The effects of previous abdominal surgery and the utilisation of modified access techniques on the operative difficulty and outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration

被引:0
|
作者
Lucocq, James [1 ]
Nassar, Ahmad H. M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ninewells Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Surg, Dundee, Scotland
[2] Univ Hosp Monklands, Laparoscop Biliary Unit, Airdrie, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
[4] Golden Jubilee Natl Hosp, Glasgow, Scotland
关键词
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Previous abdominal surgery; Abdominal scars; Adhesiolysis; Modified access; Complications; Difficulty grading; RAPID ENTRY; TROCAR; EXPERIENCE; CONVERSION; ADHESIONS; SAFE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-024-10949-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Early reports suggested that previous abdominal surgery was a relative contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) on account of difficulty and potential access complications. This study analyses different types/systems of previous surgery and locations of scars and how they affect access difficulties. As modified access techniques to minimise risk of complications are under-reported the study details and evaluates them. Method Prospectively collected data from consecutive LC and common bile duct explorations (LCBDE) performed by a single surgeon over 30 years was analysed. Previous abdominal surgery was documented and peri-operative outcomes were compared with patients who had no previous surgery using Chi-squared analysis. Results Of 5916 LC and LCBDE, 1846 patients (31.2%) had previous abdominal surgery. The median age was 60 years. Those with previous surgery required more frequent duodenal (RR 1.07; p = 0.023), hepatic flexure (RR 1.11; p = 0.043) and distal adhesiolysis (RR 3.57; p < 0.001) and had more access related bowel injuries (0.4% vs. 0.0%; p < 0.001). Previous upper gastrointestinal and biliary surgery had the highest rates of adhesiolysis (76.3%), difficult cystic pedicles (58.8%), fundus-first approach (7.2%), difficulty grades (64.9% Grades 3-5) and utilisation of abdominal drains (71.1%). Previous open surgery resulted in longer operative time compared to previous laparoscopic procedures (65vs.55 min; p < 0.001), increased difficulty of pedicle dissection (42.4% vs. 36.0%; p < 0.05) and required more duodenal, hepatic flexure and distant adhesiolysis (p < 0.05) and fundus-first dissection (4% vs 2%; p < 0.05). Epigastric and supraumbilical access and access through umbilical and other hernias were used in 163 patients (8.8%) with no bowel complications. Conclusion The risks of access and adhesiolysis in patients with previous abdominal scars undergoing biliary surgery are dependent on the nature of previous surgery. Previous open, upper gastrointestinal and biliary surgery carried the most significant risks. Modified access techniques can be adopted to safely mitigate these risks.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:4559 / 4570
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [21] Outcomes Of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration And Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; A Single Centre Review From A District General Hospital In Northern Ireland
    Winter, Jonny
    Ainley, Paul
    Gudyma, Jaroslaw
    Eltayeb, Omer
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [22] Outcomes of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; a Single Centre Review from a District General Hospital in Northern Ireland
    Winter, J.
    Ainley, P.
    McGuinness, E.
    Gudyma, J.
    Eltayeb, O.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [23] The Incidence and Outcomes of Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Bile Duct Exploration on a Unit Adopting Index Admission Surgery for all comers. A Review of 5750 patients
    Welsh, Silje
    Nassar, Ahmad
    Sallam, Mahmour
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109
  • [24] Immediate Laparoscopic Transcystic Common Bile Duct Exploration for CBD Stones found incidentally during Day Surgery Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy with routine cholangiogram
    Ramar, S.
    Durkin, N.
    Davies, E.
    Chang, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 : 61 - 62
  • [25] Use of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) Combined with Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LCBDE): A Cohort Study
    Zhang, Nannan
    Wu, Gang
    Zhou, Yuanhang
    Liao, Zhiwei
    Guo, Jinxing
    Liu, Yongjun
    Huang, Qi
    Li, Xiaodong
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2020, 26
  • [26] 929 The Incidence and Outcomes of Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Bile Duct Exploration on a Unit Adopting Index Admission Surgery for All Comers. a Review of 5750 Patients
    Welsh, S.
    Sallam, M.
    Nassar, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 109 (SUPPL 6)
  • [27] Conversion to open surgery during laparoscopic common bile duct exploration: predictive factors and impact on the perioperative outcomes
    Paya-Llorente, Carmen
    Domingo-del Pozo, Carlos
    Gonzalvez-Guardiola, Paula
    Santarrufina-Martinez, Sandra
    Pareja-Ibars, Eugenia
    Martinez-Perez, Aleix
    HPB, 2022, 24 (01) : 87 - 93
  • [28] Primary Closure Versus T-Tube Drainage Following Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Patients With Previous Biliary Surgery
    Wan Zhen
    Wang Xu-Zhen
    Fu Nan-Tao
    Li Yong
    Xiao Wei-Dong
    Zheng Dong-Hui
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2021, 87 (01) : 50 - 55
  • [29] Near-infrared cholangiography can increase the chance of success in laparoscopic approaches to common bile duct stones, even with previous abdominal surgery
    Tzeng, Wei-Juo
    Lin, Yu-Hung
    Hou, Teng-Yuan
    Yin, Shih-Min
    Lin, Yu-Cheng
    Liu, Yueh-Wei
    Liu, Yu-Yin
    Li, Wei-Feng
    Wang, Chih-Chi
    Marescaux, Jacques
    Diana, Michele
    BMC SURGERY, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [30] Near-infrared cholangiography can increase the chance of success in laparoscopic approaches to common bile duct stones, even with previous abdominal surgery
    Wei-Juo Tzeng
    Yu-Hung Lin
    Teng-Yuan Hou
    Shih‑Min Yin
    Yu-Cheng Lin
    Yueh-Wei Liu
    Yu-Yin Liu
    Wei-Feng Li
    Chih-Chi Wang
    Jacques Marescaux
    Michele Diana
    BMC Surgery, 23