Diagnostic accuracy of ESR1 mutation detection by cell-free DNA in breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

被引:0
|
作者
Raei, Maedeh [1 ]
Heydari, Keyvan [1 ,2 ]
Tabarestani, Mohammad [2 ]
Razavi, Alireza [2 ]
Mirshafiei, Fatemeh [2 ]
Esmaeily, Fatemeh [2 ]
Taheri, Mahsa [3 ]
Hoseini, Aref [2 ]
Nazari, Hojjatollah [4 ]
Shamshirian, Danial [5 ]
Alizadeh-Navaei, Reza [1 ]
机构
[1] Mazandaran Univ Med Sci, Noncommunicable Dis Inst, Gastrointestinal Canc Res Ctr, Sari 44817844718, Sari, Iran
[2] Mazandaran Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Sch Med, Sari, Iran
[3] Qazvin Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Qazvin, Iran
[4] Univ Technol Sydney, Sch Biomed Engn, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
[5] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Natl Res Inst TB & Lung Dis NRITLD, Chron Resp Dis Res Ctr, Tehran, Iran
关键词
ESR1; Breast cancer; Cell-free DNA; Diagnosis; Meta-analysis; CIRCULATING TUMOR DNA; METASTATIC-DISEASE; LIQUID BIOPSY; ESTROGEN; SPECIFICITY; SENSITIVITY; TISSUE; HETEROGENEITY; MULTICENTER; STATISTICS;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-024-12674-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundEstrogen receptors express in nearly 70% of breast cancers (ER-positive). Estrogen receptor alpha plays a fundamental role as a significant factor in breast cancer progression for the early selection of therapeutic approaches. Accordingly, there has been a surge of attention to non-invasive techniques, including circulating Cell-free DNA (ccfDNA) or Cell-Free DNA (cfDNA), to detect and track ESR1 genotype. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the diagnosis accuracy of ESR1 mutation detection by cell-free DNA in breast cancer patientsthrough a systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis.MethodsPubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched up to 6 April 2022. Diagnostic studies on ESR1 measurement by cfDNA, which was confirmed using the tumour tissue biopsy, have been included in the study. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were considered to analyse the data.ResultsOut of 649 papers, 13 papers with 15 cohorts, including 389 participants, entered the meta-analyses. The comprehensive meta-analysis indicated a high sensitivity (75.52, 95% CI 60.19-90.85), specificity (88.20, 95% CI 80.99-95.40), and high accuracy of 88.96 (95% CI 83.23-94.69) for plasma ESR1. We also found a moderate PPV of 56.94 (95% CI 41.70-72.18) but a high NPV of 88.53 (95% CI 82.61-94.44). We also found an NLR of 0.443 (95% CI 0.09-0.79) and PLR of 1.60 (95% CI 1.20-1.99).ConclusionThis systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis reveal that plasma cfDNA testing exhibits high sensitivity and specificity in detecting ESR1 mutations in breast cancer patients. This suggests that the test could be a valuable diagnostic tool. It may serve as a dependable and non-invasive technique for identifying ESR1 mutations in breast cancer patients. However, more extensive research is needed to confirm its prognostic value.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diagnostic Accuracy of PIK3CA Mutation Detection by Circulating Free DNA in Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy
    Zhou, Yidong
    Wang, Changjun
    Zhu, Hanjiang
    Lin, Yan
    Pan, Bo
    Zhang, Xiaohui
    Huang, Xin
    Xu, Qianqian
    Xu, Yali
    Sun, Qiang
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (06):
  • [2] Evaluation of cell-free DNA accuracy as diagnostic biomarker for prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Caixia
    Chen, Chunfeng
    Sadeghi, Morteza
    [J]. BIOTECHNOLOGY AND APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 69 (02) : 749 - 766
  • [3] Diagnostic accuracy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell-free DNA for tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yu, Guocan
    Shen, Yanqin
    Ye, Bo
    Shi, Yan
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (06):
  • [4] Digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alabousi, Mostafa
    Zha, Nanxi
    Salameh, Jean-Paul
    Samoilov, Lucy
    Sharifabadi, Anahita Dehmoobad
    Pozdnyakov, Alex
    Sadeghirad, Behnam
    Freitas, Vivianne
    McInnes, Matthew D. F.
    Alabousi, Abdullah
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (04) : 2058 - 2071
  • [5] Digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer detection: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mostafa Alabousi
    Nanxi Zha
    Jean-Paul Salameh
    Lucy Samoilov
    Anahita Dehmoobad Sharifabadi
    Alex Pozdnyakov
    Behnam Sadeghirad
    Vivianne Freitas
    Matthew D. F. McInnes
    Abdullah Alabousi
    [J]. European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 2058 - 2071
  • [6] The diagnostic accuracy of digital PCR, ARMS and NGS for detecting KRAS mutation in cell-free DNA of patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ye, Peng
    Cai, Peiling
    Xie, Jing
    Wei, Yuanyuan
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (03):
  • [7] Diagnostic test accuracy of detecting donor-derived cell-free DNA In renal transplant rejection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wong, Michael
    Tryliskyy, Yegor
    Rashid, Raja
    Siddiraju, Koushik
    Barman, Sowrav
    Shuymeko, Vlad
    Sharma, Ajay
    Hossain, Mohammad
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 108 (09) : 404 - 404
  • [8] Diagnostic accuracy of xpert test in tuberculosis detection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kaur, Ravdeep
    Kachroo, Kavita
    Sharma, Jitendar Kumar
    Vatturi, Satyanarayana Murthy
    Dang, Amit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2016, 8 (01) : 32 - 40
  • [9] Diagnostic test accuracy: methods for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Campbell, Jared M.
    Klugar, Miloslav
    Ding, Sandrine
    Carmody, Dennis P.
    Hakonsen, Sasja J.
    Jadotte, Yuri T.
    White, Sarahlouise
    Munn, Zachary
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTHCARE, 2015, 13 (03) : 154 - 162
  • [10] Diagnostic Accuracy of BRAF Immunohistochemistry in Colorectal Cancer: a Meta-Analysis and Diagnostic Test Accuracy Review
    Pyo, Jung-Soo
    Sohn, Jin Hee
    Kang, Guhyun
    [J]. PATHOLOGY & ONCOLOGY RESEARCH, 2016, 22 (04) : 831 - 837