Equity and gender mainstreaming in public policy: A scoping review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Amri, Michelle [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Jinny [4 ]
Jessiman-Perreault, Genevieve [3 ]
Haikal, Amne [5 ]
Barrett, Kathryn [6 ]
Bump, Jesse B. [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Harbour Ctr, Sch Publ Policy, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Harvard Univ, Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Takemi Program Int Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Fac Arts, Dawson Hall, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Sch Publ Policy, Calgary, AB, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto Scarborough Lib, Scarborough, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Bergen, Bergen Ctr Ethics & Prior Setting, Bergen, Norway
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0299124
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Despite growing attention paid to health equity and efforts to promote gender mainstreaming-a global strategy to promote gender equality-how policymakers have 'institutionalized' this in their work is less clear. Therefore, this planned scoping review seeks to search the peer-reviewed and grey literature to compile evidence on the ways in which policymakers have routinely or systematically considered equity and/or gender in their work.Methods A scoping review will be undertaken by drawing on the PRISMA guidelines for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). With the expert guidance of a research librarian, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, PAIS Index, and Scopus databases will be searched, in addition to custom Google searches of government documents. The search will be conducted from 1995 and onwards, as there were no hits prior to this date that included the term "gender mainstream*" in these databases. The inclusion criterion is that: (i) texts must provide information on how equity and/or gender has been considered by government officials in the development of public policy in a routine or systematic manner (e.g., descriptive, empirical); (ii) both texts produced by government or not (e.g., commentary about government action) will be included; (iii) there are no restrictions on study design or article type (i.e., commentaries, reports, and other documents, would all be included); and (iv) texts must be published in English due to resource constraints. However, texts that discuss the work of nongovernmental or intergovernmental organizations will be excluded. Data will be charted by: bibliographic information, including the authors, year, and article title; country the text discussed; and a brief summary on the approach taken.Discussion This protocol was developed to improve rigour in the study design and to promote transparency by sharing our methods with the broader research community. This protocol will support a scoping review of the ways in which policymakers have routinely or systematically considered equity and/or gender in their work. We will generate findings to inform government efforts to initiate, sustain, and improve gender and equity mainstreaming approaches in policymaking.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Gender Mainstreaming and Employment in the European Union: A Review and Analysis of Theoretical and Policy Literatures
    Rittenhofer, Iris
    Gatrell, Caroline
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2012, 14 (02) : 201 - 216
  • [33] Reckoning With Race and Gender in Public Administration and Public Policy: A Substantive Social Equity Turn
    Pandey, Sanjay K.
    Newcomer, Kathryn
    DeHart-Davis, Leisha
    Johnson, Jasmine McGinnis
    Riccucci, Norma M.
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2022, 82 (03) : 386 - 395
  • [34] Gender mainstreaming and EU climate change policy
    Allwood, Gill
    [J]. EUROPEAN INTEGRATION ONLINE PAPERS-EIOP, 2014, 18
  • [35] Public Transport Accessibility for People With Disabilities: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Mwaka, Claudel R.
    Best, Krista L.
    Gamache, Stephanie
    Gagnon, Martine
    Routhier, Francois
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [36] Public health approaches to substance use: a scoping review protocol
    Kosteniuk, Brynn
    Speed, Kelsey
    Candler, Ethan
    Campbell, Sandy
    Penney, Greg
    Moen, Karin
    Hyshka, Elaine
    [J]. JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (09) : 2395 - 2407
  • [37] A protocol for a scoping review of equity measurement in mental health care for children and youth
    William Gardner
    Stuart G. Nicholls
    Graham J. Reid
    Brian Hutton
    Candyce Hamel
    Lindsey Sikora
    Mina Salamatmanesh
    Laura Duncan
    Katholiki Georgiades
    Jason Gilliland
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [38] Health Equity in Artificial Intelligence and Primary Care Research: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Wang, Jonathan Xin
    Somani, Sulaiman
    Chen, Jonathan H.
    Murray, Sara
    Sarkar, Urmimala
    [J]. JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2021, 10 (09):
  • [39] A protocol for a scoping review of equity measurement in mental health care for children and youth
    Gardner, William
    Nicholls, Stuart G.
    Reid, Graham J.
    Hutton, Brian
    Hamel, Candyce
    Sikora, Lindsey
    Salamatmanesh, Mina
    Duncan, Laura
    Georgiades, Katholiki
    Gilliland, Jason
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2020, 9 (01)
  • [40] Genomics-informed nursing strategies and health equity: A scoping review protocol
    Dordunoo, Dzifa
    Limoges, Jacqueline
    Chiu, Patrick
    Puddester, Rebecca
    Carlsson, Lindsay
    Pike, April
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (12):