Evaluating cancer patient-reported experience measures against health literacy best practices

被引:0
|
作者
Giannopoulos, Eleni [1 ]
Moody, Lesley [4 ,5 ]
Mackinnon, Rebecca [1 ,2 ]
Gill, Bhajan [1 ,3 ]
Giuliani, Meredith E. [1 ,6 ,7 ]
Papadakos, Janet K. [1 ,5 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Canc Hlth Literacy Res Ctr, 585 Univ Ave,ELLICSR PMB B-130, Toronto, ON M5G 2N2, Canada
[2] Univ Guelph, Sch Publ Hlth, Guelph, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Ambulatory Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Princess Margaret Canc Ctr, Radiat Med Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Hlth Network, Inst Educ Res, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Patient-reported experience measures; Patient experience; Health literacy; Cancer; Survey development; Patient-centered care; OUTCOME MEASURES; MEASURES PREMS; READABILITY; PROVIDERS;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-024-08838-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposePositive patient experiences can lead to better adherence to cancer treatment and greater patient health outcomes. The primary aim of this descriptive study was to determine whether commonly used cancer PREMs have been developed according to health literacy best practices. The secondary and third aims were to examine the development of PREMs and to assess their comprehensiveness against principles of patient-centered care.MethodsTo assess adherence to best practice literacy principles regarding readability and understandability of commonly used cancer PREMs, three validated readability calculators and a validated instrument were utilized. To better understand how PREMs were developed, data about survey items, patient involvement, and expert consultation were collected. Finally, the Picker framework was used to evaluate the comprehensiveness of PREMs against principles of patient-centered care.ResultsThirty-five PREMs studies met inclusion criteria for the study. The mean reading grade level of cancer PREMs was 9.7 (SD = 0.75, range = 8.2-11.2) with best practice recommendation being a grade 6 reading grade level. Twenty-eight PREMs were rated on understandability, with a mean score of 74% (SD = 10.6, range = 46-93%, with optimal score of greater than 80%). The mean number of items across PREMs was 49 (SD = 31, range = 13-136). Recommendations for the number of items to include in a questionnaire is 25-30 items. Most PREMs (n = 33, 94.3%) asked >= 1 double-barreled question. All PREMs addressed >= 2 patient-centered care principles.ConclusionCancer PREMs included in this study did not meet evidence-informed thresholds for readability and understandability. As such, it is possible that there may be gaps in how we understand the care experiences of low health literacy populations. Future development of PREMs should engage patients with low health literacy to ensure their perspectives are accurately captured and that PREMs are designed to meet the needs of all patients.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Patient-reported outcomes Recording and evaluating patient-reported endpoints
    Hilser, Thomas
    Darr, Christopher
    Gruenwald, Viktor
    ONKOLOGIE, 2022, 28 (10): : 940 - 946
  • [32] Patient-reported measures: how useful in health economics?
    Anne-Gaëlle Le Corroller
    Julia Bonastre
    The European Journal of Health Economics, 2023, 24 : 1 - 4
  • [33] The utility of patient-reported outcome measures in mental health
    Roe, David
    Slade, Mike
    Jones, Nev
    WORLD PSYCHIATRY, 2022, 21 (01) : 56 - 57
  • [34] A codevelopment process to advance methods for the use of patient-reported outcome measures and patient-reported experience measures with people who are homeless and experience chronic illness
    Donald, Erin E.
    Whitlock, Kara
    Dansereau, Tracy
    Sands, Daniel J.
    Small, David
    Stajduhar, Kelli, I
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2022, 25 (05) : 2264 - 2274
  • [35] Experience With the Routine Use of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients With Lung Cancer
    Crockett, Cathryn
    Price, James
    Pham, Mai
    Abdulwahid, Danya
    Bayman, Neil
    Blackhall, Fiona
    Bostock, Layla
    Califano, Raffaele
    Chan, Clara
    Coote, Joanna
    Cove-Smith, Laura
    Eaton, Marie
    Fenemore, Jacqueline
    Gomes, Fabio
    Harris, Margaret
    Halkyard, Emma
    Hughes, Sarah
    Lindsay, Colin
    Neal, Hilary
    Mcentee, Delyth
    Pemberton, Laura
    Sheikh, Hamid
    Summers, Yvonne
    Taylor, Paul
    Woolf, David
    Yorke, Janelle
    Faivre-Finn, Corinne
    JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2023, 7
  • [36] Experience With the Routine Use of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Patients With Lung Cancer
    Crockett, Cathryn
    Price, James
    Pham, Mai
    Abdulwahid, Danya
    Bayman, Neil
    Blackhall, Fiona
    Bostock, Layla
    Califano, Raffaele
    Chan, Clara
    Coote, Joanna
    Cove-Smith, Laura
    Eaton, Marie
    Fenemore, Jacqueline
    Gomes, Fabio
    Harris, Margaret
    Halkyard, Emma
    Hughes, Sarah
    Lindsay, Colin
    Neal, Hilary
    McEntee, Delyth
    Pemberton, Laura
    Sheikh, Hamid
    Summers, Yvonne
    Taylor, Paul
    Woolf, David
    Yorke, Janelle
    Faivre-Finn, Corinne
    JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2023, 7 : e2200150
  • [37] A systematic review of the validity and reliability of patient-reported experience measures
    Bull, Claudia
    Byrnes, Joshua
    Hettiarachchi, Ruvini
    Downes, Martin
    HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2019, 54 (05) : 1023 - 1035
  • [38] Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Stroke Care A Systematic Review
    Cornelis, Cosette
    den Hartog, Sanne J.
    Bastemeijer, Carla M.
    Roozenbeek, Bob
    Nederkoorn, Paul J.
    Van den Berg-vos, Renske M.
    STROKE, 2021, 52 (07) : 2432 - 2435
  • [39] PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME AND EXPERIENCE MEASURES IN MACULAR DEGENERATION AND GLAUCOMA
    Rac, Kathrin
    Lee, Graham
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2015, 43 : 104 - 105
  • [40] Understanding patient-reported outcome measures in colorectal cancer
    Besson, Alex
    Deftereos, Irene
    Chan, Steven
    Faragher, Ian G.
    Kinsella, Rita
    Yeung, Justin M. C.
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2019, 15 (10) : 1135 - 1146