Aortic valve replacement with rapid-deployment bioprosthesis in case of infective endocarditis: a literature review

被引:0
|
作者
Piperata, Antonio [1 ]
Azmoun, Alexandre [1 ]
Eker, Armand [1 ]
机构
[1] Cardiothorac Ctr Monaco, 11 Bis Ave Ostende, MC-98000 Monaco, Monaco
关键词
Aortic valve; Infective endocarditis; Cardiac surgery; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; PATIENTS AGED 50; CONVENTIONAL TREATMENT; ROOT REPLACEMENT; OLMSTED COUNTY; EARLY SURGERY; OUTCOMES; TRENDS; MANAGEMENT; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s12055-024-01736-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
PurposeRecently, the use of rapid deployment (RD) aortic valve prostheses has been introduced for the treatment of aortic valve replacement (AVR), showing excellent hemodynamic performances.According to these data, some groups have proposed new RD valves as an alternative solution in the case of infective aortic endocarditis (IAE) to reduce the use of foreign materials, and the manipulation of the annulus.The aim of this review is to report the results of early clinical experiences with the use of RD bioprostheses in the case of IAE, in order to discuss technical and clinical aspects of this emerging strategy to better elucidate its advantages and limitations as a potential therapeutic solution.PurposeRecently, the use of rapid deployment (RD) aortic valve prostheses has been introduced for the treatment of aortic valve replacement (AVR), showing excellent hemodynamic performances.According to these data, some groups have proposed new RD valves as an alternative solution in the case of infective aortic endocarditis (IAE) to reduce the use of foreign materials, and the manipulation of the annulus.The aim of this review is to report the results of early clinical experiences with the use of RD bioprostheses in the case of IAE, in order to discuss technical and clinical aspects of this emerging strategy to better elucidate its advantages and limitations as a potential therapeutic solution.PurposeRecently, the use of rapid deployment (RD) aortic valve prostheses has been introduced for the treatment of aortic valve replacement (AVR), showing excellent hemodynamic performances.According to these data, some groups have proposed new RD valves as an alternative solution in the case of infective aortic endocarditis (IAE) to reduce the use of foreign materials, and the manipulation of the annulus.The aim of this review is to report the results of early clinical experiences with the use of RD bioprostheses in the case of IAE, in order to discuss technical and clinical aspects of this emerging strategy to better elucidate its advantages and limitations as a potential therapeutic solution.MethodsAn in-depth search of PubMed from January to March 2023 was performed. English-language articles were selected independently by authors following the criteria in order to consider all available experiences (full papers, case reports, and case series) that have investigated the use of RD in case of IAE.ResultsThe use of rapid deployment bioprosthesis represents a bailout strategy in case of severe aortic valve endocarditis and should be evaluated with caution in selected cases. This review collects the first, initial, and pioneering experiences of the use of the RD prosthesis in case of infective endocarditis, particularly when the fragility of the annular tissues precludes a secure anchoring of sutured prostheses.The reduced use of foreign materials by minimizing the number of stitches, the reduced cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp times, and the excellent hemodynamic performances associated with the use of RD bioprosthesis represent the most important advantages that could justify their use in the setting of aortic valve endocarditis.ResultsThe use of rapid deployment bioprosthesis represents a bailout strategy in case of severe aortic valve endocarditis and should be evaluated with caution in selected cases. This review collects the first, initial, and pioneering experiences of the use of the RD prosthesis in case of infective endocarditis, particularly when the fragility of the annular tissues precludes a secure anchoring of sutured prostheses.The reduced use of foreign materials by minimizing the number of stitches, the reduced cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp times, and the excellent hemodynamic performances associated with the use of RD bioprosthesis represent the most important advantages that could justify their use in the setting of aortic valve endocarditis.ConclusionAlthough there are few anecdotal experiences, surgical aortic valve replacement with the use of RD represents an emerging strategy in case of aortic valve endocarditis. Its advantages, pros, and cons are under debate, and robust clinical trials are needed to demonstrate its safety and efficacy.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 99
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of conventional and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement on the distance from the aortic annulus to coronary arteries
    Coti, Iuliana
    Maierhofer, Udo
    Rath, Claus
    Werner, Paul
    Loewe, Christian
    Kocher, Alfred
    Laufer, Guenther
    Andreas, Martin
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2021, 32 (02) : 196 - 203
  • [32] Determination of risk factors for pacemaker requirement following rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement
    Rahmanian, Parwis B.
    Eghbalzadeh, Kaveh
    Kaya, Suereyya
    Menghesha, Hruy
    Gerfer, Stephen
    Liakopoulos, Oliver J.
    Choi, Yeong-Hong
    Wahlers, Thorsten
    INTERACTIVE CARDIOVASCULAR AND THORACIC SURGERY, 2018, 27 (02) : 215 - 221
  • [33] The use of sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve prosthesis in patients with bicuspid aortic valve: A focused review
    King, Morgan
    Stambulic, Thomas
    Payne, Darrin
    Luis Fernandez, Angel
    El-Diasty, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC SURGERY, 2022, 37 (10) : 3355 - 3362
  • [34] Surgical aortic valve replacement and infective endocarditis
    Malmberg, Markus
    Ahtela, Elina
    Sipila, Jussi O. T.
    Gunn, Jarmo
    Rautava, Paivi
    Kyto, Ville
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2021, 51 (06)
  • [35] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Valve Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Call for Action
    Brankovic, Milos
    Hashemi, Ashkan
    Ansari, Julia
    Sharma, Abhishek
    CARDIOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2023, 12 (02) : 297 - 306
  • [36] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Valve Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Call for Action
    Milos Brankovic
    Ashkan Hashemi
    Julia Ansari
    Abhishek Sharma
    Cardiology and Therapy, 2023, 12 : 297 - 306
  • [37] Surgery for Infective Endocarditis with Aortic Valve Damage in Children: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Song, Yanyan
    Zhang, Bin
    Liu, Xudong
    JOURNAL OF INFLAMMATION RESEARCH, 2024, 17 : 5471 - 5474
  • [38] Early-Term Results of Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement versus Standard Bioprosthesis Implantation Combined with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
    Taghiyev, Zulfugar T.
    Bechtel, Matthias
    Schloemicher, Markus
    Useini, Dritan
    Taghi, Hamid Naraghi
    Moustafine, Vadim
    Strauch, Justus T.
    THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2023, 71 (07): : 519 - 527
  • [39] Commentary: Missing a beat? Implications of heart block with rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement Comment
    Yuh, David D.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 162 (03): : 812 - 813
  • [40] Pacemaker implantation after aortic valve replacement: rapid-deployment Intuity® compared to conventional bioprostheses
    Herry, Morgane
    Laghlam, Driss
    Touboul, Olivier
    Nguyen, Lee S.
    Estagnasie, Philippe
    Brusset, Alain
    Squara, Pierre
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 58 (02) : 335 - 342