Late diagnosis of anorectal malformation: how good is good enough?

被引:0
|
作者
Davidson, Joseph [1 ,2 ]
Zaparackaite, Indre [1 ]
Holbrook, Charlotte [1 ]
Thakkar, Hemanshoo [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Evelina London Childrens Hosp, Dept Paediat Surg, London SE1 7EH, England
[2] UCL, Great Ormond St Inst Child Hlth, London, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Sch Med, London, England
关键词
Anorectal malformation; Congenital anomaly; Newborn screening; Delayed diagnosis; FETAL; MRI;
D O I
10.1007/s00383-024-05765-2
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Purpose National data from the United Kingdom reported in 2016 have suggested that almost one quarter of babies with anorectal malformation (ARM) have a delay in diagnosis. The UK's Newborn Infant Physical Examination dictates a perineal examination should be performed within 72 h of birth. We sought to describe a tertiary single-centre experience of late presentation in the most recent 5 years. Methods A single-centre prospective registry of ARM patients (July 2018-March 2024) was analysed. Timing of presentation with anomaly was noted. Patients presenting > 72 h or having been discharged home were defined as a delayed diagnosis. Factors associated with delayed diagnosis were noted. ResultsSixty patients were included, of whom nine (15%) were diagnosed after 72 h [range 4-279 days]. This represents a non-significant improvement compared to 39/174 (22%) late diagnosed cases in the BAPS-CASS cohort from 2016 to 17 (p = 0.188). Presenting symptoms of obstruction (i.e. distension, vomiting, megarectum) were more common in late diagnosed patients (4/9 (44%) vs. 1/51(2%); p = 0.001). Anomalies producing meconium on the perineum were more likely to be diagnosed late (8/32 (25%) vs 1/28 (4%); p = 0.029). Complications and changes to clinical management for these cases are presented. Conclusion Although our regional rates of late diagnosis appear to be lower than previously reported national rates, there remains a significant number of infants who are diagnosed late especially those with visible perineal openings. These infants are more commonly symptomatic; entraining additional risks associated with an emergency presentation.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] HOW GOOD IS GOOD ENOUGH
    HAWKER, P
    ELECTRONICS & WIRELESS WORLD, 1987, 93 (1615): : 546 - 546
  • [2] HOW GOOD IS GOOD ENOUGH
    MARIEN, R
    DATA PROCESSING, 1961, 3 (03): : 19 - 19
  • [3] How Good Is Good Enough?
    Sood, Vikram
    Pasquali, Sara K.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 114 (05): : 1737 - 1738
  • [4] How good is good enough?
    Heilman, P
    Hatfield, JL
    Rojas, K
    Ma, L
    Huddleston, J
    Ahuja, L
    Adkins, M
    JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2002, 57 (04) : 92A - 101A
  • [5] How Good Is "Good Enough"?
    Sundt, Thoralf M.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2013, 148 (01) : 10 - 11
  • [6] How Good Is Good Enough?
    Wiggins, Grant
    EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP, 2013, 71 (04) : 10 - 16
  • [7] HOW GOOD IS GOOD ENOUGH
    WALKER, B
    PHOTONICS SPECTRA, 1991, 25 (04) : 127 - &
  • [8] Quality of care: how good is good enough?
    Chassin, Mark R.
    ISRAEL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY RESEARCH, 2012, 1
  • [9] CUSTOMER SATISFACTION - HOW GOOD IS GOOD ENOUGH
    BABICH, P
    QUALITY PROGRESS, 1992, 25 (12) : 65 - 67
  • [10] Hemoglobin Determination: How Good is Good Enough?
    Pfeiffer, Christine M.
    Zhang, Mindy
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2024, 154 (07): : 1967 - 1969