Cellular Operator Data Meets Counterfactual Machine Learning

被引:1
|
作者
Kala, Srikant Manas [1 ]
Mishra, Malvika [1 ]
Sathya, Vanlin [2 ]
Amano, Tatsuya [1 ]
Ghosh, Monisha [3 ]
Higashino, Teruo [4 ]
Yamaguchi, Hirozumi [1 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Univ, Grad Sch Informat Sci & Technol, Mobile Comp Lab, Osaka 5650871, Japan
[2] Celona Inc, Campbell, CA 95008 USA
[3] Univ Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
[4] Kyoto Tachibana Univ, Kyoto 6078175, Japan
来源
IEEE ACCESS | 2024年 / 12卷
关键词
Cellular networks; Predictive models; Optimization; Analytical models; Machine learning; Wireless fidelity; Data models; Explainable AI; Unlicensed spectrum; NR-U; cellular networks; operator data; machine learning; counterfactual analysis; explainable AI; optimization; COEXISTENCE;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3394312
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Unlicensed cellular networks and spectrum-sharing standards assist operators in meeting the ever-increasing demand for mobile data. However, several incumbents are already operational in these frequencies, rendering the wireless environment extremely dynamic and unpredictable. The challenges associated with unlicensed Licensed Assisted Access (LAA) operations in the 5 GHz band and New Radio in Unlicensed (NR-U) in the 6 GHz band are best addressed through a data-driven approach. This requires operator data from current cellular deployments. Further, from an operator's perspective, the precision and reliability of predictive models must be analyzed before deployment. Counterfactual machine learning is ideal for quantifying causal impact in a dynamic, unlicensed cellular environment. However, the literature lacks a framework that combines data-driven solutions, counterfactual analysis, and conventional optimization. This work contributes a dataset from the LAA networks of three major cellular operators in Chicago consisting of 15 features and 9676 samples. Additionally, it proposes a framework for analyzing the performance of unlicensed networks that leverages machine learning for predictive modeling, employs counterfactual analysis for model explainability and network performance enhancement, and utilizes optimization for validation. We show that operator data is necessary to build reliable prediction models for network throughput, and signal strength, among others. Further, the impact of network parameters is shown to differ in unlicensed and licensed cellular network models. Next, a counterfactual machine learning framework is proposed to explain and analyze the predictive models. The framework proposes counterfactual policies to enhance unlicensed cellular network performance. Finally, we validate the suggested counterfactual policies through joint network optimization.
引用
收藏
页码:64633 / 64653
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Infrared spectroscopy meets machine learning
    Murphy, Justine
    LASER FOCUS WORLD, 2024, 60 (10): : 13 - 15
  • [22] Machine Learning meets Kalman Filtering
    Carron, Andrea
    Todescato, Marco
    Carli, Ruggero
    Schenato, Luca
    Pillonetto, Gianluigi
    2016 IEEE 55TH CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2016, : 4594 - 4599
  • [23] Molecular Simulation Meets Machine Learning
    Sadus, Richard
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA, 2023, 69 (01): : 3 - 11
  • [24] LIBOR meets machine learning: A Lasso regression approach to detecting data irregularities
    Pontines, Victor
    Rummel, Ole
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 55
  • [25] The era of big data: Genome-scale modelling meets machine learning
    Antonakoudis, Athanasios
    Barbosa, Rodrigo
    Kotidis, Pavlos
    Kontoravdi, Cleo
    COMPUTATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL, 2020, 18 : 3287 - 3300
  • [26] Stratified Sampling Meets Machine Learning
    Lang, Kevin
    Liberty, Edo
    Shmakov, Konstantin
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE LEARNING, VOL 48, 2016, 48
  • [27] MACHINE LEARNING meets QUANTUM PHYSICS
    Das Sarma, Sankar
    Deng, Dong-Ling
    Duan, Lu-Ming
    PHYSICS TODAY, 2019, 72 (03) : 48 - 54
  • [28] Machine learning meets chemical physics
    Ceriotti, Michele
    Clementi, Cecilia
    Anatole von Lilienfeld, O.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 154 (16):
  • [29] Blockchain meets machine learning: a survey
    Safak Kayikci
    Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar
    Journal of Big Data, 11
  • [30] Causal Inference Meets Machine Learning
    Cui, Peng
    Shen, Zheyan
    Li, Sheng
    Yao, Liuyi
    Li, Yaliang
    Chu, Zhixuan
    Gao, Jing
    KDD '20: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 26TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY & DATA MINING, 2020, : 3527 - 3528