Late diagnosis of anorectal malformation: how good is good enough?

被引:0
|
作者
Davidson, Joseph [1 ,2 ]
Zaparackaite, Indre [1 ]
Holbrook, Charlotte [1 ]
Thakkar, Hemanshoo [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Evelina London Childrens Hosp, Dept Paediat Surg, London SE1 7EH, England
[2] UCL, Great Ormond St Inst Child Hlth, London, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Sch Med, London, England
关键词
Anorectal malformation; Congenital anomaly; Newborn screening; Delayed diagnosis; FETAL; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/s00383-024-05765-2
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Purpose National data from the United Kingdom reported in 2016 have suggested that almost one quarter of babies with anorectal malformation (ARM) have a delay in diagnosis. The UK's Newborn Infant Physical Examination dictates a perineal examination should be performed within 72 h of birth. We sought to describe a tertiary single-centre experience of late presentation in the most recent 5 years. Methods A single-centre prospective registry of ARM patients (July 2018-March 2024) was analysed. Timing of presentation with anomaly was noted. Patients presenting > 72 h or having been discharged home were defined as a delayed diagnosis. Factors associated with delayed diagnosis were noted. ResultsSixty patients were included, of whom nine (15%) were diagnosed after 72 h [range 4-279 days]. This represents a non-significant improvement compared to 39/174 (22%) late diagnosed cases in the BAPS-CASS cohort from 2016 to 17 (p = 0.188). Presenting symptoms of obstruction (i.e. distension, vomiting, megarectum) were more common in late diagnosed patients (4/9 (44%) vs. 1/51(2%); p = 0.001). Anomalies producing meconium on the perineum were more likely to be diagnosed late (8/32 (25%) vs 1/28 (4%); p = 0.029). Complications and changes to clinical management for these cases are presented. Conclusion Although our regional rates of late diagnosis appear to be lower than previously reported national rates, there remains a significant number of infants who are diagnosed late especially those with visible perineal openings. These infants are more commonly symptomatic; entraining additional risks associated with an emergency presentation.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Good enough is good enough
    Pournelle, J
    BYTE, 1998, 23 (04): : 135 - +
  • [22] GOOD ENOUGH IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH
    PETTIT, GD
    VETERINARY SURGERY, 1991, 20 (05) : 279 - 280
  • [23] Is good enough, good enough?
    Greco, Peter M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2017, 151 (02) : 242 - 242
  • [24] Good enough is not good enough
    Reed, K
    IEEE SOFTWARE, 2003, 20 (05) : 109 - 109
  • [25] Good enough is good enough!
    Sidebotham, Charlotte
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2017, 67 (660): : 311 - 311
  • [26] HOW GOOD IS GOOD ENOUGH - DILEMMA IN ACCEPTANCE TESTING OF CONCRETE
    CHUNG, HW
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE, 1978, 75 (08): : 374 - 380
  • [27] How good is good enough in path analysis of fMRI data?
    Bullmore, ET
    Horwitz, B
    Honey, G
    Brammer, M
    Williams, S
    Sharma, T
    NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 11 (04) : 289 - 301
  • [28] Confirmation practice in pharmacogenetic testing; how good is good enough?
    Lunenburg, Carin A. T. C.
    Guchelaar, Henk-Jan
    van Schaik, Ron H. N.
    Neumaier, Michael
    Swen, Jesse J.
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2019, 490 : 77 - 80
  • [29] Indoor Service Coverage Predictions: How Good is Good enough?
    Wagen, Jean-Frederic
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FOURTH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 2010,
  • [30] FORECASTING RAIN FOR GROUNDNUT FARMERS - HOW GOOD IS GOOD ENOUGH
    GADGIL, S
    RAO, PRS
    JOSHI, NV
    SRIDHAR, S
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 1995, 68 (03): : 301 - 309