Diagnostic accuracy of ESR1 mutation detection by cell-free DNA in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

被引:0
|
作者
Raei, Maedeh [1 ]
Heydari, Keyvan [1 ,2 ]
Tabarestani, Mohammad [2 ]
Razavi, Alireza [2 ]
Mirshafiei, Fatemeh [2 ]
Esmaeily, Fatemeh [2 ]
Taheri, Mahsa [3 ]
Hoseini, Aref [2 ]
Nazari, Hojjatollah [4 ]
Shamshirian, Danial [5 ]
Alizadeh-Navaei, Reza [1 ]
机构
[1] Mazandaran Univ Med Sci, Noncommunicable Dis Inst, Gastrointestinal Canc Res Ctr, Sari 44817844718, Sari, Iran
[2] Mazandaran Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Sch Med, Sari, Iran
[3] Qazvin Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Qazvin, Iran
[4] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Biomed Engn, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[5] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Natl Res Inst TB & Lung Dis NRITLD, Chron Resp Dis Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
ESR1; Breast cancer; Cell-free DNA; Diagnosis; Meta-analysis; CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA; METASTATIC-DISEASE; LIQUID BIOPSY; ESTROGEN; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; TISSUE; HETEROGENEITY; MULTICENTER; STATISTICS;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-024-12674-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundEstrogen receptors express in nearly 70% of breast cancers (ER-positive). Estrogen receptor alpha plays a fundamental role as a significant factor in breast cancer progression for the early selection of therapeutic approaches. Accordingly, there has been a surge of attention to non-invasive techniques, including circulating Cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) or Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA), to detect and track ESR1 genotype. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the diagnosis accuracy of ESR1 mutation detection by cell-free DNA in breast cancer patientsthrough a systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis.MethodsPubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched up to 6 April 2022. Diagnostic studies on ESR1 measurement by cfDNA, which was confirmed using the tumour tissue biopsy, have been included in the study. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were considered to analyse the data.ResultsOut of 649 papers, 13 papers with 15 cohorts, including 389 participants, entered the meta-analyses. The comprehensive meta-analysis indicated a high sensitivity (75.52, 95% CI 60.19-90.85), specificity (88.20, 95% CI 80.99-95.40), and high accuracy of 88.96 (95% CI 83.23-94.69) for plasma ESR1. We also found a moderate PPV of 56.94 (95% CI 41.70-72.18) but a high NPV of 88.53 (95% CI 82.61-94.44). We also found an NLR of 0.443 (95% CI 0.09-0.79) and PLR of 1.60 (95% CI 1.20-1.99).ConclusionThis systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis reveal that plasma cfDNA testing exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in detecting ESR1 mutations in breast cancer patients. This suggests that the test could be a valuable diagnostic tool. It may serve as a dependable and non-invasive technique for identifying ESR1 mutations in breast cancer patients. However, more extensive research is needed to confirm its prognostic value.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diagnostic Accuracy of Droplet Digital PCR and Amplification Refractory Mutation System PCR for Detecting EGFR Mutation in Cell-Free DNA of Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Li, Caichen
    He, Qihua
    Liang, Hengrui
    Cheng, Bo
    Li, Jianfu
    Xiong, Shan
    Zhao, Yi
    Guo, Minzhang
    Liu, Zhichao
    He, Jianxing
    Liang, Wenhua
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2020, 10
  • [42] Diagnostic accuracy of circulating-free DNA for the determination of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yinzhong, Wang
    Miaomiao, Wang
    Xiaoxue, Tian
    Qian, Wang
    Meng, Qi
    Junqiang, Lei
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 23 (01) : 63 - 69
  • [43] Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis
    Uhlig, Johannes
    Uhlig, Annemarie
    Biggemann, Lorenz
    Fischer, Uwe
    Lotz, Joachim
    Wienbeck, Susanne
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (03) : 1194 - 1202
  • [44] Diagnostic accuracy of cone-beam breast computed tomography: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis
    Johannes Uhlig
    Annemarie Uhlig
    Lorenz Biggemann
    Uwe Fischer
    Joachim Lotz
    Susanne Wienbeck
    [J]. European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 1194 - 1202
  • [45] Deep Learning for Detection of Periapical Radiolucent Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
    Sadr, Soroush
    Mohammad-Rahimi, Hossein
    Motamedian, Saeed Reza
    Motie, Parisa
    Vinayahalingam, Shankeeth
    Dianat, Omid
    Nosrat, Ali
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2023, 49 (03) : 248 - 261.e3
  • [46] Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Value of Cell-free DNA for Renal Cancer
    Xu, Yipeng
    Jiang, Yingjun
    Yu, Mingke
    Lou, Jianmin
    Song, Mei
    Xu, Han
    Cui, Yingying
    Zeng, Xiaowei
    Wang, Qibo
    Ma, Hanyun
    Wang, Zongping
    Zhu, Shaoxing
    Li, Guorong
    Zhao, An
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MOLECULAR BIOSCIENCES, 2021, 8
  • [47] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy of miRNAs in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer
    Sun, Xiao
    Zhou, Xiaobin
    Zhang, Yuan
    Zhu, Xiaoyan
    Liu, Haihua
    [J]. DISEASE MARKERS, 2018, 2018
  • [48] Diagnostic accuracy of cancer antigen 125 forendometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hirsch, M.
    Duffy, J. M. N.
    Davis, C. J.
    Nieves Plana, M.
    Khan, K. S.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2016, 123 (11) : 1761 - 1768
  • [49] Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Deep Learning Detection of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Komolafe, Temitope Emmanuel
    Cao, Yuzhu
    Nguchu, Benedictor Alexander
    Monkam, Patrice
    Olaniyi, Ebenezer Obaloluwa
    Sun, Haotian
    Zheng, Jian
    Yang, Xiaodong
    [J]. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2021, 28 (11) : 1507 - 1523
  • [50] The diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy for basal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Reiter, Ofer
    Mimouni, Ilit
    Gdalevich, Michael
    Marghoob, Ashfaq A.
    Levi, Assi
    Hodak, Emmilia
    Leshem, Yael Anne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2019, 80 (05) : 1380 - 1388