, Erwin
    Hartung, Thomas
    [J]. NEUROTOXICOLOGY, 2010, 31 (05) : 545 - 554
  • [2] ReproTracker as an In Vitro Alternative to Animal Models for Developmental Toxicity Testing
    Hartvelt, S.
    Flatt, L.
    Zwetsloot, T.
    Feliksik, M.
    Hendriks, G.
    Jamalpoor, A.
    [J]. BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH, 2023, 115 (08): : 848 - 848
  • [3] Developmental neurotoxicity testing in vitro:: Models for assessing chemical effects on neurite outgrowth
    Radio, Nicholas M.
    Mundy, William R.
    [J]. NEUROTOXICOLOGY, 2008, 29 (03) : 361 - 376
  • [4] Establishment of in vitro assays for regulatory developmental neurotoxicity testing
    Bartmann, K.
    Masjosthusmann, S.
    Stuerzl, L. -C.
    Waldmann, T.
    Leist, M.
    Fritsche, E.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 314 : S221 - S221
  • [5] In vitro developmental neurotoxicity testing models using hiPSC-derived neural stem cells
    Yi, H.
    Seo, J. -H.
    Park, Y. -I.
    Song, J. -Y.
    Kang, H. -G.
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2015, 238 (02) : S322 - S323
  • [6] Application of in vitro alternative methods for developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) testing: Relevant models and endpoints emerging from new technologies
    Price, Anna
    Buzanska, Leonora
    Hogberg, Helena
    van Vliet, Erwin
    Morath, Siegfried
    Sobanski, Tomasz
    Coecke, Sandra
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2008, 180 : S28 - S28
  • [7] Zebrafish as a systems toxicology model for developmental neurotoxicity testing
    Nishimura, Yuhei
    Murakami, Soichiro
    Ashikawa, Yoshifumi
    Sasagawa, Shota
    Umemoto, Noriko
    Shimada, Yasuhito
    Tanaka, Toshio
    [J]. CONGENITAL ANOMALIES, 2015, 55 (01) : 1 - 16
  • [8] In vitro and other alternative approaches to developmental neurotoxicity testing (DNT)
    Lein, P
    Silbergeld, E
    Locke, P
    Goldberg, AM
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 19 (03) : 735 - 744
  • [9] In vitro developmental neurotoxicity testing using micro electrode arrays
    Price, Anna
    Sobanski, Tomasz
    Novellino, Antonio
    Hogberg, Helena
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2012, 211 : S33 - S33
  • [10] Stem cell based assay for in vitro developmental neurotoxicity testing
    DeGroot, Didima
    Schulpen, Sjors
    VanBurgsteden, Johan
    Hondenbrink, Laura
    Freidig, Andreas
    Lammers, Jan
    Wolterbeek, Andre
    Seiler, Andrea
    Vijverberg, Henk
    Westerink, Remco
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2007, 172 : S184 - S184