Evaluation of educational resource utilization efficiency, regional technological heterogeneity, and total factor productivity change in 35 European countries

被引:1
|
作者
Liao, Huayue [1 ]
Hao, Gang [2 ]
Yasmeen, Rizwana [3 ]
Shah, Wasi Ul Hassan [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Shuren Univ, Sch Management, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Management Sci, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[3] Panzhihua Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Panzhihua, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Relig & Denominat, Dept Econ, Qom, Iran
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0295979
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Educational resource utilization efficiency (ERUE) and productivity growth are considered current global challenges that the modern world faces. This study evaluates the educational resource utilization efficiency, dynamic productivity change, and regional discrepancies in technologies involved in educational resource utilization in 35 European countries and four regions. DEA Super SBM, Meta frontier analysis, and Malmquist productivity index are employed to gauge the ERUE, technology gap ratio (TGR), and total factor education resources productivity change. A set of inputs and outputs is used from 35 European countries for the study period of 1998-2021. Results revealed that the average ERUE in European countries is 0.6312, Which indicates a 36.88% improvement potential in educational resource utilization. Southern Europe continuously exhibits superior average ERUE scores (0.6871) compared to other regions, indicating a higher efficiency in using educational resources. Luxembourg (1.0813), Czechia (0.9356), and Slovenia (0.8984) are found to be the top three performers in terms of ERUE level. The technology gap ratio value is highest in Southern Europe. It demonstrates that southern European countries used the most advanced technology in education resource utilization. The average Malmquist Index (MI) in European countries is 1.0349. It Indicates a 3.49% growth in educational resource utilization. Technology is the primary determinant of productivity growth, as Technological change is higher than efficiency change. Southern European countries showed the highest MI of 1.0542. Italy, Lithuania, and Serbia were found to have higher average MI scores over the study period (1998-2021). Finally, the Kruskal Wallis test proved that ERUE and TGR in 4 different regions of Europe are heterogeneous. In contrast, the MI in European regions isn't found to be significantly different.
引用
收藏
页数:29
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Forestry Resource Efficiency, Total Factor Productivity Change, and Regional Technological Heterogeneity in China
    Shah, Wasi Ul Hassan
    Hao, Gang
    Yan, Hong
    Shen, Jintao
    Yasmeen, Rizwana
    [J]. FORESTS, 2024, 15 (01):
  • [2] Efficiency evaluation, regional technological heterogeneity and determinant of total factor productivity change in China's healthcare system
    Xu, Xiaowei
    Yasmeen, Rizwana
    Shah, Wasi Ul Hassan
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [3] Total factor productivity, efficiency, and technological change in the European regions: a nonparametric approach
    Ezcurra, Roberto
    Iraizoz, Belen
    Pascual, Pedro
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2009, 41 (05): : 1152 - 1170
  • [4] Firm heterogeneity, biased technological change, and total factor productivity: Evidence from China
    Qizheng Gao
    Jianqing Zhang
    Guo Chen
    [J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2023, 60 : 147 - 177
  • [5] Firm heterogeneity, biased technological change, and total factor productivity: Evidence from China
    Gao, Qizheng
    Zhang, Jianqing
    Chen, Guo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 2023, 60 (2) : 147 - 177
  • [6] Productivity, efficiency and technological change in European Union regional manufacturing: A data envelopment analysis approach
    Angeriz, A
    McCombie, J
    Roberts, M
    [J]. MANCHESTER SCHOOL, 2006, 74 (04): : 500 - 525
  • [7] Financial resources utilization efficiency in sports infrastructure development, determinant of total factor productivity growth and regional production technology heterogeneity in China
    Xu, Xiaowei
    Huang, Chen
    Shah, Wasi Ul Hassan
    [J]. HELIYON, 2024, 10 (05)
  • [8] Evaluation of total factor productivity and environmental efficiency of agriculture in nine East Asian countries
    Truc Linh Le
    Lee, Pai-Po
    Peng, Ke Chung
    Chung, Rebecca H.
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-ZEMEDELSKA EKONOMIKA, 2019, 65 (06): : 249 - 258
  • [9] The effects of biased technological change on total factor productivity: empirical evidence from a sample of OECD countries
    Cristiano Antonelli
    Francesco Quatraro
    [J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2010, 35 : 361 - 383
  • [10] The effects of biased technological change on total factor productivity: empirical evidence from a sample of OECD countries
    Antonelli, Cristiano
    Quatraro, Francesco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2010, 35 (04): : 361 - 383