Financial resources utilization efficiency in sports infrastructure development, determinant of total factor productivity growth and regional production technology heterogeneity in China

被引:1
|
作者
Xu, Xiaowei [1 ]
Huang, Chen [2 ]
Shah, Wasi Ul Hassan [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Shuren Univ, Phys Aesthet & Lab Educ Ctr, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Shuren Univ, Sch Management, Hangzhou 310015, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Relig & Denominat, Dept Econ, Qom, Iran
关键词
FRUE; DEA-SBM; Technology gap ratio; Sports infrastructure; TFPC; SLACKS-BASED MEASURE; ENVELOPMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26546
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Despite China's heavy investment in sports infrastructure development in the last decades, the financial resources utilization efficiency (FRUE), regional technological gap (TGR), and total factor productivity change (TFPC) in sports infrastructure development are undiscovered and worth investigating. To this end, this study employed DEA-SBM, Meta-frontier analysis, and Malmquist productivity index on the data set of 31 Chinese provinces and 3 regions for the years 2014-2021 to gauge the FRUE, TGR, and TFPC in sports infrastructure development. The results indicate that the average FRUE is 0.4859, with a growth potential of 51.41% in financial resource utilization efficiency for sports infrastructure development. Further Eastern region is more efficient as compared to the Central and western regions. Beijing, Shanghai, Tibet, Hainan, and Guangdong are top performers in FRUE. Further, the value of TGR in the East is 0.9787 which is higher than in Central (0.4977), and Western (0.5821) regions. It indicates that the eastern region contains superior production technology in the development of the sports infrastructure in China. Moreover, the average TFPC value is 1.035 witnessed a 3.5% growth, primarily determined by technological change (TC). As TC = 1.0273 is higher than efficiency change EC = 0.997. The eastern region has a higher average TFPC of 1.048, indicating higher total factor productivity growth in sports infrastructure development. Beijing, Liaoning, Tianjin, Shanghai, and Zhejiang are the top performers in the TFP growth over the study period. Finally, the Kruskal-Wallis test proved the statistically significant difference in three regions of China for FRUE, TGR, and TFPC in sports infrastructure development.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sports resources utilization efficiency, productivity change, and regional production technology heterogeneity in Chinese Provinces: DEA-SBM and Malmquist Index Approaches
    Zhang, Hanzhong
    Shi, Youkuan
    Jiang, Xuetao
    Xu, Xiaowei
    Shah, Wasi Ul Hassan
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (08):
  • [2] Efficiency evaluation, regional technological heterogeneity and determinant of total factor productivity change in China's healthcare system
    Xu, Xiaowei
    Yasmeen, Rizwana
    Shah, Wasi Ul Hassan
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [3] The impact of climate change and production technology heterogeneity on China's agricultural total factor productivity and production efficiency
    Shah, Wasi Ul Hassan
    Lu, Yuting
    Liu, Jianhua
    Rehman, Abdul
    Yasmeen, Rizwana
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 907
  • [4] Forestry Resource Efficiency, Total Factor Productivity Change, and Regional Technological Heterogeneity in China
    Shah, Wasi Ul Hassan
    Hao, Gang
    Yan, Hong
    Shen, Jintao
    Yasmeen, Rizwana
    [J]. FORESTS, 2024, 15 (01):
  • [5] Financial Development and Total Factor Productivity Growth: Evidence from China
    Han, Jian
    Shen, Yanzhi
    [J]. EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2015, 51 : S261 - S274
  • [6] Economic environment, technology diffusion, and growth of regional total factor productivity in China
    Jiang, Yanqing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHINESE ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS STUDIES, 2011, 9 (02) : 151 - 161
  • [7] Natural resources utilization efficiency evaluation, determinant of productivity change, and production technology heterogeneity across developed and developing G20 economies
    Shah, Wasi Ul Hassan
    Hao, Gang
    Yan, Hong
    Yasmeen, Rizwana
    Xu, Xiaowei
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2024, 77
  • [8] Financial Technology Development and Green Total Factor Productivity
    Hu, Wentao
    Li, Xiaoxiao
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (13)
  • [9] Industry Efficiency and Total Factor Productivity Growth under Resources and Environmental Constraint in China
    Tao, Feng
    Li, Ling
    Xia, X. H.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2012,
  • [10] The Growth of Total Factor Productivity in China's Agriculture: Technology Promoted or Efficiency Driven
    Li Gucheng
    Feng Zhongchao
    Fan Lixia
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS I AND II, 2009, : 1670 - 1687