Effect of Deep Fertilization with Slow/Controlled Release Fertilizer on N Fate in Clayey Soil Wheat Field

被引：0
|
作者：
Hou P.-F. [1 ,2 ]
Xue L.-X. [1 ]
Yuan W.-S. [3 ]
Cao S. [1 ,2 ]
Liu Y.-D. [1 ]
Xue L.-H. [1 ,2 ]
Yang L.-Z. [1 ,2 ]
机构：
[1] Key Laboratory of Agro-Environment in Downstream of Yangtze Plain of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing
[2] College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing
[3] Nanjing Institute of Agricultural Mechanization, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nanjing
来源：
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science | 2023年 / 44卷 / 01期
关键词：
clayey soil; deep fertilization; nitrogen loss; slow/controlled release fertilizer; soil inorganic nitrogen; wheat;
D O I：
10.13227/j.hjkx.202203255
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Clayey soil seriously affects water-holding capacity and nutrient movement. Adopting appropriate agronomic measures to optimize the distribution of soil inorganic nitrogen (SIN) and reduce the nitrogen (N) loss in this soil is the key to agricultural sustainable development. To clarify the effect of deep fertilization of slow/ controlled release fertilizer with sowing on N loss in a clayey soil wheat field, two types of fertilizers, conventional fertilizer (CN) and slow/ controlled release fertilizer (RCU), were selected in this study. Here, we evaluated the effects of these two fertilizer types on wheat yield, seasonal N runoff loss, ammonia volatilization, and N2O emissions in wheat fields in two typical fertilization modes (manual surface sowing and spreading (B) and belowground fertilization of slow/ controlled release urea with mechanized strip sowing (D)). The temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of SIN in topsoil were also analyzed. The results showed that under the same fertilizer type, the wheat yield of D treatment was significantly higher than that of B treatment, whereas the yield of RCU was notably higher than that of CN under the same fertilization mode. D-RCU achieved the highest yield of 6. 97 t.hm - 2 . The seasonal N losses from runoff and ammonia volatilization were higher than that from N2O emissions, and the responses of different N loss pathways to fertilizer types and fertilization methods were diverse. Fertilizer type and runoff occurrence time were the main influencing factors of N runoff loss, and N runoff loss of the RCU treatment was higher in the non-fertilization period. Unfortunately, affected by annual rainfall pattern, the seasonal N runoff loss of the RCU treatment (20. 35 kg.hm - 2 ) was significantly higher than that of the CN treatment (10. 49 kg.hm - 2 ). The late growth period was the main phase of ammonia volatilization, and the later period was jointly affected by fertilization modes and fertilizer types. The B-CN treatment induced the highest seasonal ammonia volatilization (18. 15 kg.hm - 2 ), which was significantly higher than that of the other treatments (7. 31-8. 38 kg.hm - 2 ). Additionally, the D-RCU treatment (2. 41 kg.hm - 2 ) tended to reduce the N2O emissions in comparison to that in the B-CN treatment (4. 02 kg.hm - 2 ). The results also indicated that the horizontal movement of SIN was higher than the vertical movement. Deep fertilization of RCU was conducive to optimizing the spatial and temporal distribution of SIN, which was the main reason for the increase in wheat yield and the control of N loss from wheat fields. These results suggest that RCU is a suitable alternative fertilizer for increasing yield and reducing N loss in clayey soil wheat fields; D-RCU can increase the wheat yield and reduce ammonia volatilization and N2O emissions in wheat fields by optimizing the spatial and temporal distribution of SIN, and its increasing effect on N runoff loss in the non-fertilization period deserves attention. © 2023 Science Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：473 / 481
页数：8
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [11] Azeem B, KuShaari K, Man Z B, Et al., Review on materials & methods to produce controlled release coated urea fertilizer, Journal of Controlled Release, 181, pp. 11-21, (2014)
  • [12] Liu H D, Liu W C, Gu Y H, Et al., Effect of interaction of slow-release fertilizer and planting density on yield and quality of winter wheat[ J], Journal of Triticeae Crops, 41, 11, pp. 1374-1382, (2021)
  • [13] Zheng W K, Zhang M, Liu Z G, Et al., Combining controlled-release urea and normal urea to improve the nitrogen use efficiency and yield under wheat-maize double cropping system [J], Field Crops Research, 197, pp. 52-62, (2016)
  • [14] Hou P F, Xue L X, Yu Y L, Et al., Control effect of side deep fertilization with slow-release fertilizer on ammonia volatilization from paddy fields, Environmental Science, 38, 12, pp. 5326-5332, (2017)
  • [15] Hao S L, Cai T Y, Feng X J, Et al., Effects of new fertilizers on the yield and soil biological activity of three major food crops: A global meta-analysis [ J ], Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 27, 9, pp. 1496-1505, (2021)
  • [16] Zhu S H, Liu L Y, Xu Y, Et al., Application of controlled release urea improved grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency: A meta-analysis, PLoS One, 15, 10, (2020)
  • [17] Zhao M, Zhou B Y, Ma W, Et al., Theoretical and technical models of quantitative regulation in food crop production system, Acta Agronomica Sinica, 45, 4, pp. 485-498, (2019)
  • [18] Chen D D, Zhao G Z, Bai T, Et al., Preparation and nutrient release mechanism of a polymer as slow-release compound fertilizer, Journal of the Chemical Society of Pakistan, 36, 4, pp. 647-653, (2014)
  • [19] Ransom C J, Jolley V D, Blair T A, Et al., Nitrogen release rates from slow- and controlled-release fertilizers influenced by placement and temperature, PloS one, 15, 6, (2020)
  • [20] Wang J J, Huang Y F, Long H Y, Et al., Simulations of water movement and solute transport through different soil texture configurations under negative-pressure irrigation, Hydrological Processes, 31, 14, pp. 2599-2612, (2017)
12345