Patterns of Pregabalin Users from Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities: Results from the French OPPIDUM Program from 2008 to 2022

被引:2
|
作者
Garnier, Clement [1 ,2 ]
Schein, Martin [1 ,2 ]
Lacroix, Clemence [1 ]
Jouve, Elisabeth [1 ]
Soeiro, Thomas [1 ]
Gentile, Gaetan [2 ]
Mestre, Maryse Lapeyre [3 ]
Micallef, Joelle [1 ]
机构
[1] Aix Marseille Univ, Ctr Evaluat & Informat Pharmacodependance Addictov, Serv Pharmacol Clin & Pharmacosurveillance, Inst Neurosci Syst,UMR 1106,INSERM,Univ Hosp,APHM, 270 Blvd St Marguerite, F-13009 Marseille, France
[2] Fac Sci Med & Paramed, Dept Univ Med Gen, Marseille, France
[3] UFR Sante Univ Toulouse Paul Sabatier, Serv Pharmacol Med & Clin, CEIP Addictovigilance Toulouse, CHU Toulouse,CIC 1436, F-31000 Toulouse, France
关键词
DRUG-ABUSE; DEPENDENCE; MISUSE; GABAPENTIN; LIABILITY; SIGNAL;
D O I
10.1007/s40263-024-01095-y
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionIn recent years, pregabalin has received growing attention due to its abuse liability. The aim of this study was to further characterize patterns of pregabalin users from substance abuse treatment facilities and detect changes in users profile over the study period. MethodsThe data source was the Observation des Produits Psychotropes Illicites ou D & eacute;tourn & eacute;s de leur Utilisation M & eacute;dicamenteuse (OPPIDUM) program, an annual, repeated, cross-sectional, nationwide, multicenter survey that collects consumption data from patients with substance use disorders. First, we described the characteristics of pregabalin users and their consumption patterns. We compared these data between 2008 and 2018 (P1) and 2019 and 2022 (P2). Second, we conducted a multiple correspondence analysis to identify profiles of users. ResultsFrom 2008 to 2022, 291 pregabalin users (0.37% of all users) from 116 substance abuse treatment facilities were identified. The number of pregabalin users was lower than 15 per year in P1 (n = 89) and between 40 and 60 per year in P2 (n = 202). The number of users who reported pregabalin as the first substance leading to dependence increased significantly in P2 compared with P1 (p < 0.005). When comparing P2 with P1, there was a significant increase in precarity (p < 0.001), users in prison (p = 0.002), withdrawal symptoms (p < 0.001), dependence (p < 0.001), use of higher dose of pregabalin (p = 0.029), and acquisition by deal/street market (p < 0.001). The multiple correspondence analysis allowed for the identification of distinct profiles of pregabalin users: (i) a cluster with mainly users from P1, who presented a simple use of pregabalin, and were older (> 45 years), were involved in opioid agonist treatment (OAT), and obtained pregabalin legally; and (ii) a cluster with mainly users from P2, who presented pregabalin dependence, and were younger (< 26 years), reported pregabalin as the first substance leading to dependence, used doses higher than the market authorization, were in severe precarity, and were in prison. ConclusionsThese data showed that the profile of pregabalin users has changed in the last years. Pregabalin use disorders also affect users without history of addiction.
引用
收藏
页码:743 / 751
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条