The effects of previous abdominal surgery and the utilisation of modified access techniques on the operative difficulty and outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration

被引:0
|
作者
Lucocq, James [1 ]
Nassar, Ahmad H. M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Ninewells Hosp & Med Sch, Dept Surg, Dundee, Scotland
[2] Univ Hosp Monklands, Laparoscop Biliary Unit, Airdrie, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Univ Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland
[4] Golden Jubilee Natl Hosp, Glasgow, Scotland
关键词
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Previous abdominal surgery; Abdominal scars; Adhesiolysis; Modified access; Complications; Difficulty grading; RAPID ENTRY; TROCAR; EXPERIENCE; CONVERSION; ADHESIONS; SAFE;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-024-10949-x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Early reports suggested that previous abdominal surgery was a relative contraindication to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) on account of difficulty and potential access complications. This study analyses different types/systems of previous surgery and locations of scars and how they affect access difficulties. As modified access techniques to minimise risk of complications are under-reported the study details and evaluates them. Method Prospectively collected data from consecutive LC and common bile duct explorations (LCBDE) performed by a single surgeon over 30 years was analysed. Previous abdominal surgery was documented and peri-operative outcomes were compared with patients who had no previous surgery using Chi-squared analysis. Results Of 5916 LC and LCBDE, 1846 patients (31.2%) had previous abdominal surgery. The median age was 60 years. Those with previous surgery required more frequent duodenal (RR 1.07; p = 0.023), hepatic flexure (RR 1.11; p = 0.043) and distal adhesiolysis (RR 3.57; p < 0.001) and had more access related bowel injuries (0.4% vs. 0.0%; p < 0.001). Previous upper gastrointestinal and biliary surgery had the highest rates of adhesiolysis (76.3%), difficult cystic pedicles (58.8%), fundus-first approach (7.2%), difficulty grades (64.9% Grades 3-5) and utilisation of abdominal drains (71.1%). Previous open surgery resulted in longer operative time compared to previous laparoscopic procedures (65vs.55 min; p < 0.001), increased difficulty of pedicle dissection (42.4% vs. 36.0%; p < 0.05) and required more duodenal, hepatic flexure and distant adhesiolysis (p < 0.05) and fundus-first dissection (4% vs 2%; p < 0.05). Epigastric and supraumbilical access and access through umbilical and other hernias were used in 163 patients (8.8%) with no bowel complications. Conclusion The risks of access and adhesiolysis in patients with previous abdominal scars undergoing biliary surgery are dependent on the nature of previous surgery. Previous open, upper gastrointestinal and biliary surgery carried the most significant risks. Modified access techniques can be adopted to safely mitigate these risks.
引用
收藏
页码:4559 / 4570
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous upper abdominal surgery
    Jisheng Zhu
    Gen Sun
    Le Hong
    Xiaohua Li
    Yong Li
    Weidong Xiao
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2018, 32 : 4893 - 4899
  • [2] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in patients with previous upper abdominal surgery
    Zhu, Jisheng
    Sun, Gen
    Hong, Le
    Li, Xiaohua
    Li, Yong
    Xiao, Weidong
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2018, 32 (12): : 4893 - 4899
  • [3] Operative Difficulty, Morbidity and Mortality Are Unrelated to Obesity in Elective or Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Bile Duct Exploration
    Nassar, Ahmad H. M.
    Khan, Khurram S.
    Ng, Hwei J.
    Sallam, Mahmoud
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2022, 26 (09) : 1863 - 1872
  • [4] Operative Difficulty, Morbidity and Mortality Are Unrelated to Obesity in Elective or Emergency Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Bile Duct Exploration
    Ahmad H. M. Nassar
    Khurram S. Khan
    Hwei J. Ng
    Mahmoud Sallam
    [J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2022, 26 : 1863 - 1872
  • [5] The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery
    Yong Huang
    Qian Feng
    Kai Wang
    Xiaoli Xiong
    Shubing Zou
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 7
  • [6] The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for treatment patients with previous abdominal surgery
    Huang, Yong
    Feng, Qian
    Wang, Kai
    Xiong, Xiaoli
    Zou, Shubing
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [7] The incidence, operative difficulty and outcomes of staged versus index admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration for all comers: a review of 5750 patients
    Welsh, Silje
    Nassar, Ahmad H. M.
    Sallam, Mahmoud
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (11): : 8221 - 8230
  • [8] The incidence, operative difficulty and outcomes of staged versus index admission laparoscopic cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration for all comers: a review of 5750 patients
    Silje Welsh
    Ahmad H. M. Nassar
    Mahmoud Sallam
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 8221 - 8230
  • [9] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure is beneficial for patients with previous upper abdominal surgery
    Bin Xu
    Tingyi Luo
    Tingsong Yang
    Shilin Wang
    Hongbo Meng
    Jian Gong
    Bo Zhou
    Wenyan Zheng
    Zhenshun Song
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 1053 - 1063
  • [10] Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure is beneficial for patients with previous upper abdominal surgery
    Xu, Bin
    Luo, Tingyi
    Yang, Tingsong
    Wang, Shilin
    Meng, Hongbo
    Gong, Jian
    Zhou, Bo
    Zheng, Wenyan
    Song, Zhenshun
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (02): : 1053 - 1063