Life Cycle Assessment as a Decision-Making Tool for Photochemical Treatment of Iprodione Fungicide from Wastewater

被引:1
|
作者
Dogan, Kubra [1 ]
Turkmen, Burcin Atilgan [2 ]
Arslan-Alaton, Idil [1 ]
Germirli Babuna, Fatos [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Civil Engn Fac, Environm Engn Dept, TR-34469 Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Bilecik Seyh Edebali Univ, Engn Fac, Chem Engn Dept, TR-11230 Bilecik, Turkiye
关键词
environmental impacts; life cycle assessment (LCA); advanced oxidation processes (AOPs); photochemical treatment of micropollutants; fungicide; iprodione; tertiary treated urban wastewater; ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESSES; DEGRADATION; REMOVAL; UV/H2O2; FENTON; ACID; UV;
D O I
10.3390/w16081183
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Water contamination with various micropollutants is a serious environmental concern since this group of chemicals cannot always be removed efficiently with advanced treatment methods. Therefore, alternative chemical- and energy-intensive oxidation processes have been proposed for the removal of refractory and/or toxic chemicals. However, similar treatment performances might result in different environmental impacts. Environmental impacts can be determined by adopting a life cycle assessment methodology. In this context, lab-scale experimental data related to 100% iprodione (a hydantoin fungicide/nematicide selected as the model micropollutant at a concentration of 2 mg/L) removal from simulated tertiary treated urban wastewater (dissolved organic carbon content = 10 mg/L) with UV-C-activated persulfate treatment were studied in terms of environmental impacts generated during photochemical treatment through the application of a life cycle assessment procedure. Standard guidelines were followed in this procedure. Iprodione removal was achieved at varying persulfate concentrations and UV-C doses; however, an "optimum" treatment condition (0.03 mM persulfate, 0.5 W/L UV-C) was experimentally established for kinetically acceptable, 100% iprodione removal in distilled water and adopted to treat iprodione in simulated tertiary treated wastewater (total dissolved organic carbon of iprodione + tertiary wastewater = 11.2 mg/L). The study findings indicated that energy input was the major contributor to all the environmental impact categories, namely global warming, abiotic depletion (fossil and elements), acidification, eutrophication, freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity, human toxicity, ozone depletion, photochemical ozone creation, and terrestrial ecotoxicity potentials. According to the life cycle assessment results, a concentration of 21.42 mg/L persulfate and an electrical energy input of 1.787 kWh/m3 (Wh/L) UV-C light yielded the lowest undesired environmental impacts among the examined photochemical treatment conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Knowledge Graph Framework to Support Life Cycle Assessment for Sustainable Decision-Making
    Greif, Lucas
    Hauck, Svenja
    Kimmig, Andreas
    Ovtcharova, Jivka
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [22] Technology assessment for wastewater treatment using multiple-attribute decision-making
    Kalbar, Pradip P.
    Karmakar, Subhankar
    Asolekar, Shyam R.
    TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2012, 34 (04) : 295 - 302
  • [23] Life cycle cost estimation tool for decision-making in the early phases of the design process
    Dimache, Aurora
    Dimache, Laurentiu
    Zoldi, Elena
    Roche, Thomas
    ADVANCES IN LIFE CYCLE ENGINEERING FOR SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING BUSINESSES, 2007, : 455 - +
  • [24] Life cycle assessment as development and decision support tool for wastewater resource recovery technology
    Fang, Linda L.
    Valverde-Perez, Borja
    Damgaard, Anders
    Plosz, Benedek Gy.
    Rygaard, Martin
    WATER RESEARCH, 2016, 88 : 538 - 549
  • [25] A COMPUTATIONAL DECISION-MAKING TOOL BASED ON LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS FOR REDUCED AIR EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS
    Stamou, I. -G. A.
    Konovessis, D.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2013,
  • [26] Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA), A Decision-Making Approach in Waste Water Treatment Plant: A Case Study
    Kushwah, Anand
    Kumar, Vikas
    Sundryal, Sanjay
    Paswan, Kamlesh
    Kumar, Ajay
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 11 (03): : 69 - 78
  • [27] SPIDERplan: A tool to support decision-making in radiation therapy treatment plan assessment
    Ventura, Tiago
    Lopes, Maria do Carmo
    Ferreira, Brigida Costa
    Khouri, Leila
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2016, 21 (06) : 508 - 516
  • [28] Quality of life assessment and clinical decision-making
    Casali, P
    Licitra, L
    Costantini, M
    Santoro, A
    Viterbori, P
    Bajetta, E
    Bruzzi, P
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1997, 8 (12) : 1207 - 1211
  • [29] Decision-making for the efficient life cycle management of structures
    Zimmert, Florian
    Braml, Thomas
    Keuser, Manfred
    STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, 2020, 21 (04) : 1217 - 1226
  • [30] QUALITY-OF-LIFE - A TOOL FOR DECISION-MAKING IN THE ICU
    MATA, GV
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1994, 20 (04) : 251 - 252