Hybrid multicriteria decision-making model for process selection for drinking water treatment

被引:0
|
作者
Ozgur, Cihan [1 ]
Baris, Deniz [2 ]
Bekaroglu, Sehnaz Sule Kaplan [2 ]
机构
[1] Isparta Univ Appl Sci, Sutculer Prof Dr Hasan Gurbuz Vocat Sch, Isparta, Turkiye
[2] Suleyman Demirel Univ, Engn Fac, Isparta, Turkiye
关键词
multicriteria analysis; pesticides; treatment processes; water sources; PHOTO-FENTON; MICROPOLLUTANTS REMOVAL; ADVANCED OXIDATION; CYPERMETHRIN; DIURON; NANOFILTRATION; DEGRADATION; PESTICIDES; BIODEGRADATION; ENVIRONMENT;
D O I
10.1002/ep.14390
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The overuse of pesticides in agriculture poses significant threats to human health and the environment. This study addresses the issue by proposing a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method, utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), to select the most suitable pesticide removal method for drinking water treatment. Focusing on the priority and selection of treatment options for specific pesticide groups, such as diuron and cypermethrin, based on toxicity and physicochemical properties, the study concludes that nanofiltration is best option for diuron removal, while granular activated carbon adsorption is effective for cypermethrin. The innovative hybrid MCDM (AHP + TOPSIS and AHP + VIKOR) approach, unprecedented in assessing pesticide removal methods for drinking water treatment, proves promising in ranking treatment processes for pesticides. The study emphasizes the serious consequences of excessive pesticide use, highlights treatment solutions like NF and GAC adsorption, and introduces cutting-edge hybrid MCDM techniques for selection treatment process that meet technical, economical, and environmental requirements. All of these factors combine to provide a novel approach not only used to select the best option from alternatives, but also to prioritize alternative processes in drinking water treatment at pesticide removal practices.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Evaluating the Validity of Multicriteria Decision-Making
    Potomkin M.M.
    [J]. Cybernetics and Systems Analysis, 2018, 54 (6) : 930 - 935
  • [42] MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING WITH INCOMPLETE DETERMINATION
    GLUCKAUFOVA, D
    [J]. EKONOMICKO-MATEMATICKY OBZOR, 1984, 20 (02): : 121 - 134
  • [43] STOCHASTIC MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING AND UNCERTAINTY
    MARESCHAL, B
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1986, 26 (01) : 58 - 64
  • [44] FUZZY INTEGRAL IN MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    GRABISCH, M
    [J]. FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1995, 69 (03) : 279 - 298
  • [45] A FUZZY METHOD FOR MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    TURUNEN, I
    JARVELAINEN, M
    DOHNAL, M
    [J]. ACTA POLYTECHNICA SCANDINAVICA-CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY SERIES, 1984, (154): : 1 - 28
  • [46] VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUES IN MULTICRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    VETSCHERA, R
    [J]. OR SPEKTRUM, 1994, 16 (04) : 227 - 241
  • [47] ON THE MATHEMATICAL TREATMENT OF THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
    RICHARD, T
    [J]. KYBERNETIK, 1962, 1 (04): : 131 - 138
  • [48] MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING ON SUPPLIER SELECTION USING SOCCER MODEL INTEGRATED WITH ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS
    AL Hazza, Muataz
    Dapit, Azura
    Bourini, Islam Faisal
    Muataz, Zubaidah
    Ali, Mohammad Yeakub
    [J]. IIUM ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2023, 24 (02): : 239 - 257
  • [49] A Novel Automated Decision-Making Process for Analysis of Ions and Organic Materials in Drinking Water
    Javanbakht, T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES-UKRAINE, 2023, 10 (01): : H1 - H7
  • [50] A MODEL APPROACH TO THE DECISION-MAKING PROCESS
    Mokra, Ivana
    [J]. 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE - THE KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION: APPLIED TECHNICAL SCIENCES AND ADVANCED MILITARY TECHNOLOGIES, CONFERENCE PROCEEDING 3, 2012, : 278 - 281