Equity and gender mainstreaming in public policy: A scoping review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Amri, Michelle [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yang, Jinny [4 ]
Jessiman-Perreault, Genevieve [3 ]
Haikal, Amne [5 ]
Barrett, Kathryn [6 ]
Bump, Jesse B. [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Harbour Ctr, Sch Publ Policy, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] Harvard Univ, Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Takemi Program Int Hlth, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Fac Arts, Dawson Hall, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Calgary, Sch Publ Policy, Calgary, AB, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto Scarborough Lib, Scarborough, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Bergen, Bergen Ctr Ethics & Prior Setting, Bergen, Norway
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0299124
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Despite growing attention paid to health equity and efforts to promote gender mainstreaming-a global strategy to promote gender equality-how policymakers have 'institutionalized' this in their work is less clear. Therefore, this planned scoping review seeks to search the peer-reviewed and grey literature to compile evidence on the ways in which policymakers have routinely or systematically considered equity and/or gender in their work.Methods A scoping review will be undertaken by drawing on the PRISMA guidelines for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). With the expert guidance of a research librarian, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, PAIS Index, and Scopus databases will be searched, in addition to custom Google searches of government documents. The search will be conducted from 1995 and onwards, as there were no hits prior to this date that included the term "gender mainstream*" in these databases. The inclusion criterion is that: (i) texts must provide information on how equity and/or gender has been considered by government officials in the development of public policy in a routine or systematic manner (e.g., descriptive, empirical); (ii) both texts produced by government or not (e.g., commentary about government action) will be included; (iii) there are no restrictions on study design or article type (i.e., commentaries, reports, and other documents, would all be included); and (iv) texts must be published in English due to resource constraints. However, texts that discuss the work of nongovernmental or intergovernmental organizations will be excluded. Data will be charted by: bibliographic information, including the authors, year, and article title; country the text discussed; and a brief summary on the approach taken.Discussion This protocol was developed to improve rigour in the study design and to promote transparency by sharing our methods with the broader research community. This protocol will support a scoping review of the ways in which policymakers have routinely or systematically considered equity and/or gender in their work. We will generate findings to inform government efforts to initiate, sustain, and improve gender and equity mainstreaming approaches in policymaking.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Mainstreaming Gender in European Public Policy: Bibliography
    Fiona Beveridge
    Jo Shaw
    [J]. Feminist Legal Studies, 2002, 10 (3-4) : 313 - 328
  • [3] Introduction: Mainstreaming Gender in European Public Policy
    Fiona Beveridge
    Jo Shaw
    [J]. Feminist Legal Studies, 2002, 10 (3-4) : 209 - 212
  • [4] Mainstreaming Gender in Karachi's Public Transport Policy
    Panjwani, Neha
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 7 (01): : 355 - 364
  • [5] Mainstreaming gender into healthcare: A scoping exercise into policy transfer in England and Germany
    Kuhlmann, Ellen
    Annandale, Ellen
    [J]. CURRENT SOCIOLOGY, 2012, 60 (04) : 551 - 568
  • [6] Interventions on gender equity in the workplace: a scoping review
    Andrea C. Tricco
    Amanda Parker
    Paul A. Khan
    Vera Nincic
    Reid Robson
    Heather MacDonald
    Rachel Warren
    Olga Cleary
    Elaine Zibrowski
    Nancy Baxter
    Karen E. A. Burns
    Doug Coyle
    Ruth Ndjaboue
    Jocalyn P. Clark
    Etienne V. Langlois
    Sofia B. Ahmed
    Holly O. Witteman
    Ian D. Graham
    Wafa El-Adhami
    Becky Skidmore
    France Légaré
    Janet Curran
    Gillian Hawker
    Jennifer Watt
    Ivy Lynn Bourgeault
    Jeanna Parsons Leigh
    Karen Lawford
    Alice Aiken
    Christopher McCabe
    Sasha Shepperd
    Reena Pattani
    Natalie Leon
    Jamie Lundine
    Évèhouénou Lionel Adisso
    Santa Ono
    Linda Rabeneck
    Sharon E. Straus
    [J]. BMC Medicine, 22
  • [7] Interventions on gender equity in the workplace: a scoping review
    Tricco, Andrea C.
    Parker, Amanda
    Khan, Paul A.
    Nincic, Vera
    Robson, Reid
    Macdonald, Heather
    Warren, Rachel
    Cleary, Olga
    Zibrowski, Elaine
    Baxter, Nancy
    Burns, Karen E. A.
    Coyle, Doug
    Ndjaboue, Ruth
    Clark, Jocalyn P.
    Langlois, Etienne V.
    Ahmed, Sofia B.
    Witteman, Holly O.
    Graham, Ian D.
    El-Adhami, Wafa
    Skidmore, Becky
    Legare, France
    Curran, Janet
    Hawker, Gillian
    Watt, Jennifer
    Bourgeault, Ivy Lynn
    Leigh, Jeanna Parsons
    Lawford, Karen
    Aiken, Alice
    Mccabe, Christopher
    Shepperd, Sasha
    Pattani, Reena
    Leon, Natalie
    Lundine, Jamie
    Adisso, Evehouenou Lionel
    Ono, Santa
    Rabeneck, Linda
    Straus, Sharon E.
    [J]. BMC MEDICINE, 2024, 22 (01)
  • [8] Gender Equity in Disability Sport: A Rapid Scoping Review
    Culver, Diane M.
    Shaikh, Majidullah
    Alexander, Danielle
    Fournier, Karine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL SPORT PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 16 (04) : 383 - 405
  • [9] Public Policy Diffusion: A Scoping Review
    Hassan Danaeefard
    Fatemeh Mahdizadeh
    [J]. Public Organization Review, 2022, 22 : 455 - 477
  • [10] Public Policy Diffusion: A Scoping Review
    Danaeefard, Hassan
    Mahdizadeh, Fatemeh
    [J]. PUBLIC ORGANIZATION REVIEW, 2022, 22 (02) : 455 - 477