Factors influencing EFL teachers' provision of oral corrective feedback: the role of teaching experience

被引:0
|
作者
Soruc, Adem [1 ]
Yuksel, Dogan [2 ,5 ]
Mckinley, Jim [3 ]
Grimshaw, Trevor [4 ]
机构
[1] Samsun Univ, Samsun, Turkiye
[2] Open Univ, Milton Keynes, England
[3] Univ Coll London UCL, Inst Educ, London, England
[4] Univ Bath, Bath, England
[5] Open Univ, Fac Wellbeing Educ & Language Studies, Milton Keynes, England
来源
关键词
Oral corrective feedback; teachers' individual differences; teaching experience; classroom-based research; teachers' decisions; EFL; INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES; STATED BELIEFS; L2; PERCEPTIONS; KNOWLEDGE; LEARNERS;
D O I
10.1080/09571736.2024.2338346
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study highlights critical factors influencing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers' decisions to provide in-class oral corrective feedback (OCF). It explores the interplay between teachers' individual differences - namely educational background, teaching experience, and additional training - and their decisions regarding OCF. EFL teachers in three Turkish universities each had three hours of their speaking classes recorded. A thematic analysis of stimulated recall interview data revealed that teachers' decisions were influenced by learner-related, contextual, and teacher-specific factors. The teachers stated that they provided OCF because they believed that learners expected it. Learner-related factors such as emotions and low proficiency served as deterrents to OCF. Regarding the contextual factors, institutional expectations motivated the provision of OCF, while the nature of activities dissuaded teachers from administering OCF. The teacher factor most commonly cited as a stimulus for providing OCF was the inclination to elicit the correct form from students. The teachers were reluctant to provide OCF because they favoured delayed feedback at the end of the activity or lesson. Regression analysis of the video data revealed that only teaching experience contributed significantly to teachers' decision-making. The role of teaching experience is discussed, and suggestions are made regarding the provision of OCF.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Iranian EFL teachers and learners’ perceptions of grammar instruction and corrective feedback
    Mohammad Mohammadi
    Mohammad Hosssein Yousefi
    [J]. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 4
  • [22] EFL TEACHERS' PEDAGOGICAL BELIEFS AND THEIR CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK PREFERENCES IN IRAN (SHIRAZ)
    Zare, Fahime
    Jadidi, Esmaeil
    [J]. MODERN JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE TEACHING METHODS, 2016, 6 (01): : 976 - 985
  • [23] The role of collaborative inquiry in Iranian EFL teachers' reflective teaching: the case of teaching experience
    Dehghani, Ekram
    Rezvani, Ehsan
    Hadian, Bahram
    [J]. REFLECTIVE PRACTICE, 2023, 24 (04) : 543 - 558
  • [24] A study of pre-service EFL teachers' acceptance of online teaching and the influencing factors
    Sun, Weifeng
    Zou, Bin
    [J]. LANGUAGE LEARNING & TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 26 (02): : 38 - 49
  • [25] Oral corrective feedback: teachers' concerns and researchers' orientation
    Sepehrinia, Sajjad
    Mehdizadeh, Mostafa
    [J]. LANGUAGE LEARNING JOURNAL, 2018, 46 (04): : 483 - 500
  • [26] Libyan EFL learners' attitudes towards oral interactional corrective feedback
    Milad, Najat
    Mohammadzadeh, Behbood
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE TEACHING AND LEARNING, 2021, 11 (01): : 53 - 70
  • [27] Corrective feedback episodes in oral interaction: A comparison of a CLIL and an EFL classroom
    Milla, Ruth
    Garcia Mayo, Maria Pilar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGLISH STUDIES, 2014, 14 (01): : 1 - 20
  • [28] The role of learner engagement with corrective feedback in EFL/ESL classrooms
    Liu, Hao
    Feng, Mengya
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [29] The role of gender and teaching experience in reflective thinking among Moroccan EFL teachers
    Aqadoh, Hanane
    Trimasse, Naima
    [J]. REFLECTIVE PRACTICE, 2024, 25 (01) : 11 - 26
  • [30] Irinan EFL Teachers' Preferences For Corrective Feedback Types, implicit Vs Explicit
    Motlagh, Leily Nekuruh
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF 2ND GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON CONFERENCE ON LINGUISTICS AND FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING, 2015, 192 : 364 - 370