Optimal designs for nonlinear mixed-effects models using competitive swarm optimizer with mutated agents

被引:0
|
作者
Cui, Elvis Han [1 ]
Zhang, Zizhao [1 ,2 ]
Wong, Weng Kee [1 ]
机构
[1] UCLA, Dept Biostat, 650 Charles Young Dr S, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Alibaba Grp, 969 West Wen Yi Rd, Hangzhou 311121, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Bayesian-optimal design; C-optimality; Equivalence theorem; Fractional polynomial; Random effects; Sensitivity plot; NATURE-INSPIRED OPTIMIZATION; FRACTIONAL POLYNOMIALS; POISSON; ALGORITHMS; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1007/s11222-024-10468-8
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Nature-inspired meta-heuristic algorithms are increasingly used in many disciplines to tackle challenging optimization problems. Our focus is to apply a newly proposed nature-inspired meta-heuristics algorithm called CSO-MA to solve challenging design problems in biosciences and demonstrate its flexibility to find various types of optimal approximate or exact designs for nonlinear mixed models with one or several interacting factors and with or without random effects. We show that CSO-MA is efficient and can frequently outperform other algorithms either in terms of speed or accuracy. The algorithm, like other meta-heuristic algorithms, is free of technical assumptions and flexible in that it can incorporate cost structure or multiple user-specified constraints, such as, a fixed number of measurements per subject in a longitudinal study. When possible, we confirm some of the CSO-MA generated designs are optimal with theory by developing theory-based innovative plots. Our applications include searching optimal designs to estimate (i) parameters in mixed nonlinear models with correlated random effects, (ii) a function of parameters for a count model in a dose combination study, and (iii) parameters in a HIV dynamic model. In each case, we show the advantages of using a meta-heuristic approach to solve the optimization problem, and the added benefits of the generated designs.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On the Estimation of Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models and Latent Curve Models for Longitudinal Data
    Blozis, Shelley A.
    Harring, Jeffrey R.
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2016, 23 (06) : 904 - 920
  • [42] OPTIMAL DESIGNS FOR NONLINEAR MODELS WITH RANDOM BLOCK EFFECTS
    Wang, Xin
    Yang, Min
    Zheng, Wei
    STATISTICA SINICA, 2019, 29 (01) : 283 - 302
  • [43] ANALYSIS OF REACTION TIMES USING MIXED-EFFECTS MODELS
    Radanovic, Jelena
    Vaci, Nemanja
    PRIMENJENA PSIHOLOGIJA, 2013, 6 (03): : 311 - 332
  • [44] Using mixed-effects models in reliability generalization studies
    Beretvas, SN
    Pastor, DA
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2003, 63 (01) : 75 - 95
  • [45] A note on the use of Laplace's approximation for nonlinear mixed-effects models
    Vonesh, EF
    BIOMETRIKA, 1996, 83 (02) : 447 - 452
  • [46] Examination of Nonlinear and Functional Mixed-Effects Models with Nonparametrically Generated Data
    Fine, Kimberly L.
    Grimm, Kevin J.
    MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2021, 56 (04) : 669 - 686
  • [47] Two-stage Adaptive Designs in Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Models: an Evaluation by Simulation for a Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model in Oncology
    Lestini, Giulia
    Dumont, Cyrielle
    Mentre, France
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2014, 41 : S41 - S41
  • [48] An optimal test for variance components of multivariate mixed-effects linear models
    Aryal, Subhash
    Bhaumik, Dulal K.
    Mathew, Thomas
    Gibbons, Robert D.
    JOURNAL OF MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS, 2014, 124 : 166 - 178
  • [49] Nonlinear mixed-effects models to analyze actin dynamics in dendritic spines
    Gioia Di Credico
    Silvia Pelucchi
    Francesco Pauli
    Ramona Stringhi
    Elena Marcello
    Valeria Edefonti
    Scientific Reports, 15 (1)
  • [50] Estimating the age–diameter relationship of oak species in Switzerland using nonlinear mixed-effects models
    Brigitte Rohner
    Harald Bugmann
    Christof Bigler
    European Journal of Forest Research, 2013, 132 : 751 - 764