Harnessing the Drivers and Barriers to Implementation of Extended Producer Responsibility for Circular Economy in Nigeria

被引:0
|
作者
Ezeudu O.B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Centre for Environmental Management and Control, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu
[2] Industrial Ecology Program, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, V8W 2Y2, BC
来源
关键词
Circular economy; End-of-life products; Environmental policy; Industrial ecology; Waste management;
D O I
10.1007/s43615-023-00340-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Extended producer responsibility (EPR) is increasingly being recognized across the globe as a veritable scheme to realize the circular economy. This is because it has the potential to close the material cycles and foster effective waste management through the ‘polluter pay principle’ that allows the producers to internalize the cost of the environmental externalities of their products. Notwithstanding these realities, research on the drivers and barriers to the implementation of EPR at the macro-level circular economy in developing countries is still lacking, particularly in Africa where studies are few and primarily focus on single end-of-life (Eol) product analysis. Contributing to this gap in knowledge, the current study analyzes four Eol product cases in Nigeria — waste of electronic and electrical equipment (WEEE), plastic waste, glass bottle waste, and tyre waste — in an empirical investigation that involves an iterative process of case comparison and perspectives elicited from focus group discussions. The study findings identify major drivers of EPR implementation in Nigeria which include the emergence of social initiatives that participate in waste collection and recycling (4 cases), the pre-existing returnable glass bottle process (1 case), the organized value chain of informal waste recycling (4 cases), and already established producer responsibility organizations (3 cases). The main barriers include the absence of waste and economic data (4 cases), the absence of proper channels for waste collection and segregation (4 cases), the ineffective legislature (4 cases), unavailable producers (3 cases), and the availability of small and medium enterprises that lack the financial capacity to implement the EPR program (3 cases). The study suggests integrating informal waste recyclers into the EPR program and implementing a deposit refund system (DRS). Furthermore, it is argued that the best EPR for a developing nation like Nigeria, where additional revenue may be obtained from grants and consumer taxes, is the collective producer responsibility (CPR). © 2024, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
引用
收藏
页码:1461 / 1486
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Extended producer responsibility’s effect on producers’ electronic waste management practices in Japan and Canada: drivers, barriers, and potential of the urban mine
    Mika Kaibara Portugaise
    Lára Jóhannsdóttir
    Shinsuke Murakami
    [J]. Discover Sustainability, 4
  • [32] Risk based management of chemicals and products in a circular economy at a global scale (risk cycle), extended producer responsibility and EU legislation
    Lahl U.
    Zeschmar-Lahl B.
    [J]. Environmental Sciences Europe, 2013, 25 (01)
  • [33] Drivers and Barriers for a Circular Economy (CE) Implementation in Poland-A Case Study of Raw Materials Recovery Sector
    Smol, Marzena
    Marcinek, Paulina
    Koda, Eugeniusz
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (08)
  • [34] Promoting the implementation of extended producer responsibility systems in China: A behavioral game perspective
    Shan, Haiyan
    Yang, Junliang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 250
  • [35] Extended producer responsibility for consumer waste: the gap between economic theory and implementation
    Dubois, Maarten
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2012, 30 (09) : 36 - 42
  • [36] Drivers and outcomes of circular economy implementation: evidence from China
    Li, Yina
    Hu, Yuzhou
    Li, Lixu
    Zheng, Jiayan
    Yin, Ying
    Fu, Shaoling
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT & DATA SYSTEMS, 2023, 123 (04) : 1178 - 1197
  • [37] Enablers and barriers to implementation of circular economy in solid waste valorization: The case of urban markets in Anambra, Southeast Nigeria
    Ezeudu, Obiora B.
    Ezeudu, Tochukwu S.
    Ugochukwu, Uzochukwu C.
    Agunwamba, Jonah C.
    Oraelosi, Tochukwu C.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS, 2021, 12
  • [38] Barriers and Drivers for Circular Economy 2.0 on the Firm Level: Russian Case
    Ratner, Svetlana
    Gomonov, Konstantin
    Lazanyuk, Inna
    Revinova, Svetlana
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (19)
  • [39] Circular economy in Latin America and the Caribbean: Drivers, opportunities, barriers and strategies
    Gallego-Schmid, Alejandro
    López-Eccher, Camila
    Muñoz, Edmundo
    Salvador, Rodrigo
    Cano-Londoño, Natalia A.
    Barros, Murillo Vetroni
    Bernal, Daniel Choconta
    Mendoza, Joan Manuel F.
    Nadal, Ana
    Guerrero, Ana Belén
    [J]. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2024, 51 : 118 - 136
  • [40] Mapping the path to sustainable accounting: a DEMATEL-based analysis of key factors influencing effective extended producer responsibility in the circular economy
    Sahu, Manabhanjan
    Jee, Kishan
    Uddin, Furquan
    Sani, Alamgir
    Tiwari, Satish Chandra
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE, 2024,