Prediction of sepsis mortality in ICU patients using machine learning methods

被引:0
|
作者
Gao, Jiayi [1 ]
Lu, Yuying [1 ]
Ashrafi, Negin [1 ]
Domingo, Ian [2 ]
Alaei, Kamiar [3 ]
Pishgar, Maryam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Dept Ind Syst Engn, 3715 McClintock Ave, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Informat & Comp Sci, Inner Ring Rd, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[3] Calif State Univ Long Beach, Dept Hlth Sci, 1250 Bellflower Blvd,HHS2-117, Long Beach, CA 90840 USA
关键词
Sepsis; Random Forest; Machine learning; MIMIC-IV; ICU mortality;
D O I
10.1186/s12911-024-02630-z
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
ProblemSepsis, a life-threatening condition, accounts for the deaths of millions of people worldwide. Accurate prediction of sepsis outcomes is crucial for effective treatment and management. Previous studies have utilized machine learning for prognosis, but have limitations in feature sets and model interpretability.AimThis study aims to develop a machine learning model that enhances prediction accuracy for sepsis outcomes using a reduced set of features, thereby addressing the limitations of previous studies and enhancing model interpretability.MethodsThis study analyzes intensive care patient outcomes using the MIMIC-IV database, focusing on adult sepsis cases. Employing the latest data extraction tools, such as Google BigQuery, and following stringent selection criteria, we selected 38 features in this study. This selection is also informed by a comprehensive literature review and clinical expertise. Data preprocessing included handling missing values, regrouping categorical variables, and using the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) to balance the data. We evaluated several machine learning models: Decision Trees, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, LightGBM, Multilayer Perceptrons (MLP), Support Vector Machines (SVM), and Random Forest. The Sequential Halving and Classification (SHAC) algorithm was used for hyperparameter tuning, and both train-test split and cross-validation methodologies were employed for performance and computational efficiency.ResultsThe Random Forest model was the most effective, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.94 with a confidence interval of +/- 0.01. This significantly outperformed other models and set a new benchmark in the literature. The model also provided detailed insights into the importance of various clinical features, with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and average urine output being highly predictive. SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) analysis further enhanced the model's interpretability, offering a clearer understanding of feature impacts.ConclusionThis study demonstrates significant improvements in predicting sepsis outcomes using a Random Forest model, supported by advanced machine learning techniques and thorough data preprocessing. Our approach provided detailed insights into the key clinical features impacting sepsis mortality, making the model both highly accurate and interpretable. By enhancing the model's practical utility in clinical settings, we offer a valuable tool for healthcare professionals to make data-driven decisions, ultimately aiming to minimize sepsis-induced fatalities.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Identification of Risk Factors and Prediction of Sepsis in Pregnancy Using Machine Learning Methods
    Kopanitsa, Georgy
    Metsker, Oleg
    Paskoshev, David
    Greschischeva, Sofia
    [J]. 10TH INTERNATIONAL YOUNG SCIENTISTS CONFERENCE IN COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE (YSC2021), 2021, 193 : 393 - 401
  • [32] Machine Learning Approaches-Driven for Mortality Prediction for Patients Undergoing Craniotomy in ICU
    Yu, Ronguo
    Wang, Shaobo
    Xu, Jingqing
    Wang, Qiqi
    He, Xinjun
    Li, Jun
    Shang, Xiuling
    Chen, Han
    Liu, Youjun
    [J]. BRAIN INJURY, 2021, 35 (14) : 1658 - 1664
  • [33] Early Prediction of Sepsis using Machine Learning
    Shankar, Anuraag
    Diwan, Mufaddal
    Singh, Snigdha
    Nahrpurawala, Husain
    Bhowmick, Tanusri
    [J]. 2021 11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CLOUD COMPUTING, DATA SCIENCE & ENGINEERING (CONFLUENCE 2021), 2021, : 837 - 842
  • [34] A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis
    van Doorn, William P. T. M.
    Stassen, Patricia M.
    Borggreve, Hella F.
    Schalkwijk, Maaike J.
    Stoffers, Judith
    Bekers, Otto
    Meex, Steven J. R.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (01):
  • [35] Prediction of All-cause Mortality with Sepsis-associated Encephalopathy in the ICU Based on Interpretable Machine Learning
    Lu, Xiao
    Zhu, Jiang
    Gui, Jiahui
    Li, Qin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2022 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHATRONICS AND AUTOMATION (IEEE ICMA 2022), 2022, : 298 - 302
  • [36] Machine Learning Methods to Address Confounding in Sepsis Mortality Rate
    Basu, T.
    Teng, D.
    Bhomia, N.
    O'Malley, M.
    McLaughlin, E.
    Munroe, E.
    Bozyk, P. D.
    Blamoun, J.
    Kocher, K.
    Horowitz, J.
    Posa, P.
    Flanders, S.
    Prescott, H. C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 207
  • [37] On classifying sepsis heterogeneity in the ICU: insight using machine learning
    Ibrahim, Zina M.
    Wu, Honghan
    Hamoud, Ahmed
    Stappen, Lukas
    Dobson, Richard J. B.
    Agarossi, Andrea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 27 (03) : 437 - 443
  • [38] Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of 28-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy: development and validation
    Zhou, Shu
    Lu, Zongqing
    Liu, Yu
    Wang, Minjie
    Zhou, Wuming
    Cui, Xuanxuan
    Zhang, Jin
    Xiao, Wenyan
    Hua, Tianfeng
    Zhu, Huaqing
    Yang, Min
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [39] Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of 28-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy: development and validation
    Shu Zhou
    Zongqing Lu
    Yu Liu
    Minjie Wang
    Wuming Zhou
    Xuanxuan Cui
    Jin Zhang
    Wenyan Xiao
    Tianfeng Hua
    Huaqing Zhu
    Min Yang
    [J]. European Journal of Medical Research, 29